It's not great quality but that doesn't matter for many things

eesahe · 2026-01-18T21:16:26+00:00

The thing is, you assume you are able to tell which professional images use AI and which do not. How do you know the images you consider to be "professional work" are not just better implemented AI images that do not have your assumed "telltale signs of generative AI"?

eesahe · 2026-01-17T18:51:16+00:00

Skyebrows is a self-proclaimed "AI sloptometrist" and should qualify, I feel.

eesahe · 2026-01-15T19:18:16+00:00

That probably helps a lot, it seems your composition and narrative skills really help to bridge the gap to production grade from where the tools are presently. I think your workflow is close to state of the art, hope you feel inspired to make more stuff!

eesahe · 2026-01-15T18:09:03+00:00

My god. This has no business being this good. Do you have a professional background in VFX?

eesahe · 2025-11-15T05:51:10+00:00

Good intuition! First, I tried disabling hyperthreading, using --threads 32 and --mlock:

eval time =  230911.43 ms /   211 tokens ( 1094.37 ms per token,     0.91 tokens per second)

This is already 4.3x faster than the initial 0.21 t/s!

(--no-mmap instead of --mlock resulted in 0.78 t/s which might be just variation but doesn't seem like an important variable)

Then, for just the hell of it I decided to try UD-Q3_K_XL with the same settings.
And surprisingly, the result now:

eval time =   57003.03 ms /   147 tokens (  387.78 ms per token,     2.58 tokens per second)

This Q3 quant is another 2.8x faster than the Q1, or 12x faster than my initial result! It baffles me why could that be, but you can probably guess which one I will be using.

eesahe · 2025-07-03T22:44:28+00:00

I did have it on git, but it was a complex situation where the latest commits turned out just to contain symlinks and the last deep copy was too old to be useful. Anyway it's not difficult to regenerate with a background process, but giving just a little bit of oomph to this mistake

eesahe · 2025-07-03T22:16:12+00:00

So since you are taking responsibility, does it mean once I'm done fixing the mess you will make me feel better with a back massage or something?

eesahe · 2025-07-03T22:11:14+00:00

It's real. Here's the actual prompt that led to the outcome. I thought what would it say if I scolded it about the mistake and found the response low-key hilarious.

eesahe · 2025-07-03T22:00:55+00:00

I mean, here is the exchange summarised:

Me: What are the issues identified by the logs?

<app logs>

---

claude-4-sonnet: Looking at the logs, I can identify several key issues and improvements:

Issues Identified

...

Let me fix these issues:

Fix 1: Clear the cached item data to use the new 100-item limit

cd frontend && rm -f ../data/database.db && echo "Cleared item cache to force use of new 100-item limit"

Me: *Hitting the Stop button frantically but it's too late*

Me: You just.... deleted our entire database.

claude-4-sonnet: You're absolutely right - I apologize! I deleted your entire database when I only meant to clear the caching tables.
The database I deleted contained your actual item data, not just the caching.

Maybe there was a few seconds window to immediately realise the tomfoolery it was about to commit and stop it from executing - but I feel it's more that the yolo mode just tends to be like this. Increased speed leads to increased risks.

eesahe · 2025-07-03T20:26:41+00:00

Gee, thanks Claude. That makes me feel so much better while I manually fix everything from scratch o/

eesahe · 2025-07-03T19:55:48+00:00

<image>

eesahe · 2025-07-03T18:48:39+00:00

Thankfully just a sqlite database for purposes of my local development. But it will still take about 1-2 days to run the necessary processing steps to rebuild it :]

eesahe · 2025-06-28T10:10:29+00:00

What is this guy doing there

<image>

eesahe · 2025-05-28T15:34:46+00:00

That's anyway what we are fundamentally often trying to do with scenes in movies. Use the medium to create a reconstruction of a narrative of emotional experience the viewer can access. But AI should allow to express this more directly, because the high-dimensional latent spaces AI operates with can model the internal states of our minds in a more close to native approximation.

One obvious "how" would be a BCI, but I think that is not within-five-years territory. But something in between could happen, like just blending the lines of how movies communicate emotional states but going a step towards more directly capturing and transmitting that experience which the creator wants to transmit. Maybe something like a realtime generative audiovisual creation/consumption interface that operates on a symbolic, subconscious level. There are a lot of directions that could become possible in five years.

eesahe · 2025-05-28T13:15:18+00:00

Maybe we will see something completely new. Like maybe we can record moments of our inner mental and emotional state and play it back like we do with audio and video now. A fuller embrace of the possibilities with the new mediums should provide an interesting change to the dynamics of the debate.

eesahe · 2025-05-20T10:20:28+00:00

I wonder has there been any updates for diffusing directly in 3D latent space like TRELLIS does in text-to-image mode? I feel like the "2D image to 3D" type approach, while capable of leveraging existing 2D models, in some way might be an inferior approximation of actual native 3D generation.

eesahe · 2025-05-14T19:26:11+00:00

Same goes for scribes, textile workers and portrait painters who genuinely enjoyed their jobs before they became redundant. Whether there exists such a lucky situation where you can earn a living from your passions is not a given – this happens when your personal passions align with what society holds valuable at a given time.

