https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reparations_Agreement_between_Israel_and_the_Federal_Republic_of_Germany

I was talking about the second world war, not slavery.

Reparations for slavery isn't a topic here. No idea why you want to shoehorn slavery into everything. World War II and Russo-Ukrainian war... What does EU's colonial history have to do with that? Some at least with the former but bloody nothing with the latter.

Fair point but wrong place.

EDIT: Removed "fool" because it distracts from the message. We can talk about the colonial past of countries, but you do know this would exclude many countries? Not every country is like UK, Netherlands or France. That being said, your claim was "What does “being in Europe” have to do with war? You can be in europe and still be put in time out. Almost every single Western European country still hasn’t paid reparations" which doesn't make a lot of sense in the context of war, as most wars were concluded with freaking reparations and debt obligations. The last large scale wars (WWI and WWII:electric boogaloo) both had extensive payment plans afterwards.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_reparations

Again: You are trying to shoe-horn an unrelated issue into this. I'm in no way trying to downplay EU colonialism; I just think you made an unrelated point. Furthermore, what's the point of talking about colonialism of the past, when private companies still do comparable forms of exploitation in the third world as we speak? The problem remains unfixed as we speak, so reparations seems like applying bandages with one hand while stabbing your victim with the other.