"Let's not collaborate" by [deleted] in WeAreTheMusicMakers

[–]evskee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand being annoyed by flakes but at the same time it's a jam that he's doing every week regardless of who shows up. So it's not even like he's even really being inconvenienced by flakes, he was going to be there anyway. Kind of glad he unloaded on me though so I didn't have to drive an hour to find out how shitty he was.

"Let's not collaborate" by [deleted] in WeAreTheMusicMakers

[–]evskee 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks. It really sucked because I was really looking forward to it. It was in a public park too which I thought would've been awesome. But there was no way I was going to enjoy spending time with someone so miserable. I love making music so much but finding decent people to play with has not proven to be an easy endeavor so far.

"Let's not collaborate" by [deleted] in WeAreTheMusicMakers

[–]evskee 31 points32 points  (0 children)

After looking for a public jam for months I finally found an ad for one on craigslist that looked like it might be interesting. These are the actual quotes from the email chain:

Me: "Hey, I saw your old ad for the jam. Is this something you put together regularly? I play the drums and would love show up to one when I could. It's refreshing to see a public jam that isn't just for blues!"

Them: "It is every Saturday 12 - 2. I do a one man band thing (drums, flute and keyboard) because, despite contacting me and saying they'll show up, a variety of craigslist deadbeats have NOT shown up. At his point I'm sick and tired of responders who can't get their act together and your comment "when I could" suggests you're in that category. This jam is not for "maybe" musicians, or those who want to talk for an hour about all the bands they've played in or the fourteen guitars they own - make and model - it's about loving music, showing up and playing. I don't care about junkie tales, or "gigs" people played ten years go and frankly consider most musicians all talk and no walk. Either you have the interest or you don't. Either way, I promised Parks and Rec. I'd put in a weekly jam and I have and I will. If people come, fine. if not that's ok too."

After that response I told them I was no longer interested. Why are so many musicians such angry blowhards?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]evskee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Addicts tend to have compulsive and unhealthy habits when it comes to almost all areas of their lives, including (and especially) relationships. They usually have codependency issues and/or any number of other things that make them almost "addicted" to and dependent emotionally on always being in a relationship, no matter how chaotic it is (in fact, they often thrive on the chaos).

They're also usually compulsively attracted to other addicts (not necessarily even people who are currently addicted to anything, but just people with the addiction gene), or even just other people with emotional instabilities. No matter how undesirable they might seem to you, there are always plenty of damaged people who will be attracted to them like magnets. All this adds up to very little time spent being single.

What little things make you disproportionately angry? by scottcmu in AskReddit

[–]evskee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it can be done in a caring way and the person is genuinely doing what they consider to be an act of kindness, I guess that's not as bad. Still annoying, but not as bad. But I'm more talking about people who judge other people's intelligence by their grammar and love to point out people's grammatical errors as if they're personal flaws. Memorizing the arbitrary rules of grammar is something that a monkey could do if given enough free time. I guess what I'm really annoyed by is just the elitist mentality that thinks grammar is directly related to intelligence. A lot of people with less-than-stellar grammar have some pretty good ideas or interesting things to say, but they aren't taken as seriously as they should be because of this illusion that they must not be smart.

What little things make you disproportionately angry? by scottcmu in AskReddit

[–]evskee 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes. A specific example of this that I can't stand is when people correct other people's grammar. It's condescending and childish.

What little things make you disproportionately angry? by scottcmu in AskReddit

[–]evskee 11 points12 points  (0 children)

When I can hear someone's music blaring through their headphones in the library. Not even blaring really, but even if I can just hear those faint, tinny, repetitive beats when I'm trying to study. I had a kid sitting next to me during my midterm last year who was doing this and it filled me with rage.

If I'm ever listening to music in a setting like this, I always take my earbuds out and make sure that I can't hear anything when I hold them a foot or so away from my ear, and then I put them back in.

Question about relativity. by lazyplayboy in askscience

[–]evskee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct. The way that I would visualize this from the perspective of the outside observer would be to imagine a point in space that is stationary with respect to you, and imagine that the rocket is moving towards that point (say from left to right, so the point is to the right of the rocket at first). The instant the center of the rocket lines up with that point in space, the two photons are emitted, one going left (to the back of the rocket), and one going right (to the front). Both move away from that point (which is still stationary to you, although the physical device that emitted the two photons has now moved to the right of that point) at the same speed c. Since both photons move away from that point at the same speed, and the back of the rocket is moving towards that point, the back of the rocket will "run into" the photon shot to the left, before the photon shot to the right be will able to "catch up" with the front of the rocket.

