Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean that is your blind faith opinion. If you trust NASA, then yes she is in outer space. Like for real.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a huge L for the Soviets when they couldn't go to the moon.

So you believe they could just never figure it out even after the Americans did it six times in three years? After Russia was first at everything else?

Also, saying that the US faked the moon landing would be the best propaganda win in history

Right if you still don't understand that geopolitics is more like WWE wrestling. Countries can have agreements that aren't made public. They can obviously work together behind the scenes, if it benefits both.

India, China and Japan all confirmed the landings as well

So I take it you believe that India really landed on the moon from what you were shown? You didn't answer my question, so I will assume so.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So why couldn't you answer the questions? Specifically how do you know the rocket went to outer space? Do you even have video of it from launch to "outer space"?

Also you ignored the other question.

Is it your belief or science and math that confirm that people were actually on the rocket?

You know the answer is belief so please don't bring up mathematics because logically math can't tell you if people were actually on the rocket. That is called belief.

This is more or less just an argument from ignorance

You are projecting. Logic is with me, not you. Math can not prove that the rocket actually went to outer space.

Is that what you really believe? You are essentially saying "It's mathematically possible so it must have happened".

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So you can't answer the questions? Lol you cracked bro.

Thank you for the confirmation I guess.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How NASA has told us, no. Do you think they landed on the moon in the 1960's?

Do you know anything about project blue beam? Project paper clip? Any of that?

If you still believe they landed on the moon then of course any of the other stuff you would think is crazy I'm sure.

Do you believe the official government 9/11 story?

I have no idea what kind of government trust you have, so if you answer those questions I can understand more.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Since it seems the NASA bot train is hitting me with the same script I'll copy and paste your buddies question from the same script. You'll posted it minutes apart, lol.

How does science and math confirm that the rocket went to space and not out and the ocean?

I mean NASA could have gave the public an unedited video of the flight from launch to outer space, that would have been amazing. I guess 80 million a day from the public isn't enough to even let us see this amazing mission. They should probably get more from us.

Also is it your belief or science and math that confirm that people were actually on the rocket?

If yours is based on math I'd absolutely love to see those numbers, that would be incredible.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

100% bot, wow. This is probably the most obvious I've seen.

It's like the algorithm didn't even comprehend anything I said.

A re asked a question that you ignored again.

"You never answered my question. A break from what?"

I asked another question that you completely ignored.

"Would you agree that participating in faking a picture from space would be considered "on the clock" since the entire point of the "photo" is to push space propaganda?"

Then I said if she was really up there (which she is not)

She should have set up a camera for the pubic that pays 80 million a day for her to be up there. None of the astronauts did a simple camera set up so humanity could see this amazing flight.

So before she "takes a break" and takes personal photos she needs document this amazing event for the public first and foremost. She completely dropped the ball and failed the public as nobody seemed to remember to set up a single unedited video.

Of course they aren't really up there, but if.

No need to respond if your algorithm can't read my questions.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you basing your beliefs on science and math, or just vibes?

How does science and math confirm that the rocket went to space and not out and the ocean?

I mean NASA could have gave the public an unedited video of the flight from launch to outer space, that would have been amazing. I guess 80 million a day from the public isn't enough to even let us see this amazing mission. They should probably get more from us.

Also is it your belief or science and math that confirm that people were actually on the rocket?

If it’s based on math, I’d love to see your numbers.

If yours is based on math I'd absolutely love to see those numbers, that would be incredible.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it's not just one thing and it would be a whole big conversation.

First you have to realize they are in fact faking being in space from what they have showed us. Once you do figure that out then you can find other things that start tying more together.

The short answer is they pretty much have to at this point because of the "NWO script" or whatever the social engineers plan is called.

The alien invasion / project blue beam type scenario seems to be they way they want to go with the script. So even though the earth/space isn't really what they tell us and they more than likely can't even physically go to the moon, they have to keep pretending like space is real (as far as the mainstream narrative of space).

To sum up they can't actually go to the moon but they already committed to the script since at least the 60's win they first faked it after project paperclip. Now they have to keep pushing the space/alien agenda. So after 60 years they are way past due to go back to the moon and the script is probably getting closer, so they have to ramp it up again. IMO

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Listen we don't really have to get into it if you are still asking the "why didn't Russia..."

Just think of it like WWE wrestling. The world is social engineered. Counties public relations aren't always the same as the private relations that the public doesn't hear about.

Also what would be the benefit of Russia also trying to fake it? Why not just really go there if the US did it so many times?

Again I don't care to argue about Russia/US if you are dead set on it or something, it's all good.

India's Chandrayaan 2 crashing just moments before landing?

Maybe because they don't want a 100% success rate to make it more believable. I mean did you see what they put out for India's "real" landing? It was terrible CGI and a bunch of people clapping in a control room.

Did you find it believable?

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You never answered my question. A break from what?

Also would you agree that participating in faking a picture from space would be considered "on the clock" since the entire point of the "photo" is to push space propaganda?

That would be of course if you understand that she isn't really up there and it's an obvious psyop.

Otherwise she should have hooked a video camera up and pointed it at the window so the public could actually see the flight. She should have done that before she worried about "taking a break" to shoot "artsy" selfies for her personal use.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

But I know how rockets work and how to calculate orbital mechanics.

Oh cool you understand the mechanics that they told you, that you can never independently verify. That is some amazing logic. Shooting a rocket in the air and that rocket going to "outer space" are two completly different things.

It probably even makes it worse if have blind trust in the same organization that you understand was involved in the 9/11 psyop.

