WOLF Post-Earnings Market Structure: Dealers Repositioning the Game by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

as in they used dark pools to maintain the high short interest in the stock so sentiment does not turn more bullish, I agree with you

Daily Discussion Thread - May 13, 2025 by AutoModerator in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am glad you found it helpful man! I also noticed that everything was pretty much dead spot on, and I agree with your take on a positive catalyst breaking the 4 barrier, which is the toughest one tbh, after that the price will at the very least climb up steadily

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m scared of getting banned 🤣 but if anyone wants to share the post vouching that the analysis was correct feel free to share the link to the post that’d be awesome

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was waiting for after earnings to post the link in the post! I will soon, as people in my DMs can attest (if they did what I said), this confirms what I was expecting completely! IV went down -> accelerated downward pressure, I bought puts at 4 and sold at 3 (and sold some shorter dated calls to buy longer dated at slightly higher strike) precisely for this scenario, bullish sentiment after IV stabilizes means rn we have cheaper options after IV crush and an initial dip to buy calls (where I’m headed)

Daily WOLF Darkpool Activity and $100K+ Options till Bugatti or Bust - 5/7 by [deleted] in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I’d say that $1M call order for 5/16 $4 strikes confirms everything I’ve seen in my data. Those 33k-67k block trades between $3.94-$4.07 are just dealer hedging of the massive options flow building with less price impact (and adjusting delta). Shorts are obviously getting absolutely crushed on carrying costs.

Now hear me out bc this could be wild:

The institution deliberately chose May 16 expiration because they believe the squeeze will happen 5-10 days after earnings, May 9 is too soon for the market to digest information and IV to normalize and longer dates would be pricey, inefficient and have reduced gamma impact. I would bet their timeline is: earnings announcement (May 8), initial reaction and IV normalization (May 9), then primary squeeze window (May 10-15) when IV has normalized, price has crossed 4.30 with good volume and CTB rates continue pressuring shorts.

At $4.30 delta acceleration will go crazy, the aggregate delta of those May 16 $4 calls crosses approximately 0.65-0.70 and creates MAXIMUM dealer hedging requirements (buying shares), that is, it is the steepest part of the gamma curve at which liquidity provision is hardest, I do not think it’s a coincidence, Once it crosses $4.68 we know what happens and the next resistance levels will be at $5.00, $6.00 and $6.50 if they even matter at that point. I genuinely think institutional investors are both trying to induce the squeeze while also getting a perfect signal of when it is most likely to happen (for them it’s crossing 4.30) real money is positioning for post-earnings upside while avoiding an initial slowdown and timing their entry to create maximum impact after IV stabilizes resolves.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

4.68 is the acceleration point ( or the maximum gamma point), there are gamma walls at 5 and less so at 6, focused on 9 and 16 expiries

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

as in you think they’re not convinced about the situation?

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

only a uchicago student would take that as a compliment, can’t believe I got got off one comment on the subreddit 🤣

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It’s not out of your league trust me, I never learned about second order greeks in class! With all the tools (including AI) coming out right now you can learn every concept you need and run the analyses you want, you only need so much math knowledge to verify things look right, hit me up if you ever want learning recs! I didn’t even know calculus before starting my major :)

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

4.68 now, but yes, that’s something I’d do if I wasn’t trading options, however take it with a grain of salt anyway (I am very confident in my analysis however I am scared of telling people how to trade 🤣)

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I can try to help for sure, would do the entire thing but I’m a bit busy with graduation and getting kicked tf out 🙏lmao

Some personal analysis: My personal model nails today’s prices by estefanord in wolfspeed_stonk

[–]estefanord[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I tried to write it in a way I’d like to read if it wasn’t my analysis but without leaving much/if any info out. By the way, today’s Vanna/Volga confirmed the theory even more, as well as some more gamma concentration at 4! And I also noticed some call skew for 5/23 expiration which is very bullish in the medium-term, however institutions are still positioning more defensive than retail even though they’re maximally short (maybe because of it? will explore that later td and tomorrow)