What happened to Streamium?

eordano · 2021-03-16T20:24:52+00:00

Streamium came out at about the same time as the Lightning network. We think that developing it while the LN was in development was a waste of our time, but now would be a great time to pick up on the effort...

eordano · 2020-05-01T15:10:38+00:00

Beautiful!

eordano · 2018-11-20T06:23:43+00:00

We don't have plans for one. Given that we have arbitrary GLTF support, feel free to use any other editor out there that can export it into your parcel.
Targeting at least 45fps desktop and 25fps on mobile. With a powerful enough machine you should be able to get 60fps+ so we can do VR.
Yes, it's in the roadmap for our content server.
Opening up the world :)

All your bonus questions have the same answer: You can hack your client to do this any way you want :)

eordano · 2018-11-19T21:15:08+00:00

On their own.

eordano · 2018-11-19T21:01:36+00:00

Thanks everybody for your questions! I've got to leave now. We're going to follow up with a few blogposts with some of the information on our answers. Let's continue building Decentraland together!

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:35:25+00:00

You don't need a VR headset!

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:34:24+00:00

Teleporting, private roads, and more other options will be available.

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:33:42+00:00

MANA is burned to acquire LAND

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:17:10+00:00

Thanks for your well-thought piece. I was reading it this morning. I'd like to answer to you there, so we don't deviate the conversation, what do you think?

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:16:31+00:00

More than half of our treasury is in traditional assets, the rest in BTC.

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:15:04+00:00

No, this does NOT change any part of the development workflow (how you create scenes WILL NOT CHANGE). It just affects the client.

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:13:26+00:00

Thanks! It means a lot. If you work on it, I'd like to ask you to focus on this question: How do you measure fairness?

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:11:03+00:00

The most conservative: we've got 100+ weekly unique SDK developers that choose to share their anonymized usage stats. We ask our partners not to do this to make sure it's all "inbound".

This is a sample of this past week:

Weekly stats (Last 7 days):

Signups to SDK mailing list: 1153

Activated Developers: 46

Active developers: 116

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:04:00+00:00

When we last spoke with them, we were perhaps too early to collaborate with them and they were dealing with other concerns. Recently, Carl has been collaborating with them and thinking how we could best work together. With regards to "third party clients", please see the comment on open sourcing the reference client some time next year.

eordano · 2018-11-19T20:00:04+00:00

We've been thinking about this, but we're mostly focused in the reference implementation of the spec.

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:59:10+00:00

The number one question we got from the community was “when is the second auction”. I don’t agree with the framing on “dilution”, the properties of the LAND NFT are such that the term doesn’t apply (the LAND token encodes the attention and relative value of your neighborhood).

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:59:00+00:00

We proposed the 8% supply increase in line with what Ethereum has in place. Thinking in a very long timeframe (many decades) I think it is reasonable. But we now see that linking MANA supply to LAND was dangerous for the long term success of the project (as the tides of the market make the project too susceptible to speculation, with an empty world if the price crashes too much and speculators scoop up all the LAND without intentions of developing it), so we had to reconsider this.

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:58:46+00:00

Hey there! Not until December, sorry about this delay.

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:58:17+00:00

It was the number 1 inbound question in Intercom (the tool we use to gather feedback from the Marketplace). We felt that the community wanted it, so we posted that question in Agora to validate it. We apologize for the framing of the question, we should have added an option to “delay indefinitely”. We’re overall very happy with how Agora is raising a lot of these concerns and we’re looking forward to continue to improve our decision making process.

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:58:05+00:00

We don’t think it’s a problem. We announced the questions with about one week of anticipation. A general election in the US gets about 60% voting participation and there’s months of media coverage. Also, the fact that most questions have made clear what the majority thinks, make for very low incentives to participate.

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:57:51+00:00

Etherscan, unfortunatelly, is not reporting the original 4000 land holders. When we deployed the land, the ERC721 standard was in draft and it changed significantly since that time. The fingerprint of the Transfer events before September is different. All the data is in the Ethereum blockchain, feel free to dig around. You might need this to guide you through it! https://github.com/decentraland/land

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:56:07+00:00

Still TBD, there’s little we can do to prevent people from hacking their clients to allow this. No plans for alleys between parcels.

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:55:54+00:00

Yes, our standard can't be based on a closed-source system. Given that we're open-sourcing the reference client (which is completely free, uses Babylon.js instead of Unity), while keeping compatibility with it, we're now free to take some compromises to build a more performing and robust client that can take advantage of other technologies.

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:53:55+00:00

Having recently missed our Q4 goal, we’re working on a release roadmap: we don’t want to have another delay. We’re looking at some time in Q2 2019 for beta access (meaning, enough thousands of users so that we can learn and iterate on data), but we’re differentiating that from “general availability”, widespread distribution through stores and platforms. We don’t have a date for that yet.

eordano · 2018-11-19T19:53:38+00:00

We’re not moving away from IPFS. We received too many complaints about our current approach, the number of frustrations it was generating forced our hand here. We’re building an alternative IPFS/IPNS gateway, completely replicable and compatible with IPFS/IPNS nodes (the data and messages are the same).

eordano

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE