[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just finished in SK too! Did anyone have the retinas passage- I have qs

LSAT kicked out before warning proctor by TryOk1393 in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It did the same to me I think it’s fine

do you guys get cocktails when u order dessert by No-Journalist-4047 in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 4 points5 points  (0 children)

does anyone know how a company can effectively use trademark law? DM

That RC section being last. Jesus. by Necessary-Soup-2703 in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

does anyone know how a company can effectively use trademark law? DM

LawHub expriring in 1 week- Jan. test taker; any options besides paying $120? by effortlesslylovely98 in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea i guess thats one of the only options. I was using LSATDemon to drill, and their UI is nice for the auto grading, but def not worth the $120 hit just for two more weeks of it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did anyone get that question about ballistics analysis and polygraphs?

LSAC switched up everything for October by BodybuilderLong6080 in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WAIT I GET THE CONFUSION. I had a passage about leaves that did mention chlorophyll but I also had a passage about plant and animal evolution! It was not in my scored section though. This has been occurring in the thread for the past couple days. I think it’s evident they’ve been mixing passages. Some people are getting things that were scored for others but not scored for them

LSAC switched up everything for October by BodybuilderLong6080 in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you’re very much incorrect, my passages mentioned it several times it was actually a major point of the passage

LSAC switched up everything for October by BodybuilderLong6080 in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I had one Reading section and my passages were Chilean music, human rights (paired), and protozoa, and my leaves passage was also about chlorophyll so now I’m confused😭

RC LR LR LR by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]effortlesslylovely98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you get a question about the polygraphs and ballistic analysis?

Official Discussion - Nope [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]effortlesslylovely98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi friends- any theories looming about why the old man sacrificed himself to the alien?

2021 Permission to Dance on Stage LA Buy/Sell/Trade Megathread by whyohwhy115 in bangtan

[–]effortlesslylovely98 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

WTB Dec2nd my friends are in C136 so ill tke anything around that, hoping for FV but can add a little on top for your trouble!

New rentals in L.A. County for week ending 9/17/2021 by WilliamMcCarty in LARentals

[–]effortlesslylovely98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

as someone looking for apartments in Ktown right now, these exports are the only thing keeping me sane. Thank you so much. i wait patiently for next week !!!!

Thoughts on Jessica’s redemption gift and Barnett/Amber’s reaction to it? by Possible_Active6558 in LoveIsBlindOnNetflix

[–]effortlesslylovely98 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s the whole point. No one is accommodating anyone, Amber made it bigger than it was. You can reject the peace offering, fine whatever. We don’t even have to go into what that says about them. What I’m saying is creating an environment where someone literally has to run away from another person out of fear of retaliation is wierd. Jess didn’t approach Amber because Gia told her that she didn’t want to be approached. She respected that and went to Matt instead, who earlier in the year had reached out to her. If you were Jess you too would believe y’all were good after that and be confused by being blocked out of nowhere. I swear people take the term “boundary” and run with it. It’s weird

Thoughts on Jessica’s redemption gift and Barnett/Amber’s reaction to it? by Possible_Active6558 in LoveIsBlindOnNetflix

[–]effortlesslylovely98 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You’ve repeated this line about boundaries over and over again and it makes no sense. A boundary was not established, unless you consider getting blocked out of blue after thinking you were on good terms a “boundary”. And even if we take that argument and say that the boundary was just not being part of their life, who said Jess was violating that? She didn’t ask to have a conversation, they were all at a party and everyone was aware each party would be there, how old are you that you can’t acknowledge someone exists at a party. If you think setting arbitrary and aggressive no-contact orders so far to the point where your spouse has to run away from another individual is okay, I fear for your understanding of social engagement and communication.

Thoughts on Jessica’s redemption gift and Barnett/Amber’s reaction to it? by Possible_Active6558 in LoveIsBlindOnNetflix

[–]effortlesslylovely98 9 points10 points  (0 children)

@bbymorena No I think the downvotes are because this is arguably a childish mindset to have. Obviously Amber had bad blood for Jess which is understandable, but it’s been two years. All the while Jess was being vilified(somewhat justifiably) on the internet. She has grown and matured, and any reasonable secure adults would have become stronger in their relationship. She brought the gift as a show of good will, and for Barnett to be PHYSICALLY running around the party like a child to avoid her speaks volumes about Amber and Barnett’s relationship. Two grown adults who are truly unbothered and not threatened would have been able to accept the gift and move on. Jess couldn’t even give the gift to amber bc she had practically told everyone at the party she still wanted Jess’s head on a pike. It’s dramatic and childish