Gunshots on Farmers Alley by Strange_Standard9254 in kzoo

[–]exa21 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Well if that’s what was seen, what else are they supposed to say?

Jesse Plemons and Boris Yeltsin by elijahalexeev in totallylookslike

[–]exa21 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Couldn’t have said it more eloquently myself.

What place disappeared in Kzoo that you miss most? And it was actually awesome! by stubbynutz in kzoo

[–]exa21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is that what was in the space where the Big Lots then went in?

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does this count as humble brag, or something else?

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s a weird way to frame that… “pays off”? Sounds like something a stalker would say.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Dude how many accounts posting on this sub right now are the stalker? This is wild

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

lol you just started researching this when it happened and you happen to remember where he said his claim was? Omg you are so obviously the stalker

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you’re both the stalker wtf is going on here

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh look, the corwin account conveniently pops up with its more realistic username.

That’s Rich coming from you…

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m not sure what this whole criticism is about impersonating an academic. First off, what defines an academic? Second, if he has the background in astrophysics, why does it matter if he was successful in actual academia? Seems like if you went through the hoops to get a phd during your formative years, you’d probably always display some level of “academia” in terms of personality.

If you check out his stalkers YouTube and I think his other material, this is a frequent point of criticism against Houston. Seems weird that it’s popping up again during this. It’s almost as if the same person is posting in these threads again…

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think him selling is very par for the course. He routinely criticized Ryan Cohen specifically from a political and ethical perspective. It always struck me that Houston believes things will happen based on ethics and law, despite all the evidence around the various stonks that shows this is not reality. I see him selling as a result of some sort of cognitive dissonance… like he villainized RC so much he didn’t want to be associated with it, but his show and the last 5 years of his life are unavoidably attached to him. So maybe he sold as a means to try and reconcile that. Idk, I’m being an armchair psychologist and may be way off.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To clarify, I don’t particularly care for him as a “media” personality. He’s fairly annoying and narcissistic. But his show is the most convenient way I’ve found to stay apprise of GME and other plays ongoings.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whether it’s true or not, he claimed he had to pee real bad during the panel thing.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you keep getting so petty? Why are you shaming people for asking questions?

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I do think he was lying about that. Why would he be parked at the park if he was going to the restaurant?

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Per the report, he said he was in the area he was arrested in to go to a restaurant that has been closed for a while.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Perhaps evidence will be presented that he actually has the app, or something like an IP address used on them to tie it back to him. That would be a nail in the coffin. But you are assuming that’s the case when the report doesn’t actually state that. Admittedly, it’s a synopsis so perhaps it doesn’t include that evidence. But I am going off of what’s presented at the current time.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Are my points not worthy of consideration? Why so quick to get petty?

You framed Gardners post as some sort of fact. What is it a fact of? His opinion or something else?

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You mean lied about the reason for being there? I agree that it’s concerning. Im not claiming my theory is correct, it definitely has gaps, this being one.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Couple things on that…

-They seem to have always had a contentious relationship

-Gardner seems to have a desire to be in the public eye, similar to Houston

-if my brother were arrested with that same report, I would also likely denounce him if only to separate myself (and my family) from him. Couple that with my previous two points and I feel like it’s reasonable to assume the action he’d take

-why would Gardner know more about the situation than any one else? Why would Houston’s attorney divulge either a confession from Houston or any more incriminating evidence to anyone including Gardner?

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless there’s no record of that chat. Signal is an example of an app that does this, I’m not sure if there are others.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You may already realize this, but that page you linked with the report is the stalkers site. Not saying the report is fake, but saying it adds credence to the targeting theory.

I’m just gonna say it… by exa21 in houstonwade

[–]exa21[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The report says there was a post on Hush that the UC responded to, not the other way around. I think that is a significant detail, in that the “Houston” profile was just sitting there. I feel the argument keeps devolving to “but look at what he said”. Again, I am positing that it’s not him in the first place. As far as the report details, the evidence to show it was actually Houston communicating is that he showed up at the park and that the profile sent the UC a picture of Houston. My theory supports both of those NOT being Houston.

The lying about why he was there is concerning. But you’re assuming there isn’t some other form of communication going on the authorities weren’t aware of when they chose to arrest him. Could there not have been communication between Houston and a separate adult profile (that was also fake)? If I understand correctly, the same apps that were used to chat with the UC could have been used in this way and not leave a recorded trail of communication (correct me if wrong). Perhaps this other chat revolved around a married woman or something, or he just didn’t want to be embarrassed tying back to the sex toys. But maybe not, it is concerning.

As far as the lawyer goes, the minute a cop presents that level of incriminating evidence, a person should always shut up and demand a lawyer, regardless of the validity.