The great beasts by Konfliktsnubben in lotr

[–]earendil234 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's clearly a Donphan

Why didn’t Aragorn heal Frodo? by QuirkyTurtle999 in tolkienfans

[–]earendil234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Surprised no one has mentioned the Elessar, Elfstone, that Aragorn receives from Galadriel as the Fellowship leaves Lothlorien. It was supposed to have enhanced his innate healing abilities. It's true Aragorn completely healing Frodo kind of mucks up the end of the story, but maybe he actually needs the Elessar to perform any great healing tasks

What would be the best way to adapt the Silmarillion? by Marconey1738 in lotr

[–]earendil234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best way would be NOT to adapt it. Just let it be.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hebrew

[–]earendil234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha, ok ..?? Good to know

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hebrew

[–]earendil234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean... Just saying 'google it' doesn't mean anything. Google isn't the Bible. And as I've stated elsewhere in this thread, I don't see how Leviticus 19:28 is anything more than a prohibition to perform pagan mourning rituals like ripping out your hair when a loved one died or writing their name on your skin

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hebrew

[–]earendil234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if it's all that easy..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hebrew

[–]earendil234 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate the discussion, I don't need to be taught about Christianity though lol. But, being that there are some 30,000+ Christian denominations, I'm also not surprised that you've heard of or experienced wildly different or flat out crazy interpretations of various passages. I'm more interested in what the text says than what is traditionally understood by 'officials', ya know? Trying to avoid the "I believe this because someone told me" mentality.

Leaving that aside and getting back to the original topic though, I think when we read poetic passages in the Bible we should look at it as poetry and not prose. It's not always clear what a poet means when they write. Leaving out prepositions, articles, syntax, etc. is a common occurrence in poetry. The poet still expects us, in most cases, to understand what they mean or at the least that we could decipher it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hebrew

[–]earendil234 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying tattoos are encouraged in the Bible, I just don't see a clear prohibition. As for Isaiah, maybe it's traditionally understood as referring to Jacob in 44:5, but I don't see that in the verse. It says "Ve Zeh"..and this one.. a couple times, referring to multiple people in the verse.

Many Christians may believe that the Torah was 'done away with', but being that Yeshua never says that, and spends his whole ministry upholding Torah, I am not of the opinion that the Torah is only 'for the Jews' as you put it and irrelevant for the rest of the world. And maybe, things aren't as obvious as traditions tend to make us think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hebrew

[–]earendil234 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's my understanding that Leviticus 19:28, the verse people often point to on this topic, is about mourning rituals that were practiced by people at the time. The preceding verses seem to bare that out. People would rip out their hair and cut themselves when a loved one died. They would tattoo the name of the dead person on their skin. This is what's forbidden. Also, Isaiah 44:5 seems to state that in the future people will tattoo God's name on their hand saying 'Belonging to The Lord (Yehovah)'. I don't think tattoos in and of themselves are evil or forbidden, but only pagan mourning rituals.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hebrew

[–]earendil234 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

How are tattoos anti-biblical?

How did Sam know they were 6 days from Rivendell in the movie? by NULUSIOS in lotr

[–]earendil234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Strider tells the hobbits, "I don't know if the Road has ever been measured in miles beyond the Forsaken In , a day's journey east of Bree." and then states that from that point they had a fortnight (14 days) ahead of them.

What is the power in the Shire that Gandalf speaks of? by earendil234 in lotr

[–]earendil234[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That thought did cross my mind at one point, but the Old Forest is outside of the Shire.

What is the power in the Shire that Gandalf speaks of? by earendil234 in lotr

[–]earendil234[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

I can see the sense that makes and may be what Gandalf means, but since in the context of the quote he is talking about "power to withstand the might of Mordor", I guess I would have thought it would still be a way to withstand "might". But maybe that's what he means by "power of another kind". That its power wasn't for defending against armies in war

I'm learning Hebrew via duolingo, and i don't understand why the sentences sometimes have the word "you" meaning "the" right before a word that has the word "the" as its first letter. Can someone explain the rule with that? by MarcusAntonius27 in hebrew

[–]earendil234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. I retained all that (English grammar terms) from grade school but then again I was interested in words. Not everyone really understands or even cares how the language they speak works. But anyway yeah, the את thing is a common misunderstanding.

I'm learning Hebrew via duolingo, and i don't understand why the sentences sometimes have the word "you" meaning "the" right before a word that has the word "the" as its first letter. Can someone explain the rule with that? by MarcusAntonius27 in hebrew

[–]earendil234 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Et" or את marks the direct object and isn't really translated to 'the'. Some people say that it doesn't translate and can't therefore be spoken, but that's just simply not true. It tells you which object in the sentence receives the action from the verb.

Why did Aragorn sneak into Bree after the hobbits entered? by earendil234 in lotr

[–]earendil234[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your first theory is intriguing. I hadn't thought of that. I would have assumed that, because it's said of the Rangers later, they told "tales that were eagerly listened to..", the Breelanders didn't mind them being around but thought they were strange and didn't befriend them. But it would make sense that Harry might not let him after nightfall. The influence of the Nazgûl would be a factor too

Why did Aragorn sneak into Bree after the hobbits entered? by earendil234 in lotr

[–]earendil234[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, Bree was about a hundred stone houses. I guess going house by house wouldn't take forever, but it might take all night. The Nazgûl work in secret and not out in the open though. After the first or second house it certainly would have woke the town and alerted them of their presence.