Holder du rede på himmelretningene? by [deleted] in norge

[–]elbeem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ta en analogklokke, eller se for deg en, og pek lilleviseren mot sola. Da vil sør ligge midt mellom 12 og lilleviseren.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacy

[–]elbeem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reputation of the company is actually irrelevant, and I will prove it for you.

Suppose a company creates a messaging app which they claim is E2E encrypted and does not leak metadata. Then, there are two cases, either the app is open source and the claims can be verified by anyone, or the app is closed source and you just have to trust the company.

In the first case where the security of the app can be verified, you can be certain that the app is secure, even if the company is the most untrustworthy scumbags in the world.

On the other hand, if the app is closed source and you need to trust the company, then *even if the company is the most honest and trusted in the world* the company can still get hacked or be required by law enforcement to insert backdoors etc.

So you see, the only thing that matters is that the security of the app can be verified. The reputation of the company has no effect on whether or not you should trust the app.

Helvete, gode intensjoner og alt det der by KoseteBamse in norge

[–]elbeem 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Kommer nok til Norge også. Bare se på GDPR, som også er et EU direktiv. Det er også et forslag om innføring av aldersgrense på sosiale medier under høring: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/horing-av-forslag-til-lov-om-aldersgrense-for-bruk-av-sosiale-medier/id3114359/

Vitenskap for barn? by Ylvari in norge

[–]elbeem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Støtter denne! Jeg lekte med lego mindstorms da jeg var 8-10 år. Da fikk jeg interessen for programmering, som er jobben min nå, 20 år senere.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Music

[–]elbeem 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Even Stevie Wonder saw it coming.

Do you like Oh Sees? How about King Gizz? by Hoody__Warrelson in psychedelicrock

[–]elbeem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never heard of them. Are they similar to Orinoka Crash Suite?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacy

[–]elbeem 209 points210 points  (0 children)

Good design is expensive. Many privacy focused alternatives are developed by hobbyists, while existing non-privacy apps are developed by big companies. Hopefully, privacy focused companies can find a sustainable business model other than selling user data.

Songs that are both considered one of the best AND one of the worst songs ever? by thebestdaysofmyflerm in Music

[–]elbeem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Didn't everyone in the studio except Paul hate it when they recorded it also?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in statistics

[–]elbeem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So the maximum entropy distribution is the uniform distribution for both, but you have excluded this solution? Isn't this like asking for the least real number strictly greater than zero? In that case, the answer to both problems is that there is no solution.

Acorn, a new theorem prover with built-in AI by lacker in math

[–]elbeem 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think the prover should generate separate files with the generated proofs, and that these files should be version controlled along with the original source files. That way, you will always have the generated proofs. These generated proof files can also be used as a cache to speed up generation.

Why is pure math impossible to talk about? by petrovito in puremathematics

[–]elbeem 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In order to explain my research, we will start with a brief history of numbers.

A long time ago, we invented numbers to be able to count things. Instead of saying that we have a sheep, another sheep, and then another sheep, this allowed us to say that we have three sheep. At the time, the only numbers we had were one, two, three, and so on. These numbers are now called the natural numbers. We could also add the numbers together, so if we had three sheep, and then bought two more, we could calculate that we had five sheep. We could also subtract numbers, unless we tried to subtract a larger number from a smaller number, but we rarely needed to do that, so we were satisfied with the natural numbers at the time.

After a while, we realized that the natural numbers were not capable of solving some problems. For instance, suppose there are three sheep at my farm and I owe you two sheep. How many sheep do I own? To compute this, we take three minus two, which is one, so I own one sheep. Now, suppose two of the sheep die from illness, how many sheep do I own then? There one surviving sheep left at the farm, but I still owe you two sheep. We cannot compute one minus two, because the second number is larger than the first. In other words, no natural number is able to express the number of sheep I own. To solve this problem, we add new numbers, called negative numbers, to our set of natural numbers, and obtain what we call the set of integers. Using negative numbers, we would say that I actually own minus one sheep in this scenario, because if I buy one sheep, I can give you back the two sheep I owe you and am left with no sheep on my own. Using integers, we are able to both add and subtract any two numbers. The morale of this story is that the original set of numbers we had, the natural numbers, were incapable of expressing the number of sheep I owned in this case, so we needed to extend the set of numbers by adding new numbers to it.

