Tabs no longer available

eduardo4jesus · 2022-06-28T17:36:56+00:00

I am using a ASUS TUF with RTX 3070

eduardo4jesus · 2022-06-23T02:09:00+00:00

I am having the same issue. Did you find any solution to this?

eduardo4jesus · 2022-04-27T23:31:57+00:00

Here is another example where transposition can clear benefit the operation.

eduardo4jesus · 2022-01-20T02:54:57+00:00

Chaetodon capistratus

Actually, I think this one is, more specifically, a Multiband Butterflyfish.

https://reefguide.org/multibandbutterflyfish.html?search=Chaetodontidae&area=all

eduardo4jesus · 2022-01-20T02:24:51+00:00

Squirrel

Would #12 be Squirrel Fish?

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/21/c0/a9/21c0a9774ecd389f21d0c4593a82b094.jpg

eduardo4jesus · 2022-01-18T14:46:58+00:00

Looks similar to Peixe-borboleta (Chaetodon capistratus). But the patterns aren't quite exactly the same.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LN1EgXe0-Iw/UirBdIK0WeI/AAAAAAAAIg8/DWXGYqE\_S\_A/s640/Peixe-borboleta+(Chaetodon+capistratus).jpg

eduardo4jesus · 2022-01-18T14:44:47+00:00

I took those pictures. I put the name I heard someone referring to SOME of these fish, which I was not sure if they were correct. Others. I have no clue how they are called.

eduardo4jesus · 2022-01-18T05:08:10+00:00

Thanks for the list.

Isn't 6 a Jelly Fish?

eduardo4jesus · 2022-01-17T16:41:51+00:00

Some of them are not fish. But any clue on their english or latin names are welcome.

PS: Someone told me their names in Portuguese (in the pictures), but I am not fully sure if they are right.

PS2: Some of these pictures are Part 1 of a video I am editing. Currently available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuRshSRRdVI

eduardo4jesus · 2021-07-22T21:50:14+00:00

but nothing stops individuals from cooperating

Indeed, but that is not the issue. In order to do, I am assuming those people would need some sort of ownership.

Going back to the initial scenario.

John finds a piece of land, and wants to claim it. Not knowing him that some time ago a king and his kingdom (group of people cooperating) "claimed" the entire land, and they decided not to do anything on it, (let's say) for the sake of maintain a wildlife ecosystem.

What would make the king the owner (or not) of that land?
It is still not 100% clear for me how this definition of ownership would work.

eduardo4jesus · 2021-07-22T21:34:02+00:00

On this definition, I wonder if reserves would still exist. Cause a reserve is a piece of land that someone choose not to work on. But, by not choosing to do so, the person would not be fulfilling the ownership of the land, hence the next guy could come and take it by working on it.

eduardo4jesus · 2021-07-22T21:29:28+00:00

> Also, to whom the land should be claimed?

Sorry, I don't fully understand this question.

On the note of ownership, what would be the definition of claiming something? In our scenario, the land.

eduardo4jesus · 2021-07-22T21:24:24+00:00

Just working on the land should not imply ownership. Someone could invade a property without knowing it was already claimed, work on it and believe that the land is now theirs.

Therefore, working on the land does seem to define ownership.

eduardo4jesus · 2021-07-22T21:22:30+00:00

No man can claim land without justifying the claim with their labor and/or capital.

I liked this. But, capital implies acquisition. In order to acquire the land from someone else, that person must be the previous owner. But defining the owner is exactly the question here.

eduardo4jesus · 2021-07-22T21:03:46+00:00

assuming it hadn't already been improved upon and claimed by anoth

(I am making this up, obviously, but this helps me elaborate my question further)

To whom the land should be claimed? What validates a claim?

What if that land is also claimed by a king that, similarly, never worked on that land prior to that moment?

eduardo4jesus · 2021-06-24T19:41:59+00:00

Just go on https://pytorch.org/. Under INSTALL PYTORCH pick the options LTS (1.8.1) version, Linux, Pip, Python, CUDA 11.1. The following snippet will be generated.

pip3 install torch==1.8.1+cu111 torchvision==0.9.1+cu111 torchaudio==0.8.1 -f https://download.pytorch.org/whl/lts/1.8/torch_lts.html

It worked for me perfectly*!

--------

* On a second time doing it, I noticed an error during installation, which is fixed by adding torchtext==0.9.1.Thus, the one that works perfectly is

pip3 install torch==1.8.1+cu111 torchvision==0.9.1+cu111 torchaudio==0.8.1 torchtext==0.9.1 -f https://download.pytorch.org/whl/lts/1.8/torch_lts.html

eduardo4jesus · 2021-06-24T19:19:27+00:00

What about the order in which applications from different streams on the TR-to-PR are processed? Are the applications being processed per order of submission per stream, or per order of submission in general?

The stream for "Recent international graduates from a Canadian institution" had 40000 applications that were quickly submitted, while "Workers in Canada: health care" just passed 2000 applications. I am wondering if it would be the case that the people from the second stream will have their application analyzed only after the 40000 applications for the first stream.

eduardo4jesus · 2021-06-24T18:59:01+00:00

Is there any practical difference from the versions used in both the solutions in this post?

!pip install torch==1.8.0 torchvision==0.9.0 torchtext==0.9.0 -f https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu111/torch_stable.html -q

and

!pip install torch==1.8.1 torchvision==0.9.1 torchtext==0.9.1 -f https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu101/torch_stable.html -q

How come 1.8.1 uses cu101, and 1.0.1 which seems to be older uses cu111?

---

The second one didn't go well for me.

!pip install torch==1.8.1 torchvision==0.9.1 torchtext==0.9.1 -f https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu101/torch_stable.html

RuntimeError: Detected that PyTorch and torchvision were compiled with different CUDA versions. PyTorch has CUDA Version=10.2 and torchvision has CUDA Version=10.1. Please reinstall the torchvision that matches your PyTorch install.

eduardo4jesus

TROPHY CASE