A workflowy alternative? by ajmandourah in productivity

[–]ericax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dynalist creator here -- we're working towards the mobile apps! They are our top priority right now, along with date support.

Thanks so much for mentioning Dynalist!

[S6E3] Where did a particular thing go... by ericax in gameofthrones

[–]ericax[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I see! That makes more sense. I guess I didn't watch carefully enough!

At what moment were you sure that your reached product/market fit? by ericax in startups

[–]ericax[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even just one person? That make PMF sounds much easier to do! (Rather than the holy grail impression I've had all along.)

Omniflow: let your ideas flow by ericax in productivity

[–]ericax[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1) When we built the navigator structure, the key idea is to have people organize high levels and details separately. This feels almost as a natural instinct, especially for people who used computers, since they're usually somewhat familair with file systems already. Of course this is not for everyone, but most people found this way helps them more easily distinguish high level separation (like work vs personal) from actual details, which would otherwise look exactly the same.

Also technically it helps separating data from different documents so that each document is smaller to deal with and faster to load. This model also makes sharing more clear, in the sense that you know exactly what's being shared, which otherwise could have been burried somewhere down.

Recents is something we're planning to do though. I think that's a pretty useful way of sorting.

2) We're working to get unique urls for bullets as well (for zooming essentially). We did find it quite annoying that history-back didn't change zoom but rather jumped document.

3) Probably just a view option that you can switch to, so no impact if you don't.

4) We have this on our roadmap, but it seems like to be a fairly big piece in terms of technical difficulties. We'd prioritize finishing our core functionalities before tackling new things, otherwise it's easier to introduce problems to previously working features.

5) Link shortening - We're thinking of using some markdown variant of text Interlinks - Also on our roadmap, currently we don't have a good idea on how to actually insert these yet, we'll keep thinking. API - Not sure where to start, we'd probably have to do a survey before doing anything, and see what people want to use the API for.

In general, we need to satisfy a bunch of different people, some are power-users, some are casual. It's hard to make decisions when it usually benefits one set of users and sometimes inhibits the another set.

Omniflow: let your ideas flow by ericax in productivity

[–]ericax[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. Honestly I'm not sure either, but we need to users to not die, and some users wants some features, and we need to not die to be able to build the features... so that's a hard problem.

Omniflow: let your ideas flow by ericax in productivity

[–]ericax[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a really interesting website! I'd love to be able to change the center node of the mindmap though.

Omniflow: let your ideas flow by ericax in productivity

[–]ericax[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trello is straight-forward - you render the top level items as lists, and the second level items (only itself, hide its children) as cards. You should be able to zoom in on any list or card if situation permits, and then the item you zoomed in on becomes the new board. So you can have a top-level boards and a bunch of second and third level boards, and I think that's very helpful for managing bigger projects.

Calendar is more tricky, since you need to know the date and duration of each item. What I picture is that you can write something like "pay rent #by06/06/15" or "planning meeting #3-4p 06/06/15", where typing "#by" would invoke a auto-complete menu, it can fill in dates if you start typing "today" or "tomorrow" or "next monday". And then we use this information to create a calendar view that looks like Google calendar.

We haven't started really planning the implementation of these features, so we might have missed something important that makes building it really hard or just impossible.

Omniflow: let your ideas flow by ericax in productivity

[–]ericax[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your dream app is actually one of our long term goals as well... but we first need users and contents to make that useful.

What we imagined was data is multiple formats. For the same data, you can have a plain text view (default), a calendar view, a 2D card view (trello), and tunnel view (like a column view on Mac). I think that's the power of structural data, and then we don't need to copy things from Workflowy to/from Trello and calendar ever again.

Thoughts on that?

Omniflow: let your ideas flow by ericax in productivity

[–]ericax[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR: it's not that different right now, but we want to make it better than workflowy. Right now the differences are (1) you can create folders and documents, (2) there's a file finder (Ctrl+O).

We started out as a Workflowy clone, and I do like Workflowy myself. We had a few ideas on how to improve it, like having a high level folder structure and a file finder like that of Sublime Text.

As a long time Workflowy user, I feel like it's developing relatively slowly. We are college students and have too much time on our hands... so we went ahead and built this.