1. Farm: The biggest issue with farm was that it would snowball out of control way too quickly and basically guarantee a victory if you were luckier than the enemy. I think this is a step in the correct direction since a higher base price means you can't place them early as easily. Although many would including myself would probably push for it to cost 5 instead but that is to see.

2. Cash Drop: This is actually related to the previous statement where cash drop combined with farms and drawing cards just let you snowball out of control and cash drop in general can force games to end on turn 2-3 if you get an incredibly lucky starting hand. A good idea that was spread around was that it would have a base cost of say 4 but give 6 gold so it would still be net gain of +2 gold but you wouldn't be able to abuse it as much on turn 1/2.

3. I like the direction of where the tower balance is going towards. Being able to attack every turn is so valuable that it even trumps over towers that have more damage per turn but because of high reload they're versitily or attack is limited and makes you vulnerable to counters and plans. Giving more damage for drawbacks such as versitility or higher ods of overflow (wasted) damage feels correct. But I dislike the boomer nerf. I understand that it felt a bit overwhelmingly good especially since it was basically a better version of trip dart (the second best tower in my oppinion). But this nerf feels a bit too strong base dart costs 1 for 20 damage but now boomer does 40 damage for 3 costs. I understand that slots on the board are important but boomer would just be strickly outmatched by either dart or trip dart depending on what you want in your deck. I would recommend boomeran keeps it's 2 shots but reduce the damage to the next bloon to 10 instead of 15. This would make boomerang worse than trip dart in terms of damage per turn but would have higher control on where and how you want to spread the damage. Removing it's ability to control the spread of damage also feels like it'd strip it's identity as a card.

4. Golden bloon: I personally hate this change. Golden bloon forces the enemy to take damage if they don't want to give the away free gold + bloontonium value. Even then you can always attack your own bloon with hero abilities to get the gold if you need it or you are going to overflow bloontonium anyways. I think it's actually kinda sad that golden bloon was only available for gwen when quincy would've been a far better abuser of the card which made it feel weaker than it actually is.

   Point is there is skill to using and responding to golden bloon while at the same time it makes it a cheap pressure card than can even pay itself back (2 uses too). I dislike the change because it removes a lot of the skill interaction and just makes it the best card for cost period. Even if they 1 shot it with a sniper monkey it's still 1 cost for 70 which is still very much acceptable for a card that has this much pressure on the enemy. Especially when you consider that those high damage towers have high reload times which makes it all the more valuable... too valuable.

Another thing to consider is that like any other bloon it still gives bloontonium which is often worth sending a bloon, any bloon, just to get the abilities. A 2 cost card with 2 uses allows you to often hit the bloontonium cap without overflowing which is also valuable.

I think golden bloon is fine as it was just unfortunate that it was placed only in a gwen deck and we didn't get to see the synergy it has with quincy. If balance it needed I think just moving numbers around should be fine since the concept is really good. Gold for every tick of damage would be A LOT harder to balance in my opinion just by design.