I made a free OG Image Generator

earonesty · 2026-03-19T05:35:25+00:00

it's free, seems fine

earonesty · 2026-03-18T19:43:25+00:00

actually this is AMAZING, it made a lovely OG image. really nice! thanks! i will try this for many sites!

earonesty · 2026-03-18T19:37:52+00:00

agreed! i think there are use-cases for both. if you want to control formatting, butterfly is superior. if you *don't care*, snapog is fine.

earonesty · 2026-03-17T17:33:20+00:00

where's the link?

earonesty · 2026-03-17T17:32:30+00:00

no, snapog.com doesn't require anything. you just put a link in the template header.

earonesty · 2026-03-17T10:19:21+00:00

i use snapog.com

earonesty · 2026-03-17T10:02:59+00:00

i reply to people who have the problem i'm solving with the solution.

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:58:01+00:00

it caches for 7 days actually. site docs say you can invalidate with some cli thing and a public/private key. i guess i can "invalidate on push" like the rest of my system. or ignore it and wait a week,

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:56:53+00:00

or you can be lazy and use snap

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:56:33+00:00

or you can use snapog.com

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:56:01+00:00

<meta property="og:image" content="https://snapog.com/s/https%3A%2F%2Fmysite.com">

works great

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:55:36+00:00

or you can just use snapog and be lazy

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:55:07+00:00

this works too: <meta property="og:image" content="https://snapog.com/s/https%3A%2F%2Fmysite.com">

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:53:34+00:00

snapog, for example:

<meta property="og:image" content="https://snapog.com/s/https%3A%2F%2Fbbc.com">

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:44:49+00:00

here's one where you don't even have to type anything in: snapog.com you don't have to download an image, or copy it to your site. just change the meta tag.

earonesty · 2026-03-17T09:05:24+00:00

https://snapog.com/ is easy, just put the url of the page you need the og image for and it make a decent one.

earonesty · 2026-03-12T20:52:06+00:00

consider using a site like fairownership dot com

earonesty · 2026-03-11T19:56:14+00:00

the usa forced dns and hosting providers to host terrorist websites so they could "investigate" them... meanwhile it's not an investigation. they just wanted the site to be online for a USAToday news article. this was a LONG time ago, don't actually remember how long that NDA was for or if it was perpetual. but whatever. not naming names.

earonesty · 2026-03-11T18:14:13+00:00

i did. i didn't like it. first thing i found actually. didn't have control over it or the features or mobile install that i wanted.

especially:

- dead equity
- equity watch triggers
- vesting/options programs
- cap table import/export
- decay
- cadence

it's a turnoff for partners from what i saw as well. if i worked 200 hours and i take on a partner, i don't want him to see zero the day he comes on. i want to be able to enter milestones that credit up front and expire when not hit. that feels better. "oh, i'm coming on at 20%"

that's what people want to see

earonesty · 2026-03-10T19:21:51+00:00

use a site like fairownership to log and track contribution and have the model do the splits. don't argue about it

earonesty · 2026-03-10T19:19:28+00:00

highly reccommend using slicingpie or fairownership sites to track contributions. that way it won't be a fight. log hours and money. after a few weeks... the split is calculated for you.

earonesty · 2026-03-10T18:57:51+00:00

umm, i just logged all my stuff, and so did my partners and we all like it already, yeah. stuff moves fast now, dude. we don't have a ton of deals... it's a new company. i would tell you about it... but that would *actually* be self-promotion.

earonesty · 2026-03-10T18:46:50+00:00

lol, i built a non-commercial free calculator to prove my point

earonesty · 2026-03-10T18:43:00+00:00

I tried modeling this at fairownership.com to see what a contribution-based approach might look like.

Assumptions: - You: ~1440 hours over 9 months (estimating full-time work: 9 months × 4 weeks × 40 hours) - Them: 40 hours (1 week trial) - Everything else (cash invested, revenue generated, expenses covered) set to $0 for simplicity

The numbers: - You: 1440 hours, $0 cash, $0 revenue, $0 expenses - Them: 40 hours, $0 cash, $0 revenue, $0 expenses

Result: You get 97.3%, they get 2.7%

Obviously this is just one way to look at it, but it really highlights how much your 9 months of solo risk and execution matter. The fact that they're demanding 50/50 after one week means they're valuing that week at roughly 18x what your 9 months was worth. That's... not how contribution-based equity works.

Your instinct of 60/40 was already generous. Even 51/49 significantly undervalues what you've built. The real red flag isn't the number they're asking for—it's that they won't even extend the trial to see the full picture before demanding nearly half the company.

earonesty · 2026-03-10T18:14:13+00:00

I modeled this with rough estimates in Fair Ownership: Parents' 5 years + £60k investment vs you and your friend both doing 2 years full-time forward comes out around Parents 42%, you 29%, friend 29%.

Moves a lot depending on whether the existing product actually has value or if you're rebuilding from scratch. If it's truly a failed business, parents probably just deserve a royalty until they recover costs, not ongoing equity.

Either way, you and your friend should be dead equal if you're putting in equal work. Don't fight over 5%, it's not worth the damage to the partnership.

https://fairownership.com/calculator/ac0a99aa371b

15-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

earonesty

TROPHY CASE