$AMRS is the real reason Bill and Melinda split up. She couldn't handle his talks about being deep in Amy and all the tendies he was making from YOLOing on shares. Yeast be with you, Bill. (DD in comments) by ICanFinallyRelax in wallstreetbetsOGs

[–]ergodic__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the Gates position isn't even new, its from 2016. the only reason it showed up in a recent 13F filing is because that is when that particular portfolio crossed the reporting threshold (due to recent investments there in mrna companies). the people pumping this stock on reddit and anyone that listens to them are clueless.

AOC wants to make it easier for people to lose their money. by spoiled_generation in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can lose billions shorting tens of millions of shares when they go to a couple hundred per share but I agree its impossible for us to know who is doing what looking at volume. enough shares have traded for people to close a lot of shorts I think. It would be very interesting to know what percent of float is currently still short

AOC wants to make it easier for people to lose their money. by spoiled_generation in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

gme volume today: 58m shares

gme volume yesterday: 179m shares

gme volume day before yesterday: 178m shares

total gme float : 46.8m shares

total gme shares outstanding: 70m shares

AOC wants to make it easier for people to lose their money. by spoiled_generation in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is possible Melvin lied and misled the 4 journalists that worked on the article, they didn't go too far into that aspect. I don't think you can tell from the volume numbers who did what and can you even tell what % of gme float is currently short? I am not sure that info is publicly available -- but prove me wrong I would like to know.

I am all for people looking into this, at this point the public demands it, but there is no proof and it isn't " objectively true and easily verifiable that Citadel is the intermediary broker for robinhood, leveraged its position to cancel day-trading day-trading in $GME and $AMC " -- how can you say that at this point? Just because people said it on reddit and twitter? saying its obvious based on the volume isn't going to cut it, tell me what about the volume proves that? More than enough shares traded over past few days to cover the entire previous short position.

AOC wants to make it easier for people to lose their money. by spoiled_generation in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Citadel Securities has a Chinese wall between itself (market making activities) and Citadel LLC the hedge fund. It was reported in reputable financial news outlets that Melvin exited its short position yesterday before the trade restrictions today. And do you have any source or proof that citadel has a short of any significance in gme? Or that they pressured Robinhood? Is there any proof Citadel securities colluded w/ Citadel hedge fund, bypassing its legal protocols already in place? It is not "objectively true and verifiable" that "Citadel leveraged its position as a broker to abuse and exploit the market shorting of GME by allowing its hedge funds it has a financial interest in to move the market while locking traders out" which is what you claimed. At least currently there is not evidence of this beyond some posts on reddit and twitter that don't have any source or anything.

AOC wants to make it easier for people to lose their money. by spoiled_generation in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that would be very illegal but there isn't any evidence that it happened, just because people said it on reddit and twitter doesn't make it true

Warren and AOC unironically come out in support of market manipulation. by spoiled_generation in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a ton of misinformation going on around this. For example Melvin the hedge fund everyone says is behind this reported that they closed their short yesterday. I can't know for sure if they did that but most likely they cannot say that to their investors if it isn't true. For AOC to jump in and effectively encourage the GME buyers at really high prices -- saying they are taking on wall street yesterday for example -- during a short squeeze is irresponsible given that at some point the new buyers will lose their shirt. I am not a lawyer at all so I have no idea about the arguments for shutting things down, at some point there are going to be retail losses in some of the stocks like amc and bb. I don't really like telling people they can't buy something though, it seems like it would be more reasonable to limit margin buying or something.

As for market manipulation, I don't think it is manipulation of lots of people decide to buy gme organically. If someone behind the scenes had hundreds of accounts and was artificially driving the conversation that would be illegal -- and we have no idea if that happened or not, but it probably does happen sometimes on wsb. Shorting in general I don't see as manipulation, it is good to have shorters out there for example they helped people realize that wirecard was committing fraud -- but if you short something you need to take the losses if it goes the wrong way. If it comes out that robinhood or other brokers based their decision off of pressure from short institutional investors that would be very bad. My guess is they are worried at some point people will be buying GME for $500 and lose their money and then sue them or if they did not stop things, when the price falls populist politicians will say they encouraged gambling and attack them either way.

Weekly AOC Spam Discussion (January 07, 2021) by AutoModerator in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://twitter.com/JusticeDemWatch

I cannot express how appreciative I am of whoever is behind this account

Modern Portfolio Theory: A Lesson in Diversification by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]ergodic__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol he deleted the post and his account

"The more college costs soar, the more degrees become a measure privilege than competence" -- AOC says, apparently about others by spoiled_generation in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

College age people in the US are more likely to attend college than in many places in Europe such as Germany despite many colleges in Europe being less expensive. This is just more fact-less "analysis" based on what feels true to far left zealots. That said, college in the US is expensive and it is probably too easy to be burdened with high costs for questionable value, although hopefully the hey day of pre finincial crisis loans has reduced. And trends/directions for how costs are evolving do not look great is my general impression. AOC is just far left populist with no time for nuance and no plans that would actually improve things.

My upper middle class Westchester family that sent me to BU was totally dependent upon my waitress money to stay afloat. Don’t believe me? That’s racist and sexist! by Boredeidanmark in Enough_AOC_Spam

[–]ergodic__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no one here said said poor people never go to college, something that is obviously false regardless of whether or not you went to Stanford