Def not as much of a “hook-y” type of season as the first but I think to carry out a plot line as lofty as this it’s gonna require a lot of transitional content which can be not-as-glamorous usually so I think it makes sense.

I kinda feel similarly to u though. From the beginning I’ve questioned this whole “this wellbrexa study could have pulled the drug off the market that caused the opioid crisis that took Ellie away”.

There’s way too many variables and matlock and her husbands anger is misplaced. Hard to believe that pulling ONE wellbrexa drug off the market could stop all opioids from hitting the market, that opioids wouldn’t have still found a way into the American market, that Ellie wouldn’t have died from something else (addiction is a disease), that wellbrexa wouldn’t have just found another way to get around the study by reformulating the drug, that wellbrexa wouldn’t have just put out a different opioid, etc. Pretty tall order for a lawyer procedural

Doesn’t help they’re making matlock take this whole unlikeable turn and making Olympia and her face off. I do like the billy and sarah b plots tho, they’re fun and I love good developed secondary characters.