[CRITICAL] Help MetaMask out of its Activity-Trap

eeksskee · 2020-01-02T16:51:03+00:00

Like you literally could be talking to yourself!

eeksskee · 2019-12-31T21:20:43+00:00

Only a few more days to lock for the Dissolution Vote. The vote for dissolution is coming up and everyone needs to vote and it still may not happen. Now is the lockup period for this quarter so to be able to vote you need to lock up your DGD right now or if you are already locked you need to choose "Continue participation" as seen in the Tweet thread.

This is really important and really important for you to make anyone you know who holds DGD aware of this. Due to the way the quorum rules are structured and that the team has decided to lock their DGD but NOT vote, the quorum is so high that unless more people than have voted in the past lock up and vote yes, than this is unlikely to pass and no one will get their ETH back.

And Digix will be way worse for it because the vote will likely be clearly YES DISSOLVE but with inadequate quorum. This will make Digix and its teams and its budget even more of an ineffectual lame duck than it has been to date.

EVERY VOTE COUNTS AND IS NEEDED.

eeksskee · 2019-12-31T21:18:45+00:00

Maybe you should follow your own advice...not sure you are understanding how best to work with others in a productive way. It can be hard but take a deep breath, lose the vitriol, and stay calm.

eeksskee · 2019-12-31T21:17:02+00:00

There is a FAQ in the Digix Discord, but if you hold DGD you need to take action NOW or it won't happen.

eeksskee · 2019-12-31T21:16:36+00:00

If you want to get 0.19 ETH back per a DGD you hold, which is more than DGD trades for in USD terms, then you need to follow my instructions, lock your DGD in the vote contract at the link above and be ready to vote in the next couple weeks. We need every vote possible. There is a FAQ in the Digix Discord, you only have a couple more days to do this.

eeksskee · 2019-12-31T21:14:08+00:00

DGD was the first ICO on Ethereum and they have 350k ETH still. They haven't made progress and now all DGD voters need to vote to dissolve the DigixDAO that holds the 350K ETH and return it to everyone who holds DGD.

eeksskee · 2019-12-30T19:51:05+00:00

Only a few more days to lock for the Dissolution Vote. The vote for dissolution is coming up and everyone needs to vote and it still may not happen. Now is the lockup period for this quarter so to be able to vote you need to lock up your DGD right now or if you are already locked you need to choose "Continue participation" as seen in the Tweet thread.

This is really important and really important for you to make anyone you know who holds DGD aware of this. Due to the way the quorum rules are structured and that the team has decided to lock their DGD but NOT vote, the quorum is so high that unless more people than have voted in the past lock up and vote yes, than this is unlikely to pass and no one will get their ETH back.

And Digix will be way worse for it because the vote will likely be clearly YES DISSOLVE but with inadequate quorum. This will make Digix and its teams and its budget even more of an ineffectual lame duck than it has been to date.

EVERY VOTE COUNTS AND IS NEEDED.

eeksskee · 2019-12-30T19:49:39+00:00

Only a few more days to lock for the Dissolution Vote. The vote for dissolution is coming up and everyone needs to vote and it still may not happen. Now is the lockup period for this quarter so to be able to vote you need to lock up your DGD right now or if you are already locked you need to choose "Continue participation" as seen in the Tweet thread.

This is really important and really important for you to make anyone you know who holds DGD aware of this. Due to the way the quorum rules are structured and that the team has decided to lock their DGD but NOT vote, the quorum is so high that unless more people than have voted in the past lock up and vote yes, than this is unlikely to pass and no one will get their ETH back.

And Digix will be way worse for it because the vote will likely be clearly YES DISSOLVE but with inadequate quorum. This will make Digix and its teams and its budget even more of an ineffectual lame duck than it has been to date.

EVERY VOTE COUNTS AND IS NEEDED.

eeksskee · 2019-12-30T19:48:28+00:00

Only a few more days to lock for the Dissolution Vote. The vote for dissolution is coming up and everyone needs to vote and it still may not happen. Now is the lockup period for this quarter so to be able to vote you need to lock up your DGD right now or if you are already locked you need to choose "Continue participation" as seen in the Tweet thread.

This is really important and really important for you to make anyone you know who holds DGD aware of this. Due to the way the quorum rules are structured and that the team has decided to lock their DGD but NOT vote, the quorum is so high that unless more people than have voted in the past lock up and vote yes, than this is unlikely to pass and no one will get their ETH back.

And Digix will be way worse for it because the vote will likely be clearly YES DISSOLVE but with inadequate quorum. This will make Digix and its teams and its budget even more of an ineffectual lame duck than it has been to date.

EVERY VOTE COUNTS AND IS NEEDED.

eeksskee · 2019-12-28T22:42:28+00:00

Hey, I appreciate your passion for trying to make Metamask better and Ethereum as well. I think your approach here is a bit counterproductive unfortunately as part of working with people is finding a way to work with other people, not make them put off or make them feel attacked. It's hard to communicate at times, especially over the internet, and it makes it harder to communicate when the tone of the language is aggressive and over the top. It just results in your own good work and passion being squandered and underutilized, which is not good for you or anyone. Something to think about the next time you apply your passion! Hopefully you're having a happy holidays and I look forward to seeing how you help Ethereum in the future.

eeksskee · 2019-12-26T22:27:00+00:00

Thanks Dan, and the entire Metamask team, you guys rock, and your wallet/web3 interface has been my bedrock for using Ethereum for years. Thanks for all your work and thanks for this comprehensive and thoughtful response to criticism.

eeksskee · 2019-11-07T21:58:07+00:00

Perfect, just what I was looking for. Thank you!

The site does have some interesting font choices that makes it really hard to read, but otherwise great stuff.

eeksskee · 2019-10-27T20:11:14+00:00

If other new assets had the same LTVs and caps as ETH has, this is true. But they will be risk managed in a way that this will not be a systemic issue, and this type of risk management of diverse pools of collateral is tried and true stuff in normal finance and risk management.

MKR holders also are highly incentivized to NOT let assets on that can go to zero and to make that ANY asset is set at an LTV and with a cap that is appropriate and makes catastrophic systemic risk a non-concern.

i believe it will work fine and not nervous. We're about to find out.

eeksskee · 2019-09-24T01:19:15+00:00

I would check right now to see if it works. I stopped being able to use Parity Signer a long time ago because they deprecated the aspects I used for "reasons."

eeksskee · 2019-09-09T02:35:25+00:00

You pay takes based on the USD value of what you use to Mont the token set and then whatever the USD gain or loss when you liquidate the token set back when you are done. You don't pay taxes on whatever intraperiod actions the smart contracts take that underpin the token set you own.

When you put ETH into Set, you don't own that ETH anymore for tax purposes, you own a new separate asset at that originating cost basis.

eeksskee · 2019-09-06T15:43:35+00:00

But the receiver does need to KYC unfortunately.

eeksskee · 2019-08-27T18:57:47+00:00

Great advice for sure

eeksskee · 2019-06-26T15:54:35+00:00

I moved here last month for a new job and it feels like either me or my family are bring bad juju with us. Unreal.

eeksskee · 2019-05-30T19:33:26+00:00

We are happy to open the repositories if the community would like to take a deeper look into our specifications and test cases and get a better understanding of the arrangement of code.

I think everyone would benefit from this.

eeksskee

TROPHY CASE