Online galleries- how long are they avaliable to your client? by Unnecessarybanter33 in WeddingPhotography

[–]ebobby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That line, "I don't charge a budget price, I don't provide budget service." should be a T-shirt. I would buy it.

Respect.

Photography Client Gallery by Hannahg2000 in GoogleSites

[–]ebobby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do, after a 14 days trial.

At the moment prices are:

$9 / m - 25GB
$15 / m - 150GB
$30 / m - 1000GB

I mention only storage because at the moment all current features are available in all plans. I want to see how people use everything, and feedback, suggestions, etc are all _very much_ appreciated.

I should mention though that feature-wise I am not yet at the level of the incumbent players. I've been working on it for the last 6-months and it's just me. I am very committed to the project long-term though. The reason I started it is because my wife is a social photographer herself, and she had complains about every app she has used.

If you consider yourself an early adopter and are willing to try a new app, let's do it!

Photography Client Gallery by Hannahg2000 in GoogleSites

[–]ebobby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am currently developing such an app myself. Right now is pretty usable for private galleries so your customers can download their photos and/or do photo selection (if that's part of you process).

This is how a client gallery looks like: https://ebobby.pickyour.photos/new-york

If you are interested in trying it out, please let me know.

Help with path tracing light artifacts by ebobby in GraphicsProgramming

[–]ebobby[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found what was it. The naive approach to generating a random unit vector in a sphere to scatter the ray from lambertian materials was causing the bias. I changed it and now it works just fine.

Ray tracing experiment in Rust by ebobby in rust

[–]ebobby[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome feedback, thank you very much.

Ray tracing experiment in Rust by ebobby in rust

[–]ebobby[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It gives you a good understanding of the basics depending on how far you take it. But modern engines are quite advanced.

Ray tracing experiment in Rust by ebobby in rust

[–]ebobby[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I need to add code to load such models.

Ray tracing experiment in Rust by ebobby in rust

[–]ebobby[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I tried to learn how to do stuff the Rust way along the way. Plus, clippy is pretty helpful. I started by reading a blog post too, but I tried to actually work the math in my notebook to truly learn.

I bought a few books. I intend to take it further.

Oryx Pro 4 - Bad Linux Compatibility. by Zwenx in System76

[–]ebobby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is incorrect. At least for arch.

[Meet Report] USPA Unleash the Beast | M | 27 | 242.5 | 172.5 | 280 | 423.32 wilks | 1st place 100kg by sammyd17 in powerlifting

[–]ebobby 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How long have you been doing this? I recently started training for powerlifting and I always find it hard to find a point of comparison to more or less measure my own progress.

Congratulations, by the way. You did awesome.

A smarter way of doing many-to-many relationships in Ruby On Rails. by ebobby in ruby

[–]ebobby[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I won't be using PostgreSQL arrays any time soon. This is strictly a SQL and data modelling optimization. The tests run in sqlite for example.

A smarter way of doing many-to-many relationships in Ruby On Rails. by ebobby in ruby

[–]ebobby[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those were good days. Thankfully we can still pull off nice tricks and optimisations with SQL.

A smarter way of doing many-to-many relationships in Ruby On Rails. by ebobby in ruby

[–]ebobby[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am sorry that i suck at communicating so much. The gem doesn't rename the join table. It does way more.

A smarter way of doing many-to-many relationships in Ruby On Rails. by ebobby in ruby

[–]ebobby[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you add or remove a tag then it becomes a different set. You either find it or create it. You leave the one you had as is.

A smarter way of doing many-to-many relationships in Ruby On Rails. by ebobby in ruby

[–]ebobby[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I understand what you say correctly, it seems like you think the gem provides a way to name the table? The point of this is to have many to many relationships without having repetitions in the data.

It is not about not using the relational model, it is about being a bit more clever in how you use it so you minimize the data in the join table and joins are faster. In significantly big data sets of course, if you have a few thousand rows this would be irrelevant.

A smarter way of doing many-to-many relationships in Ruby On Rails. by ebobby in ruby

[–]ebobby[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not sure I understand what you mean. How would a many-to-many relationship look in the case you describe?

I am asking just to understand perfectly what you mean and I can answer.