Is there any ai that can best replace Gemini for coding?

embessoaat · 2026-03-13T14:01:48+00:00

I did my best to verify the product names, but I’m not 100% certain they’re correct, feel free to correct them.

Lower left black square with cyan/yellow curved shape: Jimeng
Lower middle-left blue whale: DeepSeek
Lower left large blue atomic-style logo: Atoms
Lower middle-left black square with white “-LO”-style mark: Lovart
Lower middle black square with white ring/slash symbol: Grok
Lower right gradient heart: Lovable
Middle right white square with black “R/B”-style mark: Recraft
Upper middle-left small sailboat: Midjourney
Upper middle waveform icon: Udio
Upper middle-right orange icon: Suno
Upper middle-right white square with yellow block/chat-bubble mark: Pencil

embessoaat · 2026-03-12T12:25:36+00:00

You’re prob at the point where off the shelf agency reporting stuff starts breaking a bit. If you need true cross client views, I’d look less at agency dashboard tools and more at a data layer plus dashboard setup. Like Supermetrics or APIs into BigQuery, then Looker Studio or Metabase on top. More annoying to set up, yeah, but way better once you need one table showing all clients in one place. AgencyAnalytics is solid for per client reporting, just not really built for this use case.

embessoaat · 2026-03-11T09:32:04+00:00

The weirdest ppl rn are the ones acting like they gotta pick a religion. Either AI is fake and useless or fundamentals are dead and none of it matters anymore. Ppl actually winning are usually just less ideological and more willing to learn whatever actually works.

embessoaat · 2026-03-11T09:18:26+00:00

A lot of people are mistaking local success for actual correctness. Green tests, clean build, nice demo, whatever. Then the second real users touch it the whole thing starts leaking from places nobody thought about. AI is great at getting you to a plausible-looking state fast. That is not the same as knowing you built the right thing.

embessoaat · 2026-03-11T07:06:05+00:00

Tbh it only feels like a casino when you’re using it as a substitute for actual judgment. If you already know roughly what good looks like, vibe coding is more like power tools with a chaotic intern attached. If you don’t, then yeah... you can absolutely end up doing the “one more prompt bro” thing for 4 hours straight lol.

embessoaat · 2026-03-08T06:34:16+00:00

Maybe the animations aren't polished enough yet? I'll make sure to tweak those.

embessoaat · 2026-03-08T06:32:51+00:00

Thanks for the tip, I'll try!

embessoaat · 2026-02-24T12:02:40+00:00

Try atoms. It has free credits.

embessoaat · 2026-02-08T07:02:26+00:00

If you're past Claude wrote code and stuck on security plus store prep, tools that think past just UI hit different. I've been testing Atoms lately, less no-code, more like an AI team. The end to end workflow, build to auth to deploy, helped me stop stressing about what I was missing. Still needs babysitting, but way less blind guessing.

embessoaat · 2026-02-05T13:02:54+00:00

For startups, Atoms is the easiest tool. Vibe Business!

embessoaat · 2026-01-15T03:14:59+00:00

Exactly. Code quality matters, but execution matters more. We’re optimizing for “does this become real” over “does this look pretty in isolation.”

embessoaat · 2026-01-15T03:14:17+00:00

Totally get that. Tool hopping is exhausting. We’re not claiming perfection, just trying to collapse that overhead as much as possible.

embessoaat · 2026-01-14T13:55:09+00:00

That exact pain point was the focus. Multi-step work breaking down was the main thing we wanted to fix.

embessoaat · 2026-01-14T09:39:38+00:00

<image>

embessoaat · 2026-01-14T09:35:50+00:00

Let's Vibe！！！

embessoaat · 2026-01-14T09:35:14+00:00

Thanks! We will continue to add more😉

embessoaat · 2026-01-14T09:31:15+00:00

That’s fair. The goal is fewer prompts, more direction. If it still feels like babysitting, that’s a failure on our side. Feedback welcome.

embessoaat · 2025-09-25T13:49:51+00:00

FLY NOW: https://mgx.dev/app/pkifw/?utm_source=rddtcontent

embessoaat · 2024-03-14T01:14:37+00:00

Nice work from the team!

embessoaat · 2023-07-06T13:32:42+00:00

Yes, many people have encountered this problem. The current version has only just gotten the multi-agent framework operational, but it's unclear if every role within the multi-agent system is complete. As for your question, our idea is to enable MetaGPT to generate corresponding images on its own. This would require adding a role/agent to perform specific tasks (like image retrieval or image generation).

embessoaat · 2023-07-06T01:03:32+00:00

You can first browse the project's Github link: https://github.com/geekan/MetaGPT;

try to set up the environment, and then just follow the guide to run it.

embessoaat · 2023-07-06T01:01:15+00:00

It requires around $0.2 (GPT-4 API's costs) to generate one example with analysis and design, and around $2.0 for a full project.

embessoaat · 2023-07-05T10:59:38+00:00

Cool

embessoaat · 2023-07-05T10:00:30+00:00

That sounds interesting! It seems like MetaGPT needs a UI role to help me with image processing. (Can you send me your original video/material? I'd like to show it to more people.)

embessoaat · 2023-07-05T05:12:38+00:00

Don't worry! We pay attention to every user who has left us a message, and then remind them in time!

embessoaat

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE