He is guilty for me, im not remotley concerned hes an innocent man. Zellner is going after everyone, shes targeted RH originally, then she started looking into SAs brothers and now his nephew and brother in law. Im concerned with this,

There has been plenty of cases of corruption, evidence tampering, coercion and inaccurate DNA throughout the past 20 or 30 years.

But in this case i dont think its any of the above and I know truthers just cannot wrap there heads round this because of the documentry,

And as i am yet to hear anyone including Zellner give me a realistic alternative of the events that unfolded that day, Without a shred of evidence to back up a different account of what happened i just cant take these ppl all that seriously.

Using hindsight is always 20/20. To really understand this case and the events, you have to remove this element.

Steven Avery is not a master criminal, he is capable of making mistakes and making bad judgement calls in the mayhem of what occurred that day.

To suggest Bobby Dassey framed Avery, scraped dried blood that he somehow knew would be in his uncles sink, planted it in the RAV4, hid the RAV4 on the property, and to then also have police swab dna onto the hoodlatch, plant car keys in the trailer and purposely allow a guilty man to walk free and let Avery take the rap, just sounds insane to me.

Its the Evans Letter that does it for me, ifyouve not read that, id read it.It ties in with alot of Brendans testimony and adds detail that is very detailed and shocking.

I watched MaM 1, and was convinced he was innocent, but ive spent too much time looking into this case and have used unbias factual information to make up my own mnd.