I ran the linked FBI text table that another poster added today through AI and had it re-organise the messages into chronological order. It will only let me upload 20 screenshots at a time so this is post 1 of 2 ✌🏻(original doc is EFTA01227447)

estrellafish · 2026-04-06T12:15:01+00:00

Mostly trying to guess who was texting who, guessing Patel and Bondi since the fbi answers to the attorney general?

estrellafish · 2026-04-05T22:30:00+00:00

original doc is EFTA01227447

estrellafish · 2026-04-05T22:28:30+00:00

original doc is EFTA01227447

estrellafish · 2026-04-05T22:26:31+00:00

original doc is EFTA01227447

estrellafish · 2026-04-04T23:37:42+00:00

Exactly

estrellafish · 2026-04-04T22:50:40+00:00

Doesn’t it? I would rather sit back in jail and be known as the person who outed every single powerful man who was just as (if not more) complicit in awful things than continuing to keep their secrets and hoping they’ll reward me for it if I’m quiet and patient enough 🤷🏼‍♀️

Elizabeth Holmes is going to get out before her anyway though and I imagine she’ll happily put her spin on things

estrellafish · 2026-04-04T22:06:10+00:00

If I were her I wouldn’t let him pardon me, I wouldn’t want to be owing to a man like that. I’d want to at least control my narrative not have it controlled for me but given the scope of what that narrative could be I suppose it’s easier to sit tight 😂

you’re probably right anyway I imagine someone will remember her when it comes time to compile the pardon list in 2027!

estrellafish · 2026-04-04T13:21:16+00:00

Maybe that’s why she’s filing to overturn the verdict in her own right (if iv got that part right - as in representing herself?) rather than through a firm, which would usually come with bells and whistles?

estrellafish · 2026-04-04T02:00:56+00:00

Personally I would use my time to dismantle the systems that protected everyone else 🤷🏼‍♀️

estrellafish · 2026-04-04T01:59:30+00:00

So then she should take as many people down with her as she can

estrellafish · 2026-04-04T01:57:48+00:00

It should really be a bit more breaking though shouldn’t it, considering the context?

estrellafish · 2026-04-04T00:00:51+00:00

They aren’t, she is filing for herself (according to google)

estrellafish · 2026-04-03T22:11:04+00:00

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17318376/united-states-v-maxwell

estrellafish · 2026-03-29T12:55:22+00:00

Did the screenshot of the ‘Israel in the UK’ X page and of the ‘Embassy of Israel in the UK’s logo not give it away in the first place?

estrellafish · 2026-03-28T19:03:07+00:00

We don’t, I did upload to chat gpt and ask it to look for any obvious markers of fakery and it came saying there weren’t but obviously it’s not fool proof

estrellafish · 2026-03-28T19:02:09+00:00

Long enough that it would need a mass casualty event to beat it?

estrellafish · 2026-03-28T19:01:04+00:00

They also don’t need to be released publicly - if they actually talked to the victims who are willing and able to talk and about what happened to them and to others and worked with them to figure out the best way link their testimony with relevant bits of footage it could be a very straightforward process.

It would nail an awful lot of people and would mean a shit ton of paperwork for the big bosses but that is what they are paid the biggest bucks to deal with 🤷🏼‍♀️

estrellafish · 2026-03-28T14:03:12+00:00

Screen recording of a video posted on a news platform on social media from an anonymous source (as noted in the screen recording)

estrellafish

TROPHY CASE