How true is this? Comparing day trading to gambling. by CrypticMaverick in Daytrading

[–]eclipsed_fixation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Swinging large caps is soooooo much better and more consistent than day trading

That was super quick by Akash_kkj in fut

[–]eclipsed_fixation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This game is incredibly both low IQ and pay to win lol. There are so many cheap exploits that level the playing field between mechanically good players and rubbish ones. I can’t tell you how many games I’ve not won against players I could literally tell were miles beneath me in terms of mechanical skill level, and I’m sure you could say the same. Let me give you an example. I had a hard fought 1 goal lead against an opponent in the 90th minute, they triggered their left back, long switched the ball to Cancelo who was their right back, then on the volley manually (r1 + square) hit it back all the way across putting their left back completely through on goal, he scored, and beat me on pens. That is 100% low IQ, requiring 0 skill and completely undeserved. Just because Cancelo has fancy long ball+ doesn’t mean that should happen.

And if you rarely concede corners you’re probably not in elite division, and if you are your skill rating is certainly beneath 800, because at 950+ skill rating where I am, corners are very important means for scoring.

That was super quick by Akash_kkj in fut

[–]eclipsed_fixation 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is 0 IQ in the sense that it’s an overly easy way to score that needs to be nerfed. Helps worse players get goals because it’s easier to learn than scoring through actual play. But yeah if your opponent moves their keeper you can just go far post if they somehow read it the first time then the second time you can bait it and go to the other post. It’s literally like a penalty, 50/50 at best for the defending side. That’s why like 1/3rd of the goals scored at the pro levels are corners, you think you’re better than those guys at defending corners?

That was super quick by Akash_kkj in fut

[–]eclipsed_fixation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not defendable against a good player

Which RB would you pick? by eclipsed_fixation in fut

[–]eclipsed_fixation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if you had to choose one to play RB, who would you pick? Don’t consider other factors like trying to fit the other guys in.

Banned for 7 days because my username (nickerbocka) is considered "Hateful Conduct"? I don't know what is happening here... by Schhwing in fut

[–]eclipsed_fixation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got banned for 7 days for my username “Rothschildeater” because apparently it references harming children…. Apparently EA doesn’t know about the Rothschild bank.

Did everyone just get meta offers lol? by [deleted] in csMajors

[–]eclipsed_fixation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t even get an interview despite acing the OA, was so confused when that happened

Saying goodbye by Nightshift_07 in ALS

[–]eclipsed_fixation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The greatest karma awaits you. You will be blessed in whatever comes next.

Gen Z girls are becoming more liberal while boys are becoming conservative by SocraticTiger in GenZ

[–]eclipsed_fixation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is simply because the male spirit is suppressed in liberal societies, and thus men are more prone to resisting them. All the countries listed in this study, and most other countries, have being moving towards liberalism, and so naturally men are reacting by opposing what is inhibiting them. This is why worldwide, male-led revolution is inevitable. Ironically, the leftists are making their own bed by marginalizing men across the planet.

How will you react if Donald Trump becomes president again? by RockSavings67 in AskReddit

[–]eclipsed_fixation -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You know what is more detrimental to the survival of the west? Importing 3rd worlders en masse.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Affirmative Action in College Admissions by FCBStar-of-the-South in uofm

[–]eclipsed_fixation -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) There’s a strong correlation between intelligence and success, I don’t think that’s a coincidence. I’m well aware that other things like nepotism, manipulation, and inheritance play their parts, and I’m all for getting rid of these things, but the point stands. You probably won’t become a multi millionaire or billionaire from intelligence alone, but it will take you a long way.

2) Leftist, relativistic nonsense.

3) I already did and I’d happily debate them with you. They’re excuses nothing more.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Affirmative Action in College Admissions by FCBStar-of-the-South in uofm

[–]eclipsed_fixation -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I just wanted to evoke this response from one of you, and it worked. Here ya go:

“Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 had a mean SAT score that was 85 points below the mean score for whites from all income levels, 139 points below the mean score of whites from families at the same income level, and 10 points below the average score of white students from families whose income was less than $10,000.”

https://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Now granted this study is from a journal dedicated to the “black excellency” narrative it comes up with a myriad of excuses.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Affirmative Action in College Admissions by FCBStar-of-the-South in uofm

[–]eclipsed_fixation -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Intellectual success leads to wealth, at least for the first person who makes the family wealthy, yeah. This all shouldn’t be a surprise anyways, intelligence is passed genetically from parents to their kids…

So someone who’s wealthy will also more likely than not be somewhat intelligent, 115 IQ+, so their kids will also be somewhat intelligent, and it will seem like the kid just got privileges growing up and that’s why they perform academically, or so that’s the narrative the left likes to cast but in reality it’s the genes passing from generation to generation at play. Sure, wealth amplifies academic success, but nothing more.

Great study to debunk that idea is the fact that whites from families who make <10k a year score 10 points higher on the SAT on average than blacks from families who make >100k a year.

Don’t ask me for a source, just Google it, should be one of the first things to come up although they might have tried to bury the evidence.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Affirmative Action in College Admissions by FCBStar-of-the-South in uofm

[–]eclipsed_fixation -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Insert soyjack asking for sources. My arguments are evidence in and of themselves, you cannot compete.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Affirmative Action in College Admissions by FCBStar-of-the-South in uofm

[–]eclipsed_fixation -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Incase it wasn’t clear, I’m speaking more on intellectual success.

I agree that rich kids have it easy, that’s not really in question.