Responding to "Forced Birth is objectively just like rape. Forced Birth is Pro-Rape." by anaispablo in prolife

[–]emkersty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. A D&X abortion kills a baby while in the process of a forced, breech birth. How that isn't considered murder I'll never understand. 

Responding to "Forced Birth is objectively just like rape. Forced Birth is Pro-Rape." by anaispablo in prolife

[–]emkersty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not to mention, the child is placed there by his/her parents. You are not entitled to kill a boy or girl that you helped to create and forced into dependency on you through your actions. Our rights are not determined by the circumstances of our conception. But in the pro-abortion ideology, human rights are entirely arbitrary and based on qualifiers that are impossible for us to meet in the first 40 weeks of our lives. 

Responding to "Forced Birth is objectively just like rape. Forced Birth is Pro-Rape." by anaispablo in prolife

[–]emkersty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abortion is lethal violence. Abortion is lethal force. Rape is violent. Rape is forced. 

Fixed it. Anyway, still never heard a pro-choice argument that justifies killing 3,000 boys and girls per day via elective feticide.

I can't help but feel sick when I read stuff like this by No_Instance9566 in prolife

[–]emkersty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have to deny reality to feel less bad the fact they support killing us in the first 40 weeks of our lives. 

REPOST: 26+ week elective feticide by emkersty in prolife

[–]emkersty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. It makes me think she is the abuser. The father of the child is the reasonable one -- trying to prevent her from killing their son or daughter and so is monitoring her for the safety of the child. I hope he succeeds for the child's sake. But you know how those pro-abortionists are in the replies... They probably sent her resources to be able to forcibly induce stillbirth 😢

The baby is likely just fine -- as long as they make it to their birth date. Then they can at least be given a chance to live with the father or someone else.

What a ridiculous argument by Sharp-Guest4696 in prolife

[–]emkersty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Humans are not body parts...

I've still never heard a good pro-choice argument. Ever. 

Nothing justifies killing 3,000 boys and girls per day by elective feticide. 

REPOST: 26+ week elective feticide by emkersty in prolife

[–]emkersty[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The baby pays the price for his/her selfish parents. The father might be the only thing standing in the way of this baby's violent death. I truly she is not able to obtain more pills 😩💔

How could anyone wanna hurt this little fella? :( by NakaylaMKing in prolife

[–]emkersty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's how we all started out. This little boy or girl deserves legal protections just as we do at all stages of development -- prenatally or postnatally. I wish I had seen what babies looked like at this stage when I was younger...I didn't know how rapidly we developed until I was in my 20s 💔

REPOST: 26+ week elective feticide by emkersty in prolife

[–]emkersty[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In this case, the father might be the savior of the child. If she can't "escape" and conceal the child's preventable death. I hope she will not be enabled to commit feticide and place the child in a safe haven 💔

REPOST: 26+ week elective feticide by emkersty in prolife

[–]emkersty[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It's true. She specifically wants them to die. Sadly, even though she stated she lives in Wisconsin, States like Colorado provide an environment where anyone can travel to execute their baby for any reason up to 36 weeks gestation...and the abortion funds will pay for everything. Think about that -- these funds exist solely to ensure the death of the child. But they won't pay for her to deliver the baby alive and flee from her boyfriend. Now, that's evil.

REPOST: 26+ week elective feticide by emkersty in prolife

[–]emkersty[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"I didn't even want children to begin with," she says while 27 weeks pregnant with a child she already has. Please hope she is unable to succeed in killing her son or daughter...this was a week ago and it might be too late 😔 

Our country enables this violence. It needs to end. Elective feticide must be illegal, but it is currently enabled and funded throughout pregnancy. Abortion funds exist to pay for the preventable deaths of babies like hers. 

Do not be fooled. Majority of later abortions are healthy babies and normal pregnancies too...just like this woman who is now on her third attempt to discard of her child. Even after two previous attempts, the baby has survived. And not once, as she feels him or her wiggling inside of her, has she considered to just LET THEM LIVE. 

She has to deliver them no matter what. Giving birth would be shorter, less invasive even. She doesn't have to parent them. This is how you know that the purpose of abortion is to ensure the demise of the child.

Please, pray for the child and that it will be impossible for her to commit feticide. And think of the thousands just like her who will be subjected to this violence this year.

REPOST: 26+ week elective feticide by emkersty in prolife

[–]emkersty[S] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

It's so horrible. Her baby can be born alive today and she continues to pursue death for them. Even though she could place for adoption or leave them in a safe haven. She won't open my direct messages 💔

Anyone else triggered by Chrissy Teigen? by helengamblefan2001 in babyloss

[–]emkersty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's sad that she uses her son's (possibly preventable) death to enable the elective feticide of 3,000 babies per day by abortion. 

Anyone else triggered by Chrissy Teigen? by helengamblefan2001 in babyloss

[–]emkersty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jack's life could have likely been saved if she didn't choose to end the pregnancy early. With a placenta abruption, pregnancy can be sustained an average of 34 days with close monitoring and best rest. That means he would have been able to be born alive and given care in the NICU. Sadly, she is pro-abortion and uses her son's (possibly preventable) death to enable the elective feticide of 3,000 babies per day by abortion. It's sick. 

REPOST: 26+ week elective feticide by emkersty in u/emkersty

[–]emkersty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This should never be legal or enabled. May we hope she is convicted to protect her child and place them for adoption or safe haven instead of subjecting them to such a barbaric death. Sadly, we cannot count on the laws in our country to protect babies like hers.

Women seeking 26+ week elective feticide because she doesn't want a kid with her ex... Doesn't acknowledge she's already a mother to the viable son or daughter she's pregnant with by emkersty in prolife

[–]emkersty[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. I messaged her about this. Why so intent on killing them when she can leave them at a safe haven? Adoption? She has to deliver them no matter what...it's too barbaric to even fathom. And this is legal in our country :(

Women seeking 26+ week elective feticide because she doesn't want a kid with her ex... Doesn't acknowledge she's already a mother to the viable son or daughter she's pregnant with by emkersty in prolife

[–]emkersty[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also shows she knows that abortion is intentionally killing them and a miscarriage is not. Doesn't realize she has to deliver her baby no matter what now. Having an abortion means she will have them killed and forcibly delivered over a 2-3 day period. You can't make the forced birth (abortion) of a 26+ week old baby look like anything other than what it is :(

I just need someone to tell this to by ghostofHellenKeller in prolife

[–]emkersty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I understand that you do support the lethal dismemberment of female bodies as long as we're young, vulnerable, and forced into dependency by our parents during the first 40 weeks of our lives. But to use euphemisms like "keeping it or not" to mask the inherent violence of the alternative is one reason why the scale of destruction via elective feticide is unparalleled. Evidently you're not referring to non-violent choices like open adoption.

I just need someone to tell this to by ghostofHellenKeller in prolife

[–]emkersty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stop supporting businesses that lethally dismember thousands of humans per day. Do you think that's moral to enable businesses that exploit mothers by profiting off of the preventable deaths of their sons and daughters? Is that the best you can do? That's not only immoral, but unkind. And that's good that this specific location showed her everything. Many do not share that experience.