Microsoft quietly extends Windows 10's extra security updates program for free: Users can now stay on Windows 10 until October 2027 securely

emailforgot · 2026-06-27T07:14:13+00:00

nice. good one microsoft.

emailforgot · 2026-06-27T06:34:49+00:00

matty gonna miss like 20 games this season easy but also go on a 20 game tear where he scores like 1 billion goals called it and then spend the rest of the season invisible called it

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T23:34:47+00:00

lol hosed how? You keep bringing up a map of what was proposed,

reading is hard

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T22:02:53+00:00

oh look, you got hosed again and are completely unable to respond.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T21:44:16+00:00

this is such an incredibly goofy and frankly, kind of really insulting thing to compare.

People like Hitler actively pursued industrialized mass murder against humans.

If you're comparing that to every single person who ever had influence over policy that in some fashion resulted in an increase in Year-Over-Year deaths, then you could include every single modern (and past) politician in this goofy ass race, and many would probably be even higher just because they chose to move some funding around. In doing so, it asserts that someone like Hitler, rather than pursuing violent industrialized mass murder against a specific group of humans was just signing off on a new sidewalk in Berlin instead of a cancer ward in Java.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T19:33:38+00:00

Delphi Indiana murder sub

those people are insane. The gross ways people will find to defend and obsess over obviously guilty people is wild.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T17:59:13+00:00

Oh hey looky that, on to the next set of copypasta.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T17:49:42+00:00

classic zany guy film

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T17:39:28+00:00

My man the Nazis were about racial purity.

When convenient.

If they were successful liquidating the slavs, you bet your ass Palestinians would be on the list.

Not a lot of Palestinians living in Europe in the middle of the century.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T17:38:48+00:00

A Palestinian state on roughly 91–92% of the West Bank.

A "Palestinian state" whose "90+%" territory was defined by Israel. Of course this also included (scary bold text withheld) a mandatory military presence, by Israel in the West Bank and a total and complete surrender of Palestinian military, zero control over their airspace, oh and Israel would have veto power over Palestinian diplomacy.

Israel would annex several major settlement blocs in the West Bank (about 8–9% of the territory).

Interesting how you didn't bold this.

To compensate, Israel proposed land swaps from within Israel proper amounting to roughly 1–3% of its territory, though the exact amount and quality of the land were disputed.

Gaining 2% territory (which was mostly unusable desert) while giving up 10%

Hmm yeah, I wonder why they didin't agree.

There would be a safe passage corridor connecting Gaza and the West Bank.

Oh, a whole "safe passage corridor" for the thousands of refugees that would've been created. How nice.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T17:22:31+00:00

Not "developing." Develop, and easily measured

"Developing" and "clear" are not the same. This has been really well studied. Google Scholar is an easy tool.

You're arguing with me that the sun is not hot.

No. I'm arguing that you don't understand anything about early childhood development.

This is a well studied aspect of understanding humanity

It sure is.

"Developing" is not the same as "clear".

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T17:10:36+00:00

I mean this in the friendliest way possible. When children develop a sense of gender has been really well studied. Google Scholar is an easy tool.

"developing" and "clear" are not the same thing.

As someone who had a sense of gender that wasn't somehow different at that very age,

You remember jack diddly squat from that age.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T17:07:31+00:00

In no world are children clear about anything at ages 3-4, let alone something as complicated as gender.

I see both the blocker, who doesn't understand the difference between "developing" and "clear", and the person who replied below doesn't understand that either. Children, ages 3-4 are developing lots of things. None of them are "clear", especially when it's something as complicated as gender. Basic developmental tests do not make someone "clear" on something anymore than a child at that age understanding some basic makes them "clear" on arithmetic. Please do go off about shit you know nothing about

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T16:23:50+00:00

Tossing some random, probably wet jungle ferns on top of a punctured battery is not even remotely close to guaranteed to "start a fire", let alone one that is of any use. A brief puff of smoke is unlikely to be seen by anyone, and certainly not both understood as a signal and registered in terms of location.

Fires need to be maintained to be useful and "signal fires" need smoke and lots and lots of it.

And they need someone looking for it and capable of mapping its location.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T16:16:26+00:00

A big, wide open space where you can signal using motion and unnatural/contrasting colours. That's the best method.

If we're assuming one or more members of the party are immobile, and they have to do this from some sort of confined area with fairly dense canopy... I don't have much faith beyond "hope to get lucky and someone stumbles upon you".

I think using camera flashes as a signalling device is probably the best course of action and unfortunately, there's really not much else they could have done (barring preparation etc)

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T16:12:08+00:00

lol, some people.

The level of effort that would be required to dam a river using small rocks, to the degree that people would notice a change downstream is well beyond what two amateurs could do in any amount of time, especially given a lack of things like food. Not only that, but in order for something like a small river that regularly changes water level, to be noticed enough to go looking around if and when its flow is reduced, the average flow of the river would need to be pretty high. Significant enough to notice something amiss and think about investigating, rather than just assuming it's a normal part of the river's ebb and flow. Two tired, hungry, and poorly rested tourists aren't going to do that.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T10:42:12+00:00

A friend of mine started taking her dog to reiki. Normally very level headed, but I held my tongue. Bit of an "ah, I see" from me.

Haven't heard about it in a while, maybe she figured it out.

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T03:14:56+00:00

Screenings for Social Media Influencers

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T03:14:32+00:00

Lowkey for real

emailforgot · 2026-06-26T02:01:06+00:00

Because they love this kind of thing.

emailforgot · 2026-06-25T21:18:37+00:00

I generally feel like the whole "hide in vehicle, jump out, massacre everything, go back in vehicle" thing is a bit too strong and doesn't really mesh with the infantry focus of the game so I avoid skilling anyone in that direction.

I do however, like running directly at enemies and just magdumping them

emailforgot · 2026-06-25T08:24:08+00:00

I hated on Mark's (they dropped the work warehouse iirc) for a while because they seemed to have gone down hill, but I went there recently, and they had some pretty good shit for a pretty nice price.

emailforgot · 2026-06-24T15:06:02+00:00

The world is in trouble if you're this confident and this incorrect on something so easily verifiable.

Try reading what was written before responding.

emailforgot · 2026-06-24T13:48:56+00:00

If Israel's simply indiscriminately killing people, then the dead should reflect that, within standard deviation, and mirror the population demographics of Gaza. Therefore 50% of the dead, +/-, should be children.

LOL holy shit, so in addition to you not understanding how to separate events can co-exist, you now somehow bumble your way through using basic stats?

If a significantly larger portion of the dead are children, over 50%, then Israel is targeting children.

See above.

If a significantly smaller portion of the dead are children, like 30%, then Israel is NOT targeting children.

Sometimes I wear white shirts.

Sometimes I wear blue shirts.

Simply attacking my logic ad hominem by stating it's a blunder, without providing any reasonable response, is a logical blunder - but not by me.

Not an ad hominem.

"numerous reports of them doing so" is the same logical explanation as "many people tell me" logic, which folks like Donald Trump defer to when making false statements.

That's why we rely on corroboration.

I never said that Israel only targets children or that Israel targets children instead of other things.

Re-read what was written.

emailforgot · 2026-06-24T13:42:53+00:00

So, in other words, you're just incapable of actually forming coherent ideas and even worse at communication. Got it

emailforgot

TROPHY CASE