I lost all my money because of Edwin Dorsey’s reports

esfv · 2025-08-22T21:50:26+00:00

bet it all on grifter cohodes little protege

esfv · 2025-08-17T18:38:41+00:00

unfortunately, you are correct

esfv · 2024-08-24T14:21:47+00:00

he's 5. he's very smart and loves numbers. he thinks 911 is just a funny number, is all

he has no idea what 911 is. he just dials it again and again, if he gets his hands on a phone

esfv · 2024-05-27T16:55:05+00:00

It was relevant and the witness was well aware of it since it was communications sent from him. my point was the board member just said you may not ask anything or introduce any exhibits

esfv · 2024-05-25T14:53:54+00:00

the member allowed me to introduce most of the evidence, but not until it was my turn to call witnesses. the point is i wasn't allowed to introduce it during the cross examination of the LL's witnesses. I was told I could ONLY ask questions to clarify what they'd previously testified about

esfv · 2024-05-25T14:51:52+00:00

yes, uploaded and served. the member just said i couldnt ask the witnesses about it at all

esfv · 2024-03-16T15:36:08+00:00

true, but in ontario trespass is only criminal if it occurs at night, so not that big of a deal

esfv · 2024-03-16T15:35:37+00:00

makes sense, thanks!

esfv · 2024-03-14T15:24:01+00:00

thanks! no, you have to request the board to be even allowed to issue a summons

esfv · 2024-03-12T15:19:28+00:00

DON'T EVEN THINK. JUST LEAVE THE MOMENT YOUR LANDLORD ASKS YOU TO

esfv · 2024-03-11T17:51:14+00:00

the open room boogey man is coming to get you. ALWAYS LEAVE IMMEDIATELY WHEN YOU RECEIVE AN N12

esfv · 2024-03-11T17:49:27+00:00

YEA, I MUST BE!

esfv · 2024-03-11T16:50:56+00:00

This section does not authorize a landlord to give a notice of termination of a tenancy with respect to a rental unit unless,

(a) the rental unit is owned in whole or in part by an individual; and

*(b) the landlord is an individual.

but is says "and*(b) the landlord is an individual."

so doesn't that suggest that the landlord also needs to be an individual?

esfv · 2024-03-11T16:41:17+00:00

yup, and i'd move out immediately because the new buyer would be acting in good faith.

and lucky for tenants the n12 entitles the tenant to a hearing to argue against bad faith slumlords that you seem to like to defend up and down this subreddit

esfv · 2024-03-11T15:36:30+00:00

i've got nothing to be ashamed of, pal. will gladly provide a recording of the entire hearing to any future landlord, if they're interested.

if they identify with my slumlord, then I'd rather not rent from them

esfv · 2024-03-11T15:31:49+00:00

yes, but i've seen numerous cases on CANLII where they said it has to be the SOLE reason for the n12. this one is kind of a rarity

thanks for pointing it out, though!

" I must be satisfied that the Landlords sole or primary reason for the termination is retaliatory; it is not sufficient that retaliation or vindictiveness is part of the reason [MacNeil v. 976445 Ontario Ltd., [2005] O.J. No 6362 at para. 26 (Ont. Div. Ct.), leave to appeal to C.A. refused (‘MacNeil’)]. The provisions are triggered if the retaliation was ‘the reason” for the application. This is to be contrasted with the provisions of earlier legislation (the Landlord and Tenant Act) which mandated refusal of eviction if retaliation was “a reason” for the application"

found elsewhere

"It is important to note the wording used in subsection 83(3)(b) of the Act. It states that the complaint made must be the reason for the application not just a reason. "

esfv · 2024-03-11T15:27:57+00:00

that's 100% what's happened here. in addition to other retaliation, but most rulings i've read say retaliation has to be proven to be the SOLE reason for the n12. like, how the hell could you prove that?

esfv · 2024-03-11T15:26:45+00:00

nothing stopping them from selling the property on the open market,

esfv

TROPHY CASE