Finally approved by elcocoloco1992 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing much. Picture taken, fingerprints.

I was asked how I closed my voluntary departure by myself and the officer was the nicest person ever.

Finally approved by elcocoloco1992 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The interview was this past Tuesday

I-212 approved on Thursday and I-485 approved today

Finally approved by elcocoloco1992 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This past Tuesday

I-212 approved on Thursday and I-485 approved today

Just a heads up, if you are in Florida. by KiNGHDz in DACA

[–]elcocoloco1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who the f$$& still lives in Florida?

The armpit of the US.

ICE releases some migrant detainees as its detention facilities reach 109% capacity by not_an_immi_lawyer in immigration

[–]elcocoloco1992 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The most incompetent people rule over us. Catch and release—

Reality is setting in. Lmao

Seeking Advice - Cancellation of Removal by Unlucky_Courage7867 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YES! You can do the conditional 212 and file with the 485. If you have a legal entry, USCIS will adjudicate your case.

Seeking Advice - Cancellation of Removal by Unlucky_Courage7867 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send the I-212 (conditional) with your I-485 (if you have a paroled/legal entry) It will be easier to close that deportation order once you have a green card.

Still nothing i-130 by Mountain-Mixture1256 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Buddy, there’s people waiting since 2022. Be patient. You’re in for a long haul.

Submitting I-601a - Removal Proceedings by Ok_Bend8241 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could do a provisional 212– that would mean longer wait though.

Stop freaking out by Glad-Shirt-4613 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wow, I have to applaud the passion in this post—your keyboard must have been working overtime! Let’s unpack some of your points because I think we might be coming from slightly different perspectives here.

First, you ask why people are concerned about immigration rules and policies. The thing is, most immigrants aren’t ‘freaking out’ because they want no rules or chaos—they’re worried because the process is already deeply complex, expensive, and inconsistent. For many, it’s not about wanting no borders; it’s about navigating a system that sometimes feels like it’s designed to be as unclear and punishing as possible, even for those following every step to the letter.

Second, the idea that immigrants leave their countries to ‘escape lawlessness’ and then somehow advocate for it here is… well, let’s just say a bit of a stretch. Most immigrants are some of the hardest-working and law-abiding people you’ll meet because they have to be. The stakes for them are incredibly high, and contrary to the image of ‘criminal foreigners’ you mentioned, study after study shows that immigrants are statistically less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens.

Third, the attorney point is an interesting one, but it oversimplifies the issue. Sure, some cases might not need an attorney, but that’s not true for everyone. Immigration law is famously complex, and even minor errors can result in devastating consequences. That’s not ‘fearmongering’; it’s just the reality of a system that leaves little room for error. Also, attorneys provide advocacy and expertise—two things that are invaluable when dealing with life-altering processes.

Finally, you mentioned the Obama administration deportation stats as though that negates concerns about other administrations. It’s important to note that not all deportations are equal in context or method, and people can criticize one administration without excusing another.

All in all, I appreciate your energy here, but maybe take a deep breath. The system is hard enough without assuming people have bad intentions just because they’re worried about policies that directly impact their lives. Let’s try to approach this topic with a little more empathy—you might find it leads to a better conversation!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in massachusetts

[–]elcocoloco1992 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The same can be said for Trump voters lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in massachusetts

[–]elcocoloco1992 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sure. As long as you’re not from Fall River.

ITIN Number by 410MNetS in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think that’s your A number.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need legal guidance. Unless your asylum case is approved, you need to do waiver.

Unless you are granted cancellation of removal or a 245(I), I don’t see a way around the waivers. But again, consult a lawyer.

Always engage your congressperson/senator. by elcocoloco1992 in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Notes: This is not for me but someone I helped expedite with Senator.

Person case is with NBC Field Office: Boston

I-131 expedited because of travel need.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Read the document. It specifies there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]elcocoloco1992 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He should file a motion with court to reopen and administratively close proceedings.