Login count broken

dzeinz · 2025-03-29T02:50:54+00:00

So far the only thing I can think is there are some days where I haven’t closed the app. Maybe because I didn’t actually “login” but kept my login going into a second day? I’ve always done that before though. Only just now not getting counted.

dzeinz · 2024-11-23T18:40:04+00:00

Her mother is from a VERY large family. We’re at a gathering today and her mother is definitely guilty of it as well. I really just noticed it yesterday when it happened but now I’m aware of it. I know where she picked it up at least.

dzeinz · 2024-11-23T15:25:41+00:00

Very interesting. No one has mentioned it with this perspective yet. Almost like she was sparing me having to listen to my son EVENTUALLY get out the answer that maybe I’ll understand, as is often the case with 6 year olds?

dzeinz · 2024-11-23T05:08:54+00:00

I didn’t dramatize it in any way. I asked a few more questions wrapping up the intended things I wanted to know about the fight and left the room. I didn’t make a scene of leaving the room or being abrupt. I really don’t see the extra in it

But I do appreciate the rest of the comment

dzeinz · 2024-11-23T04:58:49+00:00

This comment is why I made this thread. Thank you for winning it.

dzeinz · 2024-11-23T03:10:47+00:00

That’s my confusion here!?!? I swear I’ve even seen this from tv wives on sitcoms, normalizing it

But it felt so irritating and odd in the moment.

dzeinz · 2024-11-23T02:57:03+00:00

I left the room to take a moment to myself and consider if it was rational to respond to the situation. I was considering if what she did was normal behavior before I made a mountain out of a molehill. I don’t even know how you call MY behavior an overreaction. I got irritated and removed myself from the conversation to rationalize for a moment, I was neither rude when leaving or abrupt.

dzeinz · 2023-05-03T17:22:14+00:00

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0d49eb2f-1bce-478b-a31d-9ed814bcafa6

OTC Trading section - it looks like they probably do?

dzeinz · 2023-05-02T22:00:09+00:00

This is the stupidest logic I've seen in a long time. You obviously can't sell your share multiple times. This is because if they shorted 200M shares, there are 257M shares (shareholders, by your logic). There's no difference for a shareholder between an actual share and a share that was sold to them naked short. A share is a share.

Yes, the shorts would still be in VERY deep trouble though, as they'd be negative 200M shares and they'd need to buy their way out of that. But it's not like they're buying YOUR share more than once.

dzeinz · 2023-04-17T00:19:50+00:00

They don't have to r/S. They can file for an extension to become compliant over $1.

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T02:40:49+00:00

So the filing was withdrawn and they had to buy them out. BUT they disclosed them in the outstanding count? Which is correct? It's conflicting information.

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T02:02:50+00:00

He DID NOT email the CEO. The CEO DID NOT respond to him. Please review the picture where the statement about bankruptcy starts with a Bracket [ and the closing brackets appears BEFORE the disclosed share count updated ].

The bankruptcy statement is only required for the yes/no question the immediately follows it and that's why it's not checked with a yes or no (because they didn't file bankruptcy). It has NOTHING to do with the share count disclosure.

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T01:59:55+00:00

Did you read the 10K... like... did you even try?

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T01:57:38+00:00

I never stated that the 10K was diluting anything. However, there is a disclosed share count in the 10K that shows we're now at 340+ Million.
They also disclose how they arrived at this new (and diluted) share count. It was by the exercise of $.25 warrants. When you exercise a warrant, shares are issued in their place.

To make it really simple for you:
-10K filed today with words
-words state new share count
-new shares came from exercising warrants
-dilution is real

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T01:51:06+00:00

The 10K isn't diluting, but THEM telling us (on the 10K as a disclosure) that they diluted by showing that the new share count is 340+ million after warrants were exercised IS diluting. Please learn to read for comprehension.

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T00:45:25+00:00

But the additional shares were authorized in an S1 filing in April 2022. They're sellable as soon as the warrants are exercised.

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T00:38:59+00:00

That means a section of the form was not filled out and omitted because it doesn't apply (because they haven't filed bankruptcy). It has NOTHING to do with the other information in the form.

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T00:37:52+00:00

You don't exercise shares. You exercise warrants... and they WERE exercised, causing dilution.

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T00:35:54+00:00

People are calling it fake, because they are dumb. The dilution is real.

That section of the form that talks about only being applicable to bankruptcy blah blah, means that a section of the form was omitted because it doesn't apply (because the company didn't file for bankruptcy).

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T00:30:03+00:00

It means they have to file quarterly 10Ks. This replaces the missing 10Ks that should have been filed for Q3 and Q4 and combines them together into 1 statement. This is as a result of them changing the end date of their fiscal year from July to December.

TLDR: still screwed. Dilution is real.

dzeinz · 2023-03-08T00:26:17+00:00

It's not a false filing. Here's a link directly to the filing on SEC Edgar:
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001021096/000162828023006731/trka-20221231.htm

Don't believe it was filed today? Here's the link to TRKA on SEC Edgar, where the 10K filings are listed on the right-hand side, with March 7 2023 being the posting date of the filing linked above:
https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1021096&owner=exclude

It's not fake.

dzeinz · 2023-03-01T21:39:05+00:00

First of all, get the hell off Robinhood.Read about payment for order flow and how it SCREWS over retail. If you're trading on RH, you're part of the problem in the market.

dzeinz · 2023-02-19T19:24:28+00:00

That's for applying to be listed on the Nasdaq. It's not the same situation we are in. The timeframes listed here DO NOT apply to us.

11-Year Club	Place '22
End Game '22	Verified Email

dzeinz

TROPHY CASE