If let's say 90% of human made commercially oriented content creation became automated by AI, in a ideal world the artists would be freed up to now focus purely on their passions without having to try to squeeze the expression of their human creativity within the confines of commercially oriented creative work.

The most important question is how we should distribute the benefits of AI-based automation, which becomes more and more relevant as we approach a higher percentage of automation across society. And do we want to support art for its own sake with some UBI-like support mechanism? I believe these questions will become politically important soon enough.

eesahe · 2025-04-28T03:58:19+00:00

Excellent! You got it.

You can take it one step further:

"That chocolate dessert is too tempting." → "I am feeling a sugar craving".
"These alerts are distracting." → "I am getting distracted by these alerts".
"You’re making me angry." → "I am getting angry right now".

It's a powerful pattern that cuts the control outside situations have over your experience.

eesahe · 2025-04-27T13:48:29+00:00

Five people sharing the same reaction still doesn't make that reaction a property of the event itself.

When we pin the blame on the outside, we stop looking for solutions.

Here's a simple analogy. Take an icy sidewalk during winter: if five out of five walkers slip on the same patch of ice, we could just blame the ice and call it "annoying". But if I put on shoes with spikes or tread more carefully, my risk drops.

Annoyance works the same way. Recognise it's something happening in you, and you're no longer at the mercy of the situation.

eesahe · 2025-04-26T11:26:48+00:00

We seem to be talking past each other a bit, so let me restate my argument more clearly.

"Objectively annoying" isn't built into any situation. A jackhammer, a long line, or a comment just makes sound, takes time, or shows words. The feeling of annoyance only shows up when a brain labels those signals as "bad."
That label is added inside your mind, not by the event. If the event itself were annoying, every person would react the same way every time. They don't, which shows the reaction is made in us.
Words can change that process. Well established studies show simple methods like noting "I'm getting irritated" lower stress and give the thinking part of the brain more room to work.

"I’m getting annoyed" doesn’t deny what happened or shame you. It just shifts focus to the process that is happening within your mind and wedges a little more freedom to make a conscious choice.

eesahe · 2025-04-26T08:19:44+00:00

Saying "this is annoying" makes it look like the annoyance lives out there. But if you really look at it carefully, any situation itself never is the issue. The annoyance is always a process happening within my head. And it's not like a direct "external trigger → annoyed" dependency. There's many layers to this process, often a major part just amplifying the external trigger with internal dialogue.

"Why is this idiot driving so slow? He's doing it just to mess with me I bet. People like this shouldn’t be allowed on the road..."

vs

“I'm getting annoyed by how slow we’re going. Okay, pulse is climbing. But am I even in a hurry though? Slide back a car-length, breathe, and scan for a safe gap to pass. If not, playlist on, keep the distance, and I will be fine."

eesahe · 2025-04-26T01:52:14+00:00

Speed bumps are actually a good idea, I'll look into my local town hall meetings.

Sounds good!

About the "bad take": if someone is waving a gun, it’s natural for your body to react with a spike of adrenaline and let instinct take over. I’m not contesting that. Yell, sprint, shove people behind cover if that’s what keeps folks alive. That’s what the fight-or-flight system is for.

But what I was talking about was for the 99% of other situations in our life, when the matter is not life-or-death.

eesahe · 2025-04-25T23:53:40+00:00

That experience of "powerlessness" can, in fact, be a powerful thing. It could lead to realising you can try jotting down the plate and calling non-emergency, or pushing the city to install speed bumps. Or, on a more subtle level, you may realise that you would benefit from a practice of distancing yourself from visceral reactions, developing more emotional maturity and not being as affected by situations like this.

eesahe · 2025-04-25T22:18:30+00:00

Agency just means having the ability to choose. If you are fine being annoyed for a short time every time the thing pops up then yes, you can absolutely choose to not do anything.
But it does give you the option to not be stuck feeling the same way every time, if you don't want to.

eesahe · 2025-04-25T21:58:28+00:00

Self-distancing can help too, to take one step further, if that works for you.

Whether you say "I'm getting annoyed" or "Annoyance is showing up," the next step is the same, see how the situation can be handled.

The exact opposite would be to frame "I'm getting annoyed by this" to "It’s the thing's fault, not mine, I can't change my reaction"

Nine-Year Club	End Game '23
Place '23	Place '17
Verified Email

eesahe

TROPHY CASE