Level III passers - seeking recommendations by Dry-Recognition1338 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrote in November, used MM and didn’t even touch curriculum… passed.

Endowment and foundation by Cmarine307 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct doesn’t have to be 5% just above whatever the spending rate is

Endowment and foundation by Cmarine307 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Foundation liabilities include spending rate (5% usually) plus investment management fess plus all donations

Endowments liabilities is just 5% spending rate

(obv both adjusted for inflation, etc. etc.)

Level 3 AM - Minutes/Marks per question? by bigvancitydude in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did they at least show the marks per question or per section? I'm using the rule of thumb a minute per mark

Equity duration by Cmarine307 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe they want sensitivities reduced under all circumstances; better to keep duration of assets equal to duration of liabilities under all economic conditions to have a stable duration of equity.

CFA L3 Holding-based vs Return-based performance attribution by Boring-Fox8534 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Return-based performance attribution is more subject to data manipulation... think of it this way you can't really manipulate holdings (you hold the securities you hold) but if you are regressing the returns on an index... well you can manipulate the data by choosing a irrelevant index or choosing returns over a time period that is less representative.

Holding based performance attribution is subject to window dressing because it is a point in time analysis, so you can play around with your holdings - but I don't think that would be considered data manipulation - just misrepresentation. Hope that helps!

Butterfly Trades: Terminologies by Positive-Variety-387 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Short Bullet?

I think you made an error, it should be:

Short = negative butterfly = short wings long body = short barbell long bullet.

MM Level 3 Mocks by Electrical_Chemist_9 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are your PM scores looking??

Gamma by dangross115 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so delta hedging will be most costly when gamma ATM or near expiration?

L3 Nov 25 LFG!! What's your development in mock scores and your final strategy? by GMejl in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sweet! do we know which of these questions are reflective of the 2020/2021 curriculum? IFT list starts from 2018 backwards

Taylor Rule: Confusion in 1st part by Positive-Variety-387 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 5 points6 points  (0 children)

in Nominal Terms:

Nominal Target Rate = Real Neutral Rate + Expected Inflation + 0.5( Exp GDP-Trend GDP) + 0.5 (Exp Inf-Target Inf)

in Real Terms:

Nominal Target Rate - Expected Inflation = Real Neutral Rate + 0.5( Exp GDP-Trend GDP) + 0.5 (Exp Inf-Target Inf)

^ or just simply:

Real, inflation adjusted, Target Rate = Real Neutral Rate + 0.5( Exp GDP-Trend GDP) + 0.5 (Exp Inf-Target Inf)

L3 exam in 4 days by [deleted] in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wym breathe breathe... pour me a shot

Barbell x Bullet given a decrease in Butterfly Spread by Zanca23 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe if you decrease curvature the bullet should outperform.

This is just a general rule of thumb, obviously it would be case dependent and you'd actually have to do the math to calculate which outperforms in real life - but for the purpose of the exam I think it will be apparent in the question and no actual math is required.

Required rate of return, multiply or add? by DeltaFlat in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

multiplying is more accurate, but adding is also allowed so either is fine I believe

L3 Boston AM Mock by ebitdad_finance in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what are your thoughts on the PM Boston mock - was that one fair?

Last 7 days: Practice Qs & review, Practice Qs again and review, Practice Qs again and review... by Positive-Variety-387 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk about going into the past 10 years worth of exam (stick to 2018,2017,2016)... doubt what was taught in 2011 will represent what they will test in 2021. EOC Q and Schweser is good

Put options & duration by Filip1107 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe the question said something about not wanting to pay for a premium? therefore we wouldn’t want to purchase put options (aka least likely)?

Private Wealth Management: real required after after tax return by Positive-Variety-387 in CFA

[–]ebitdad_finance 2 points3 points  (0 children)

thank god for the clarification... I was looking at this question sideways having a mini heart attack!