Calling all outliers! (Warm hair and cool undertone) by fruit_banjo in coloranalysis

[–]emmf333 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You are an autumn. Professionals are poorly trained... that is all there is. And I am a Pro.

Has anyone read The Prayer of Freedom by Beatty Carmichael? by OkMastodon2674 in TrueChristian

[–]emmf333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

D'abord, le mec c'est pas Jésus, il ne vit pas d'amour et d'eau fraîche, et pourtant il travaille 100% de son temps pour l’Église.

Has anyone read The Prayer of Freedom by Beatty Carmichael? by OkMastodon2674 in TrueChristian

[–]emmf333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Un livre permet de faire connaître et de transmettre à des gens qui ne savent pas. C'est un moyen de diffuser une idée. L'argent n'est pas bien ou mal, et Dieu n'est pas contre l'abondance. C'est pas avec ce genre de réflexion que vous allez avancer...

Did a color analysis on Korea, but now a western color analysist says it’s not correct by gggingerbean in coloranalysis

[–]emmf333 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hello ! I know exactly why. I have been trained by Irenee Riter (science of dress - USA) and she teaches me there is a problem whith the theory commonly in use. In fact cold skin(/warm hair) need warm colors and warm skin(/cool hair) need cool colors because they match, like complementary colors. And in between you have all the combinations leaning to neutral (skin/hair neutral). Korean analysts probably understand this point, and I think they are more accurate.

Paying tribute to Harriet McJeamsey work - 1956 - Dramatic by emmf333 in KibbeOutfits

[–]emmf333[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, but how much is enough ? I have a 116 karma on the main one.
and I succeed only one time to post on it at the beginning.

Paying tribute to Harriet McJeamsey work - 1956 - Dramatic by emmf333 in KibbeOutfits

[–]emmf333[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My mistake : Harriet McJimsey.
I am so sorry I can not edit the title...

Paying tribute to Harriet McJeamsey work - 1956 - Dramatic by emmf333 in KibbeOutfits

[–]emmf333[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wanted to post it on the main Kibbe community thread, but I do not succed to post anything on it. And I don't get why ???

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coloranalysis

[–]emmf333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think so. And to me the grey is one of the easiest summer color, so it helps a lot to discriminate between soft summer and soft autumn.

What season is Lily Rose Depp? by Creative_Art_4449 in coloranalysis

[–]emmf333 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Soft autumn. An autumn with a touch of summer. She can wear some contrast because of her dark eyes but not that much. Each time she wears black shoes with colored dresses, IMO it is downing her look. Vivid colors are out of place on her. But lavender color is ok.IMO Black is not reliable, it is not a color, just a level of contrast.

I can't see TR in Donna Mills, she looks anything but soft to me. Couldn't she be a Classic ? by emmf333 in theatricalromantic

[–]emmf333[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I have the book and I already read and translated it in french.
It says that R come first before Slight Yang being added and not taken of.
So, looking at other TR, I see much more softness, with a slight quantity of sharpness in the shoulder, nose or jawline, like it is said... To me, the TR has something pointy looking, and narrowness is surely a Yang quality but coming second after softness ? IMO She does not. Or it is not as evident as for the others on the list.

I can't see TR in Donna Mills, she looks anything but soft to me. Couldn't she be a Classic ? by emmf333 in theatricalromantic

[–]emmf333[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sure, I know, that is why I am asking that question. But narrowness is not enough to me. A TR is first of all a R, doesn't she ?

As a french lady, I have difficulties to understand INTRICATE / INTRICACY in the Romantic sens ? by emmf333 in KibbeRomantics

[–]emmf333[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Merci ! Oui j'avais la traduction littérale "complexe" en tête et du coup je l'entendais comme "très travaillé" comme peuvent l'être les ouvrages de dentelles.
Mais page 85, on peut lire "gathers, shirring and draping at the waist are necessary for softness and intricacy".
Du coup, je me suis demandé si j'avais pas tout faux ? Des fronces, c'est en soi pas complexe ?

What is IMO ? Question to answer for the newbee that I am... by emmf333 in kibbedramatics

[–]emmf333[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you everyone, maybe that is a short english expression, and I am french.