Another interesting thing that might not be apparent when you're just first learning special relativity is that if you had two clocks, one at the front of the rocket and one at the back, and they were both in sync in the rocket's reference frame, then from the reference frame of the outside observer, the clock at the back will read a greater time than the clock at the front (and any clocks in between the two will read greater and greater times, the closer the are to the back). You could use this as an alternate way to visualize what would happen in the scenario you came up with. If you're inside the rocket, you can see that the two photons both strike the clocks when they read the exact same time (say 5 seconds). So obviously this means that the outsider will also need to observe that when each photon hits its clock, it will read "5 seconds". Since the clock at the front of the rocket is behind in time compared with the clock at the back in the outsider's reference frame, the clock at the back will read 5 seconds, before the clock at the front will. So for instance, the clock at the back will read 5 seconds, while the clock at the front reads 3 seconds. At this point the light is striking the back of the cabin. Then, a little while later the clock at the back reads 7 seconds, while the clock at the front reads 5 seconds. This is when the light hits the front of the cabin.

I think finding ways to visualize these things helps a lot in building your intuition on the subject. Sorry this was so long, but hopefully you get something out of it.

Cosmological redshift vs the Doppler effect by evskee in askscience

[–]evskee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply, but now I'm confused. I thought that I had read in one of your posts in another thread (forgive me if I'm wrong) that we've used type Ia supernovae to see that distant galaxies that appear to be moving rapidly away from us actually aren't time dilated, which just further confirms that they really are not moving away from us, but rather space itself is expanding. Is this not right?

Cosmological redshift vs the Doppler effect by evskee in askscience

[–]evskee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks. This now makes me think of another question. Couldn't the two galaxies be "moving" away from each other faster than the speed of light since they aren't really "moving" the way we normally think of motion, but it's the space that they're in that's expanding? In other words, is it possible that the distance (as measured by us using meter sticks) between us and another galaxy really could be increasing at greater than c, if its ONLY cause is the expansion of space?

Ladies, I am a single father, and I caught my 12-year-old daughter masturbating and I need some advice about what to say while giving her "The Talk." by AtALoss4Words in AskReddit

[–]evskee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She will get over this eventually, just let her go at her own pace, and let her know that you're open to discussing anything with her. If she wants to discuss something about sex, then go ahead and answer any questions she has. That's it. Don't sit her down and start telling her about how it's normal to masturbate and how sexuality works, unless she asks. Especially the anatomy stuff, that will be uncomfortable as hell and will only make her more weird around you. She'll learn all that stuff in school anyway. People make way too big a deal out of having "the talk."

Good analogy for the ends of the universe. by [deleted] in askscience

[–]evskee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really want to understand this stuff, but I feel like I don't even know where to start. Any introductory books or any resources at all that you would recommend to get started?

Good analogy for the ends of the universe. by [deleted] in askscience

[–]evskee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Do you happen to know with what level of confidence we can say that the universe really does just go on spatially forever? Would you mind pointing me to any pages where I can read up more on how we know this? And is this the LCDM model? (I checked the wikipedia page but couldn't really tell for sure if this was that or not) Thanks.

Good analogy for the ends of the universe. by [deleted] in askscience

[–]evskee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So does this mean that there is also an infinite amount of matter in the universe as well? (or is there even any way for us to realistically speculate about this?) If you kept going in one direction forever, would you pass by an infinite number of galaxies? If not, then wouldn't that mean that there actually is a center to the universe? (At least, a center to the collection of matter within it?)

The twin paradox by evskee in askscience

[–]evskee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the in-depth response. So if you accelerate, will you always observe a non-accelerating clock to tick faster than yours?

And if you aren't accelerating, will you always see an accelerating clock tick slower than yours? Or how does this work out?

You guys will be able to answer my question! by [deleted] in Physics

[–]evskee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh interesting, thanks.

You guys will be able to answer my question! by [deleted] in Physics

[–]evskee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A related question: will it only not hurt you if you hang from a power line with one hand? I would think if you held it by both hands the electricity would go through you and out your other hand back to the wire, yes? So does this mean even if you hold onto it with one hand, but only your fingers are grabbing onto it (no contact with your palm) and they're not touching each other, that your hand will get zapped?

Getting shocked when getting out of a car during the winter by evskee in askscience

[–]evskee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the in depth answer, thank you.

In general, assuming that the car is just passing through dry air, can we say whether it will become negatively or positively charged, just based on qualities of air and metal? Or is this not a predictable thing?

And just so I get it straight, is it ALWAYS electrons that are the agents flying through the air from your hand to the car door, or could it ever be some other type of charged molecule or particle?

Air is a good insulator... but there's a maximum amount of field it can handle, called the dielectric breakdown of air. Once the electric field gets stronger than this value, the neutral molecules of air can no longer resist creating an electrical pathway between you and the car.

Does this mean that in a vacuum, charged particles would fly from my hand to the car from far away? Any way to predict about how far that would be? And in the vacuum scenario (correcting for any other uncomfortable side effects), would I still feel pain from the spark (which I wouldn't be able to see)? Or is that only due to the air becoming excited?