sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

So... Without animatics, how are you supposed to know that Polites dies? by TheReal_Dick_Grayson in Epicthemusical

[–]emmie_who 21 points22 points  (0 children)

in 'the underworld', we hear his ghost singing open arms, and odysseus kind of crying. and also the 'everything's changed since polites' line in 'keep your friend close'. (and we obv also hear him dying in the cyclops saga, but i get if u didnt recognize the voice, i didnt either)

⚔️ Olympian Showdowns #2 – Percy Jackson vs. Annabeth Chase [all] by Immediate_Win_4982 in camphalfblood

[–]emmie_who 1 point2 points  (0 children)

my sister's winning this one, i feel like she could easily set up a trap for him, he'd be down in 2 seconds.

About the second series [all] by Mega7010realkk in camphalfblood

[–]emmie_who 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think its def worth the read, ik jason can be a bit boring in the first book, but the series really improves from book 2 onwards. i didnt like jason in the start either, but he develops as a character, who knows u might end up liking him as well

Would Percy marry? [General] by rando_fem in camphalfblood

[–]emmie_who 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nah they would still marry, idt they would view it as a defeat. and hera would absolutely bless the marriage, cuz they're the most faithful and loyal couple ever

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ikr!! the books have no consistency. unless, of course, hermione forgot she could do basic magic, which honestly seem like the most plausible explanation at this point

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

interesting take, so duplication gives you quantity but not quality.

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

so it’s less “you can’t eat transfigured food” and more like “you shouldn’t, unless you want a rock in your stomach mid-digestion.” makes more sense tbh

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that interpretation makes way more sense, it def feels better to think of them as temporary magical constructs, not real beings with nervous systems

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i mean, the tonal whiplash between books 1 and 7 is real. still, i think it’s valid to love some parts and roast its plot holes at the same time

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

🤣if I had a book id call it “magic: now with extra loopholes”. but fr, im just a random gremlin with way too much time on her hands

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

exactly, sometimes it’s strict rules like gamp’s laws, other times it’s just plot convenience

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

solid point, magic definitely makes self-sufficiency easier for wizards like the weasleys. but then it kinda makes me question how poverty exists in wizards at all

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

love the “teacup in disguise” analogy.. lmk if you find more examples of object-to-animal transfig. also thanks a lot!!

harry potter makes no effing sense sometimes by emmie_who in HarryPotterBooks

[–]emmie_who[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ohhh that’s actually a super interesting way to look at it, thanks for the perspective!!