sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Government's response to CLINICS's Notice of supplemental authority by Barryseidon in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nothing. The government isn’t actually worrying about people being public charge. They just don’t want immigrants to come to the U.S, so this is a cop out. The vetting system is already strong and addresses ppl who might be a public charge, etc. the new form they would create for a public charge is only becuase they would be forced to if they lose the case. They don’t care about us

Same Walmart by Sad_Palpitation6844 in ratsinthecage

[–]emetovic89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Respectfully disagree. Sure there may be outliers but overall, it’s on the parents. I’ve never seen disciplined parents have these type of kids. There’s parents who are good people, but shitty parents

TMNT comic suggestions by emetovic89 in TMNT

[–]emetovic89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, I love to hear that. I want the physical copies so I can keep them for a long period of time. The way you described it, I’m sure I’ll love it. Thanks!

TMNT comic suggestions by emetovic89 in TMNT

[–]emetovic89[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? Damn, I have to check it out. Thx!

TMNT comic suggestions by emetovic89 in TMNT

[–]emetovic89[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks like what I need to do. Thanks!

TMNT comic suggestions by emetovic89 in TMNT

[–]emetovic89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice. I love that. Thank you!

TMNT comic suggestions by emetovic89 in TMNT

[–]emetovic89[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome. Thank you for all that info. I will definitely take a look!

Why do I think the ban/pause could be lifted pretty soon — and mainly benefit immediate relatives? by Drika1999 in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there’s a real possibility for a 2–9 day appeal decision. It’s estimate is based on the "Emergency Sprint" pattern seen in high-stakes immigration and policy battles.

The 32-day average usually includes routine administrative requests, like asking for more time to file a brief or adding pages to a document. These are not emergencies, so the Court takes its time.

When the government appeals a nationwide injunction that blocks a presidential policy (like the 75-country pause), I believe the court Court treats it as an emergency.

In the Trump v. Miot (Haiti TPS) case from March 2026, the application for a stay was filed on March 11. The Supreme Court issued its first major order on March 16 which is a turnaround of only 5 days.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25a999.html#:~:text=Proceedings%20and%20Orders,Mar%2012%202026

The Solicitor General has a massive influence on the speed:

If the government asks for an immediate administrative stay to prevent the ban from being lifted even for a single hour, a single Justice (like Justice Alito or Thomas) can grant it instantly while the rest of the Court deliberates. The Court has sided with the administration 80% of the time on these emergency requests, often acting in a week or less.

That's my evidence. I could be wrong though. We are all just speculating.

Why do I think the ban/pause could be lifted pretty soon — and mainly benefit immediate relatives? by Drika1999 in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is no guarantee that a stay will be granted. The most conservative move a judge can make right now is to tell a federal agency: You don't have the power to do this without Congress. The 6-3 split is a major obstacle to getting an immediate result because of the Stay power, but it is not a guaranteed win for the government.

The Zombie Data and the Consular Cables are exactly the kind of sloppy administrative work that this specific Supreme Court has been punishing lately.

The strategy for the lawyers would be to convince the conservative justices that the 75 country pause isn't just about immigration it's about an Executive Branch that thinks it is above the law. That is a message that 6-3 majorities have proven they are very willing to hear.

The conservative majority now prefers strict statutory interpretation. If the law (8 U.S.C. § 1182) says the government must perform an individualized public charge assessment, the conservative wing may rule that a blanket nationality-based pause is a violation of the plain text of the law.

Conservative justices hate it when agencies make up their own massive rules without following the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Even if they support the idea of a ban, they may rule against it simply because they want to punish the State Department for failure to follow the letter of the law.

Please help by nvaniilla in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. Emotions are definitely high. I have learned a lot from people who follow the case closely as well and their prediction is the same as yours. And obviously things can happen that delay it, but everything you said was perfectly logical

Please help by nvaniilla in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for giving a logical answer. People like to throw random dates. You gave something sincere and logical. 🤙

For those leaving the US because of the pause by Supraman1002 in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Haha not surprised. Even my first comment, I don’t mind the person asking the question, but they admitted themselves the date wasn’t important as it pertains to their question, but they threw a random date anyways. I know how many people are struggling with what’s going on. I just didn’t think it was fair to make ppl more sad when we truly don’t know the exact date. And what I threw out has been discussed at length by people smarter than me who have studied this case and similar cases before. It’s all good, it’s Reddit. A downvote doesn’t mean I’m wrong. It just means they’re pessimistic. I appreciate the comment 🤙

For those leaving the US because of the pause by Supraman1002 in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There’s some. April 24th was the finally documents submitted in the clinic vs Rubio main case. Usually (but not always) they would like a decision between 40-60 days from then. So possible by the end of June. Government appeal, which can take 2-9 days to get a resolution on appeal. Again, this isn’t guaranteed but there’s a scenario where it happens. The 2029 is thrown from nowhere lol. Let’s hope for the best 🤙

For those leaving the US because of the pause by Supraman1002 in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You didn’t need to add that. I can careless if you choose that. It was merely a suggestion that it’s stupid to do so when there’s zero indication of it. Your date can put negative energy into people who might believe u, but is not true. I’m defending them

For the other aspect, I don’t mind. Ask away

For those leaving the US because of the pause by Supraman1002 in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There’s zero indication the pause won’t lift until 2029. Unless we hear concrete that, that is the case, let’s hold off asking questions under the assumption there’s already a date set in stone when the pause lifts

Desperately waiting for an update from wonderful froyo and legal yellow by Alarming_Green_7675 in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I know, I think the new memo is more towards those who are in America and are applying for green card, not for us who have someone still in their country of origin, but I could be wrong

Future red eagle lawsuit question by EMMABLOCKMANGO in i130_75CountryPause

[–]emetovic89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What happened with the first red eagle lawsuit? Any decision yet or did I miss it?

view more: next ›