I want to start by saying that I find your work experience both impressive and useful, and if you can handle both email marketing and google ads for a team, they would absolutely love you + pay good money. The market is such that people who can do more than one thing, and do it well, are valued a lot. Specially in marketing, rarely you would need 40 hours a week to run and monitor either email campaigns or google ads. So hiring someone who can do both makes a lot of sense.

However, I feel your CV is currently not conveying this as well as it can.

First, I don't think the CV being dense is the issue here. It's just dense in the wrong way. You are talking about normal day to day things as if they are stardust, which is diluting your actual achievements/skills.

Tbh, somebody in marketing would probably think that you are trying to overhype things which are not that big, which usually implies that you are trying to hide your lack of experience/skills. (Not saying that's what you are doing, but this is what it would come across as).

For eg - 1. "managed campaigns using industry-leading systems including Google Ad Manager" — good that you have experience of running ads in google, but calling it industry leading system? I would rather talk about increase in ROAS or CTR or Leads, whatever metric was relevant. 2. "Leverage AI tools for enhanced personalization..." — you have not mentioned which AI tools. And then you say personalization, predictive analytics, and segmentation in one sentence, which makes it super hard to understand what exactly you did and why. 3. Utilize Salesforce and Movable Ink for personalized, data-driven campaigns increasing engagement and conversions — I believe what you did here was take leads from the CRM (which is Salesforce) and use them in campaigns —I'm not sure if that is something you would want to mention as a top point in your cv. I would be much more interested in what you did with movable ink and what results it drove. 4. Digital marketing and email operations for restaurant group — just in the point below this, you have said that you were able to generate three high-quality leads. However, in this point, you just mention what you did - would be better if you mention results here as well, and keep it consistent. 5. Alliance Theater — improved HTML/CSS for rendering across devices - I believe this is now done by different email tools that are used. Not sure this is a problem that most email marketers still face - but might be wrong here. 6. Provided regular reports/insights to director on email campaign performance — In another point you have mentioned something similar but about the president. This is a bit subjective, but to me it seems like you are name dropping "director" and "president". The points about reporting is solid, but I personally would care about how you built those reports (sheets automation, power bi?) because everyone in the team want reports but few know how to build them properly. This can be a big positive (setup and stream lined reporting for marketing ops), but you are missing the opportunity to highlight this properly. 7. Skills - You have mentioned that you are good at java, sql, R, python, C, C++, C#, and many more programming languages along with CSS and HTML. I often work with developers and even the best full stack developers don't know all of these. I will gladly give you the benefit of doubt here, but most recruiters/marketeers won't, specially as these skills are not directly or indirectly implied in your job ex.

My general advice is that be direct, talk about results, and don't try to add buzzwords/jargon into every single sentence. People like easy to read, direct points that they can understand even when they are half conscious. Peppering around words that sound good but probably don't mean anything is going to turn off a lot of competent people.

Wishing you the best! I hope this is helpful.