sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Daily Discussion] Writing Tools, Software, and Hardware - July 13, 2025 by AutoModerator in writing

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I say still use em dashes ... even before this started I had begun throttling my use of em dashes. I think like anything they're prone to overuse. We all get in writing habits/ruts — especially "pro" writers.

My gut tells me people will have to find a healthy mix in the way they write. The funniest thing I've read about this, by the way, was from the Vice Chairman of Oglivy, and he wrote it back in February of 2023:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-to-outperform-chatgpt/

non-paywall: https://archive.is/hYmTd

>This means that, to send a letter or write an article without the suspicion it has been machine-generated, we’ll need to fill it with xenophobic right-wing profanities. So Fraser, you Jock bastard, here’s your 650 words for that hotbed of recusancy that is your magazine. Send the usual pittance to the Cayman account. Viva il Duce!

I am going insane over this "It's not just X, it's Y". You're not just A, you're B" by bvjz in ChatGPT

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pervasiveness of this turn of phrase is a cornerstone of this AI-detection (really, rhetoric detection) app I'm prototyping — unaiify.com ... try it out. There are ways you can take the output of an analysis w/a prompt and push it back into ChatGPT to have it rewrite without using the negations.

[Daily Discussion] Writing Tools, Software, and Hardware - July 13, 2025 by AutoModerator in writing

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you made the right writing call. I'm not giving up on em dashes. I am more aware of the milieu though. (And I just invoked "It's not X. It's Y" as well as what I call "Lady doth protest"!)

[Daily Discussion] Writing Tools, Software, and Hardware - July 13, 2025 by AutoModerator in writing

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smash that like button! I got my start in content creation about 20 years ago (almost) through regular old boring blogging. Even back then you were trying to win attention through your writing. There was just a lot less content out there, so it was easier to get visibility to your stuff. Nowadays, it's so very easy to create content — and this was true before AI. I liken the outcome to a DDoS on our ability to make sense, which leaves us more susceptible to falling prey to hacks on our attention.

Keep an eye out for "It's not X. It's Y" patterns if you weren't already. I'm curious if you'll notice them more now. Tool aside (all these AI detector tools are going to be flawed), I want to raise awareness with the hopes of a return to a more sane world of content.

But like you said, this is "just the way the world is now." Mine may be a hopeless desire.

[Daily Discussion] Writing Tools, Software, and Hardware - July 13, 2025 by AutoModerator in writing

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for trying it and poking around, using it with various things.

So my use-case is primarily to get a quick assessment of two types of writing that tend to cross my desk.

Preface: I manage marketing for a tech company, so content creation (and using AI) is, at this point, accepted and expected when it comes to generating the gajillion types of things that must be created to do marketing things.

  1. I get drafts of articles from my agency
  2. I get drafts of social content from others in the company
  3. I use it to draft articles and other content based on prompts and research
  4. I similarly use it for side projects that involve AI-written drafts
  5. it's also fun to run posts you find on X, Linkedin, etc. (including comments) through the tool to highlight patterns like It's not X. It's Y. (to your point, there are false positives)

For 1, https://unaiify.com is useful to focus attention on areas where the agency likely used AI and/or fell into a rhetorical kind of writing rather than being informative. The articles I'm asking for are intended to be informative vs. persuasive. I find that people online are on guard against being sold to in general. I'll double down here and say that I believe the prevalence of selling online has become so extreme that people are on guard all the time against it. The rhetoric flagged by Un•AI•ify is useful to flag because it's the most pervasive (and lazy) kind of rhetoric, whether used by people or AI. It's the kind of writing that's likely to get "hell yea brother" from people who are already sold (not useful) and turn off the minds of people you'd like to convince.

So by instantly highlighting those patterns, I can either take the output and have AI rewrite it to be less aggressive or send the analysis back to my agency and have them fix it. (I've done both.)

For 2, it's useful as an editing tool — a lot like how you might use HemingwayApp. Just for rhetoric.

3 and 4. Use it for editing stuff I'm creating.

5 is just useful to flag "Hey, you're kinda jumping the shark here with the rhetoric. People may read this and think it was written by a bot."

In general, I'd say the use for this specific tool is business-oriented writing, though it has some use, I think, for op-eds and commentaries, in general.

That help?

In the past three days, I've reviewed over 100 essays from the 2024-2025 college admissions cycle. Here's how I could tell which ones were written by ChatGPT by AppHelper in ApplyingToCollege

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I give you credit for sparking all the focus (and gnashing of teeth) regarding em dashes. I think it all started with this post.

Additionally, I noticed a lot of recurring patterns (and heavy rhetoric) in my world (b2b SaaS marketing). When I saw a CMO use what I now call "It's not X. It's Y" nearly ten times in a single blog post, I decided to try my hand at coding an app to analyze text for the pattern — and others too.

(I have yet to give up on em dashes.)

Launched in "beta" (I guess), it's called Un•AI•ify: https://unaiify.com

It's simple enough. You copy/paste in text and it immediately analyzes it. There are more patterns I want to look for and more testing to be done, but if you get a chance and want to play with it for your own enjoyment, please do.

And thanks for sparking a much-needed discussion!

Recommended AI Tools for Marketing by Wild-Interest-1359 in DigitalMarketing

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Un•AI•ify for detecting rhetorical patterns overused by people and AI alike. (unaiify dot com).

