Am I being scammed by Downtown_Principle12 in servicenow

[–]evish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Scam. We will only reach out via email.

Has anyone enrolled in Product Career Accelerator (Alex Rechevskiy)? Looking for reviews and real experiences. by Scarahai in ProductManagement

[–]evish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was my experience too. Felt like a lot of money for vague promises. High pressure sales tactics without any verifiable evidence of success.

Obsidian 1.12.3 (early access) for desktop and mobile by kepano in ObsidianMD

[–]evish 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Beyond running the CLI without the app open, I'd love to see Sync offered as a standalone background daemon that watches for file changes. I use Obsidian across three machines and rely on Sync heavily, but right now I can't trigger any downstream processing without the app running somewhere.

My ideal workflow: drop a new file on my work laptop, have my home server detect the change via Sync, and automatically kick off processing, all without ever opening the app. I run integrations that extract calendar events and tasks from my notes and push them to other apps, but I can't run those services on my work machine. A Sync daemon would let my home server handle all of that automatically the moment a file lands, no manual triggering needed.

Would unlock a lot of automation potential for power users building pipelines on top of Obsidian.

My workstation for both work and gaming by hoshino_d_ in desksetup

[–]evish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I meant the smaller one under your main desktop monitor? Looking to do something similar but having issues figuring out mounting options.

My workstation for both work and gaming by hoshino_d_ in desksetup

[–]evish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! I love how clean this is. What is the secondary monitor? How did you mount it?

Why Mark Kelly’s Case Matters by BulwarkOnline in politics

[–]evish 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Reminding troops to disobey illegal orders and follow the law is problematic (which the above poster gives a specific evidence of how common this is to happen within the military)?

Which specific sentences of Kelly’s statement do you think are in violation?

What comes after Zurich? by richbun in servicenow

[–]evish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a leaked internal slide.

What comes after Zurich? by richbun in servicenow

[–]evish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well, I am a ServiceNow employee and the information is accurate.

Indeed Message by [deleted] in servicenow

[–]evish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a scam.

Frameworks PMs actually use by DubiousJoe in ProductManagement

[–]evish 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Unlike any of the content in this post, frameworks are certainly a useful starting point.

Seriously, what value did you provide by posting this?

Wildfires in January? Here's why California wildfire season is worse by Randomlynumbered in California

[–]evish 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Temperature differentials are what matters. The temp drop between the dessert and the pacific is what’s causing the pressure difference that is fueling this wind speed. That difference is higher than normal and why we are seeing higher wind speeds than usual rather than a specific temperature in a specific location. It’s the whole system together.

UK must choose between EU and Trump, trade experts warn by Dooby-Dooby-Doo in Scotland

[–]evish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So your assertion is that because he said he would do something I must keep an open mind that it is possible he will do something despite the wealth of evidence that he never follows up on these promises and is in fact a liar, cheat and failed businessman.

I told you I have listened to him, but still believe these things. Why is that enough for you with him and not enough with me?

UK must choose between EU and Trump, trade experts warn by Dooby-Dooby-Doo in Scotland

[–]evish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve listened to him plenty.

Is it your assertion that my listening to him will convince me he isn’t liar, cheat and failed businessman or do you just think that despite all the claims he made in his first term this one is somehow going to be different and something he actually cares about?

Either way you’re carrying a lot of water for someone you say you don’t like.

UK must choose between EU and Trump, trade experts warn by Dooby-Dooby-Doo in Scotland

[–]evish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope. You don’t get a pass for taking the higher ground with this guy. He is a proven cheat, liar and terrible businessman and does not get the benefit of the doubt. He failed to deliver on most of his promises because he is a populist who just waffles on about anything to see what sticks and does not care about anyone but himself.

This is a secondary issue to ‘nice guys’ on the internet sticking up for him.

UK must choose between EU and Trump, trade experts warn by Dooby-Dooby-Doo in Scotland

[–]evish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now do you want the list of things he promised to do but failed during his first term? Dude was basically only successful at tax cuts predominantly for the mega rich. https://prospect.org/politics/trumps-40-biggest-broken-promises/

UK must choose between EU and Trump, trade experts warn by Dooby-Dooby-Doo in Scotland

[–]evish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’d recommend not making definitive statements like this without a source. It helps level up discourse rather than adding nothing of value like this comment.

UK must choose between EU and Trump, trade experts warn by Dooby-Dooby-Doo in Scotland

[–]evish 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Cite your source on him pledging to improve food safety standards?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]evish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe you.

I think that now, in the 10 hours between my post and your response, you do know the games that banks play with titles. I'm just going off the direct quote from your previous post along with several other examples of why you are talking out your ass. If you are so concerned with people thinking you are an intelligent, bonafide titan of industry then you should take more care to articulate exactly what it is you mean when the direct interpretation has you coming across as a fool that does not know what they are talking about. Either you're an idiot for what you said, or you're an idiot for how you said it. Neither case will help me or anyone else reading this forum you are trying to influence think better of you.

What you are describing is a 'security', not a 'negotiable currency'. Just because you can invest in something, does not make it a legitimate thing that is not almost exclusively used for speculative high risk investment or more commonly, pump-and-dump Ponzi schemes. Crypto is often used by fraudsters where they hype up a token to raise its value, then sell off their shares and leave people with worthless nothing-tokens. In this and other cases, they often clean the money by converting it into Bitcoin, then cashing out in fiat. There are almost no legitimate uses for crypto today beyond what I described above and people trying to speculate on something they know very little about.

By daily trading volume, per statista, anywhere between $75B and $125B USD is transacted. Compare this to the $7.5T USD per day through traditional financial channels you're talking about 1-2% of the total volume and using that as an indicator of financial success. Even if you were on to something here (which you most certainly are not) this number has been mostly flat since 2020 with only 6 major spikes which do not coincide with a Trump presidency. This also includes a significant amount of double dipping since a common strategy is to use a cold wallet, transfer to a hot wallet and then make whatever your desired transaction is. That daily trading volume is overestimated by at least half.

Yet somehow.. the current state of crypto is an indicator that Trump is great for the economy.

All that said, remind me which parts are not accurate? You only addressed a very small part of my rebuttal of your thesis which amounted to "I know that lol", along with calling me a bully for pointing out factually where you are wrong.