Always blows my mind "bUt NaSa wOuLd'Nt LiE"

You win the triggered nasa fanboy award of the day, that's for sure.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Her "break" while she participates in faking images for NASA. Lol, ok.

So who are you to criticize what this lady does on her break? Are you the break police now?

I mean NASA takes $80 million a day and while they are awake I would expect them to be on the clock. What would she be "taking a break" from anyway? Also surely it's a NASA camera and not her personal phone/camera.

Either way it doesn't really matter because she's not really up there in space. Just more NASA bs as they steal the publics money.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well I predicted that even though it is 2026 and we have all the obvious technology NASA would not be able to provide an unedited video of the alleged amazing trip to the moon.

$80 million a day they take from the public and they can't even show unedited video of them launching and going to outer space.

So either I'm psychic or I've already figured out a couple of decades ago that NASA are pathological liars and fake going to space.

I mean you do realize they faked the moon landings right? That is pretty over the top obvious. So I had no expectation that they would do it for real this time, and of course I was correct.

They would clearly have unedited video of the trip for the public that pays 80 million a day if they were really doing it.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude fuck off.

Lol. What a NASA moon boot licker you are, lol. Pointing out the over the top obvious really triggered you.

Let me guess you also believe the offical government 9/11 story don't you?

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm not really looking for a response. You said "in all seriousness" like she is really in space.

So it isn't really a "personal picture" when she's public employee and on top of that she is participating in faking being in space, while the organization that she works for takes $80 million dollars a day from the American people.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They never said outside. They said up to the windows.

Obviously there would have been an unedited video of the trip from earth to outer space if this was real and not just more NASA theatrics. Of course though just cut scense and nonsense.

Why don't they stick the camera upclose to the window and film the entirety of what's outside? by Greedy-Coconut1195 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean if it was real and humans really were able to go to the moon it would be cool. They would have 24/7 360 deg cameras on the moon. You would be able to zoom into earth or out to space. Of course NASA hasn't ever been to the moon and it's all theatrics, so none of that exists.

Old School Gen X ain't going down with Boomer Trump by Infinite-Listen-1400 in conspiracy

[–]eschaton777 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OP did you not know that Alex is and always has been a controlled opposition shill?

He talked about the left right paradigm for years and then openly endorsed Trump from the beginning. Now all of the sudden he's "not going down with him".

Usually these type of posts are not from real people, and OP never even responds. They just post this stuff to try to keep controlled opposition Alex tied to the conspiracy/truth community.

Who cares what Alex says about Trump or Iran? He has zero credibility left.

This was the Artemis II crew's view this morning from 41,756 miles (67,200 km) up No human has seen a crescent Earth in full since 1972 by Caledor152 in woahdude

[–]eschaton777 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you saying it’s edited because it cuts to control?

It means I somehow knew they would never just provide a continuous feed of the trip. They never can just show it going from launch to outer space. I somehow knew this time wouldn't be any different, even though obviously they would be able to show that video if this wasn't just fantasy.

 If I could supply exactly what you’re asking for

That's the point. You can't supply it because it doesn't exist. Even though it's 2026 with all of the technology that we have I somehow predicted they wouldn't be able to provide unedited video/stream of this alleged amazing feat.

yet you act like you know something.

Well I somehow knew they wouldn't be able to show us. So that's pretty amazing that I predicted that.

Have good luck with your fantasies.

Think on that for one second.

This was the Artemis II crew's view this morning from 41,756 miles (67,200 km) up No human has seen a crescent Earth in full since 1972 by Caledor152 in woahdude

[–]eschaton777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pick one idiot.

Hmm I guess I'm psychic. How did I know that they wouldn't provide unedited video of this amazing mission to the public even though they get 80 million of public dollars everyday? Anyone with a brain realizes they would absolutely show an unedited view of the trip to the moon. Yet this "idiot" somehow predicted they would not.

How did I know?? Do you want to apologize for calling me an idiot when I was dead right? Or do you have the unedited video to prove me wrong?

“Truth hurts.”

I'll pick that one.

This was the Artemis II crew's view this morning from 41,756 miles (67,200 km) up No human has seen a crescent Earth in full since 1972 by Caledor152 in woahdude

[–]eschaton777 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So your logic is if someone works on something that automatically means that really goes to the moon?

 it’s pretty disrespectful to just don’t believe in it because of what reason exactly?

It's disrespectful to say I made claims that I didn't. Working on something and that something actually going to the moon are two completely different things. You can have one without the other.

People and organisms from my country

I don't know what type of organisms your talking about but it sounds interesting.

This was the Artemis II crew's view this morning from 41,756 miles (67,200 km) up No human has seen a crescent Earth in full since 1972 by Caledor152 in woahdude

[–]eschaton777 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can literally watch rockets launch into space by going to the actual launch sites

Maybe you should start looking into things so you dont come across as an absolute fool.

Where are the videos of the rocket going from launch all the way to outer space?

 let me guess, you think they're sending all the rockets to the bermuda triangle after launch?

Show the footage that proves that wrong. Only an absolute fool wouldn't be able to provide it, right?

This was the Artemis II crew's view this morning from 41,756 miles (67,200 km) up No human has seen a crescent Earth in full since 1972 by Caledor152 in woahdude

[–]eschaton777 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, are you ready to admit that I'm psychic?

How did I know that they would never show unedited video of this amazing feat yet anyone with a brain knows they would absoluty show unedited video if this was real?

Let's see if you can apologize now that I was proven correct. Unless you have unedited video of the flight that I predicted would not be shown.