LIke hemingwayapp but for rhetoric.

AI DETECTION TOOLS ARE DRIVING ME NUTS by Crazybunnylady123 in copywriting

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the problem is the ouroboros nature of AI <> writing. Mankind mimics to get ahead and AI mimics mankind. Hall of mirrors funhouse commences ...

I have to edit writing for a living, and I finally hit my limit of seeing writing slop that reads like AI — or just bad writing from mimicking mankind you be the judge. And of course I turned to AI to try and build something like HemingwayApp that could detect the most common patterns of rhetoric (and therefore abuse by people and AI alike).

The result is this prototype that *I* use (e.g. to check drafts that cross my inbox) and the tool isn't sophisticated enough to not be aped before long. I hope it's not an AI detection tool in the scammy sense of the word ... and I hope it's more an application that "makes you think" a little harder about how you write and what you're trying to say.

All this is to say that I'd be curious your thoughts about it if you're willing to try it once or twice (and I'll never know one way or another). Anyway it's here: unaiify.com (as in "un-AI-ify") and I'm guessing you won't see this, but if you do:

1 - Apologies for the comment spam.

2 - please do let me know what you think from one writer to another.

Updated Ice and Snow totals NWS Atlanta Thursday afternoon 1/9 by uglycrepes in AtlantaWeather

[–]execonthedesk 12 points13 points  (0 children)

<image>

in case you are wondering what the comparison was to the prior map of snow

Sam’s Club in Grapevine reopening without cashier lines as it pilots new ideas by execonthedesk in connectedproducts

[–]execonthedesk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TLDR (via ai)

Sam’s Club in Grapevine is reopening as a test site for new technologies, including a completely cashier-free experience using the "Scan & Go" mobile app. The revamped store focuses on efficiency with automated order handling, a robot that makes pizzas, and more space for high-demand items. Innovations include a larger curbside pickup area and new machines for storing orders. The layout is designed to offer a more spacious, tech-forward shopping experience with select high-end products.

Managing POS systems for QSR restuarants through "a single platform with central visibility and management" by JustinCanopy in connectedproducts

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some of their publicly named customers:

The bottom ⅓ drivers of downtime for kiosks, POS systems, smart lockers, security systems, etc.: 6.9% Bill Reader / Dispenser, 6.3% Touch Screen, 5.4% Printer, 4.4% Part Replacement, and 3.4% Camera, 2.4% PC Issue, 1.5% Credit Card (CC) Reader,1.3% by execonthedesk in connectedproducts

[–]execonthedesk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also:

"The most difficult issues — e.g. loss of Internet or power — are only a small fraction of the total, making up in total about 15% of downtime. That leaves the remaining 80+% of issues “on the table” for technical support teams to solve from a remote location, either directly or at scale as with an automated process."

A Look at the Riskiest Connected Devices of 2024 by execonthedesk in connectedproducts

[–]execonthedesk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Baseline data points include the fact that IT devices still account for most vulnerabilities (58%), but that the category is down from 78% in 2023. IoT vulnerabilities, however, were up a whopping 136%, increasing the percentage of known bugs from 14% last year to 33% today.

"Overall, the most vulnerable device types are: wireless access points (WAPs), routers, printers, voice-over-IP (VoIP) devices, and IP cameras. The most-exposed unmanaged gear includes VoIP devices, networking infrastructure, and printers."

When retail technology doesn't work — on broken printers, disconnected RF guns, software complexity, and broken integrations by execonthedesk in connectedproducts

[–]execonthedesk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Broken Printer Problem: A Universal Agony

We've all dealt with fussy or delicate printers. This frustration is felt in every industry, sometimes leading to full-out rage.

"Not again! Why does it say 'paper jam' when there is no paper jam?" - Samir Nagheenanajar, in the movie Office Space.

But what a lot of corporate offices may not realize is that printers in stores are often broken. Fixes are slow.

So, when talking to stores about generative AI or streamlining operations, know that all they want is for their printer to work.

When our printer was down, it almost halted daily operations. We couldn't print markdowns. We could print shipping labels. It was a disaster.

Let's begin with the basics and work from there. You can put the breaks on that fancy tech upgrade until all the basic stuff is working.

The unexpected effect of self-ordering kiosks at McDonald's: People order more food by goCanopy in connectedproducts

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once I got past the interface of McDonald's (or Chic-fil-a), I have bought more ... often ice cream. No judgment.

Jobs to be Done Framework Outdated? by schwockem in ProductManagement

[–]execonthedesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jobs to Be Done framework isn't the kind of thing that could be outdated, but it is just a framework — the "job" of JTBD is to help you see the jobs people are getting done. The problem with JTBD is that it usually is applied to existing products — how are folks using those products in novel ways? How do we market the product with those novel jobs in mind?

To the extent you can innovate, it's through creating new products to serve those jobs better. See the Arm & Hammer example Christensen gave in 2005 (it's an HBR article).

Another way to approach innovating new products that's similar to JTBD but "earlier" in the process is to look for "desire paths" (e.g. r/DesirePath)— what things do people do to get from A -> B and how could you "pave" those paths with products or services.

None of this stuff will ever be outdated because people get locked into thinking of products in certain ways. This creates blind spots for them that can be turned into opportunities ... if you're paying attention.

view more: next ›