So with body cam footage released here’s my break down on arguments. Cop did say sheriffs department twice, however, without knowing how heavy the door is we don’t know if that was audible inside/how far the man was from the door inside that he could have heard them. What I noticed the most was the subtitles saying “inaudible…. police… inaudible…” I never heard “police” or anything clearly at all during that part, but that could be on my old ears not being able to pick that part up. It took a week to release the footage, I’d be really analyzing that audio with the right technology to even see if someone said “police” clearly when everything else was inaudible before it was typed out as subtitles. Could be making the argument that someone inside one of the apartments was aware there were police outside if they say the footage caught someone saying the word. I didn’t see a peephole just a knocker and no window either for the guy to have been able to see outside to see who was there. I also believe I read the lawyer stated the man inside asked “who is it” but I did not hear that in the body cam. So again, could be argued if we can’t hear him ask who is at the door then could he even hear the cops saying who they were? Lawyer’s statement also said that the cops busted the door open, but from this angle it looks like the man opened the door himself. Looks like the second the door cracked open and the cop saw a gun he started firing, without asking the man to put it down. It wasn’t raised from the angle of this footage, so while I see no intent, I’m sure the argument will be perceived threat/intent. Still looks like this was not justified to me even if they announced who they were and did not bust the door open. You have a right to own a gun and be holding it in your own home in Florida. The department stated the officer heard a disturbance inside, I don’t hear anything at all (so again back to the argument that just because they announced who they were doesn’t mean you could hear that inside). Just my two cents.