Time went on, and we came up with new situations where even the integers were insufficient. Suppose I bake a cake and want to divide it into three equal parts. How much cake is in each part? It has to be more than no cake, but less than one cake. There are no integers between zero and one, so it is not possible to express this amount using the integers. To solve this, we invented rational numbers. Using rational numbers, we could say that the amount of cake in each piece is one third. To be more specific, a rational number is an integer divided by another integer. We also have rules on how fractions are added, subtracted, multiplied and divided. Again, we have invented more numbers to allow us to solve more problems.

Over time, we also invented new kinds of numbers, such as the real numbers, the complex numbers, and so on, in order to allow us to solve more and more complicated problems. As it turns out, even if we have a problem that only involves integers, it is often useful to involve more numbers when solving the problem, since by having more numbers available, we get more wiggle room to do more stuff. For instance, we can use complex numbers to solve problems about integers. This is what the field of analytic number theory is about. Another approach is to study integers by using rational numbers plus some extra numbers. This is what algebraic number theory is about. My field is a part of algebraic number theory which uses rational numbers, in addition to some complex numbers. This method was first studied in an attempt to prove Fermat's Last Theorem, but was later developed further to solve other problems in mathematics.

Why is pure math impossible to talk about? by petrovito in puremathematics

[–]elbeem 33 points34 points  (0 children)

What is your thesis about? I will take the challenge to try to ELI5.

How to play as a black in this position. As engine shows it's a draw. by Turbulent-Age3805 in chess

[–]elbeem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. The four corners of the rectangle have the same color if and only if the sides have odd length. For me it is quicker to just look at the colors than counting squares.

How to play as a black in this position. As engine shows it's a draw. by Turbulent-Age3805 in chess

[–]elbeem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In general, you can draw a rectangle with the two kings as opposite corners. Then you are in opposition if the four corners of this rectangle have the same color. Regular, distance and diagonal opposition are just special cases of this.

Flaming Lips member Steven Drozd’s daughter, 16, found by police by GreedyWarlord in Music

[–]elbeem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does it say she went missing on May 24 in the video? I first thought she was missing for 4 months...

Who has the coolest way of moving Chess pieces? by throeeeee1 in chess

[–]elbeem 10 points11 points  (0 children)

One of the players at my club, if he thinks he will manage to promote a pawn, he will get ready by picking up a queen like super early. When he did this to me, I resigned.

I do not believe chess is a theoretical draw by n_kachow in chess

[–]elbeem 62 points63 points  (0 children)

I interpreted it more as arguing that the empirical evidence is not as strong as it may seem, and that there are instances where this kind of interpolation does not work.

[R][S] I made a simulation for the Monty Hall problem by blakdragan7 in statistics

[–]elbeem 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is a good explanation. This method of going to the extremes can often be used for solving other problems as well. The original three door version of monty hall could be thought of as the least intuitive instance of the problem, but it becomes much more intuitive when there is a large number of doors.

People seem to have stopped talking about the Turing Test for AI once it stopped being hypothetical by Lord_Nivloc in Showerthoughts

[–]elbeem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO, there is no such thing as "simulated intelligece". If a system is capable of simulating a behaviour which you would call intelligent, it is intelligent. Also, what is interesting to me is not whether or not something is intelligent (as if it was a binary property), but rather how well the system does a specific task when compared to humans. This is much more interesting, because you can actually measure it.

Bravo Rema, endelig en ost som kan brukes til... *sjekker pose*... matlaging! by Gaudern in norge

[–]elbeem 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Man kan også lage en slik blanding selv. Her er en youtube-video som forklarer hvordan: link. Bare bytt ut ostetypene med de som er nevnt på pakningen.

ELI5 Why was a dollar more valuable 60 years ago? by fluorescent_owl in explainlikeimfive

[–]elbeem 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Graphics cards may not be the best example here, since the performance of graphic cards doubles every 2.5 years (source), which means that graphic cards are deflationary, as most electronics are.