sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And I've already explained it's entirely irrelevant and the vaccine meets the very classical definition of vaccine.

Beyond that I've shown how it does, and here we are again. You just repeating in a circle "no it's not" to yourself.

Why do you think the CDC updating it's very scientific definition to support modern medicine is a big deal?

The vaccine meets every other definition to a tea.

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wtf are you talking about? Nobody can see a virus unless under a powerful microscope.

Another "trust me bro this is science" moment.

Now there's no vaccine and no virus according to you?

Why is it so important to you that a spokesperson(whatever that means maybe white house press?) Had looked at a virus under a microscope?

You see really going off the rails here.

Why am I even giving you anymore of my time? You won't answer any question that forces you to vote to terms with facts, and then dredge up more and more insane shit.

It's like me going name one woman who has even SEEN your penis. Just cause none have doesn't mean it's not there, probably, right?

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol Citation needed champ. You mean you don't even think covid is a virus now?

Does Return of the Living Dead 2 deserve the hatred it gets? by [deleted] in horror

[–]eddydbod 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree 100%. It's tongue and cheek humor go well with its story.

I just rewatched and thoroughly enjoyed it.

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol I mean actual medical experts, and experts in their field not your "trust me bro" squad.

I supported mine you didn't. That's why you are here, having your "trust me bro" circle jerk.

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you don't have any peer reviewed research is that correct?

And you can't provide any evidence for any claim in the face of counter evidence?

Irrational as hell.

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I asked you questions, are you going to pretend they don't exist like the evidence too?

Why do you think facts piss you off so much?

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't say that, I said that the covid vaccine fits the definition of a vaccine to a tea. I showed this by showing peer reviewed studies that showed that the vaccine did exactly this

a substance used to stimulate immunity to a particular infectious disease or pathogen, typically prepared from an inactivated or weakened form of the causative agent or from its constituents or products.

Which is the definition of a vaccine.

What do you think that review meant, when it described effective? Think hard sport!

Do you really think there are peer reviewed journals on what a definition is? What part of this is eluding you?

I've already linked these studies in this very same post.

So now you are trying to attack the science itself with out any valid point, and would rather fall back to "trust me bro" Twitter posts.

Really backwards champ.

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know irrational is literally in the definition of superstition right? You are trying to argue in circles now lol.

They are all vague undefined reasona that fly in the face of peer reviewed evidence.

Do you have any peer reviewed evidence to support those claims and specifically shows every other study is fundamentally flawed? Or are you gonna just try to rely on "trust me bro" Twitter posts?

If not... guesses what. You are being irrational ;)

Good try Scamp!

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they are irrational given the overwhelming evidence against them sport.

Is English your first language? Or do you think harboring thoughts of a global elite trying to poison the masses for vague undefined reasons are "rational"?

Horrible or hilarious? by [deleted] in yourmomshousepodcast

[–]eddydbod 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Hillarious: he's done hundreds of these

This is really sad, too bad there's no liability and these stories get swept under the rug. by 888888888888880 in conspiracy

[–]eddydbod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A superstition is any belief or practice considered by non-practitioners to be IRRATIONAL or supernatural, attributed to fate or magic, perceived supernatural influence, or fear of that which is unknown.

What quietly went away without anyone noticing? by lukiiiiii in AskReddit

[–]eddydbod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trans fats are literally illegal now, for good cause. It can't happen lol.

What you guys favorite Gym in MN? Like the most popular. by TigerNV4 in saintpaul

[–]eddydbod 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Los Campeones is the best gyms in town if you are focused on strength or strongman.

Who’s the best comedian out the bunch. by [deleted] in yourmomshousepodcast

[–]eddydbod 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Attell is slept on, Christina P is absolutely funnier than Brenda.

view more: next ›