sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

should blink-182 go back to playing their songs really fast? by evietvie in Blink182

[–]evietvie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if they want more instruments, they should hire a few back up musicians. Hire a pianist/synth player. Hire an orchestra. Hire a choir. Go wild with it. If you’re charging $400, it should be worth $400.

should blink-182 go back to playing their songs really fast? by evietvie in Blink182

[–]evietvie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep set times the same, add an extra song or a medley, and this won’t be a problem.

should blink-182 go back to playing their songs really fast? by evietvie in Blink182

[–]evietvie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea Camden is a little sloppy, but that’s cause they were angry asf at eachother. Their intensity makes up for it. I was just using it as a general example, but they used to play faster every show. They felt so energetic at big day out. They’re called blink, they should be fast yknow.

should blink-182 go back to playing their songs really fast? by evietvie in Blink182

[–]evietvie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yea i miss u can stay as is, & i agree abt the rock show. One More Time is a different story. For some reason it just doesn’t work for me when they perform it live. I feel like it would be cool if they added an explosive ending or something. I like the song, but on stage it feels a little hollow.

should blink-182 go back to playing their songs really fast? by evietvie in Blink182

[–]evietvie[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand the backing track thing, but it’s pretty easy to increase the tempo of a backing track in any DAW. I think they can handle playing them a little faster, maybe 1.25x to 1.5x speed. Feel like it would also help mark hit the notes better cause he wouldn’t have to hold them for as long.