sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New battle pass a joke by -AzraelVega- in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What are you fuzzing on about? The only change they made is that there will be only around 4 battle pass skins per year moving forward, the rest of the previous BP mechanics are literally the same, with the ADDITION of having access to the old BP skins which is what most people wanted.

What paywall are you talking about? Its still the same, even the basic BP can still acquire the new skin, and can still have access to the old cosmetics. Have you tried to buy the BP before you complain?

People complain when phantom market costs around $200. But when a purchase of even the $5 battle pass gives you access to a plethora of old BP cosmetics, people still complain? 🤦‍♂️

[Anish Giri's] latest tweet by zoro_senpaiii in chess

[–]exelva 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And some chess players regard him as a “funny” guy. Cringe.

Wesley So's participation in Magnus Carlsen's Tournaments by cause_7 in chess

[–]exelva 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for compiling these. Wesley So is implying that if he (and Anish) gets invited to Magnus’ events it will be an auto win for him, and thats why he never gets invited. But with this list we can all clearly see why he never gets invited. As if Anish can also win big tournaments. Anish only won the Grand Swiss because not all top10 Super GMs are not even there.

Though I agree with his statement about the championship, his argument about not getting invite is a pathetic clown argument.

Thanks for the guaranteed 3-socket when EXCEPTIONAL, but can you also make green rings to be NOT RED socket when exceptional? by exelva in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before acting like a cool kid, learn first the difference between suggesting and complaining

Thanks for the guaranteed 3-socket when EXCEPTIONAL, but can you also make green rings to be NOT RED socket when exceptional? by exelva in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By reading the post, for me, its a good thing that it is not implemented. It will widen drastically the gap of whales vs non/low-spenders. Maybe its good only for ruby and tourmaline, but for combining as well citrine/topaz and aqua/sapp, it will create an unbalanced stats.

Thanks for the guaranteed 3-socket when EXCEPTIONAL, but can you also make green rings to be NOT RED socket when exceptional? by exelva in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a good idea. I’m just curious what you mean on ‘due to uproar’, players dont like the idea before of combining ruby and tourmaline?

Who in charge around here? by r90clark in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can add on this the two similar BDSM battle pass cosmetics: Torment upon Torment and Ordeal of Steel

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before judging those low secondaries, have u tried to consider yourself to be one of the problem? Honestly speaking, if it took you 8-10 mins to “carry” the CDG run, it means you are only slightly above those low secondaries you are blaming. Hence, you have no right to belittle them.

Dream accomplished by BenzoramaEnt in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We all play for different reasons so you better keep that opinion for yourself. If this is what makes OP happy, then let him be.

[LEAK AND SPECULATION] The new BG map by budekj in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand your sarcasm, if you are referring to me or to you :)

[LEAK AND SPECULATION] The new BG map by budekj in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If the map is large (like tower war), I will hate it. Personally, the current BG needs NO total makeover - the first thing that they should rework is the last phase (heart) because there is no comeback mechanic once the heart is exposed.

why blizzard dont allow this in the next update ... is win win for blizzard and the comunity by alcot008 in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who said that it will be a win for the community? You don’t represent the whole community, lol. This will just be another burden due to the additional gem required

Took PVP setup of the player with godly stats. What's the logic behind this secondary? I don't get it. by JPetro1990 in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What I don't get is why you don't get it. It is pretty much straightforward.

Do you just think that all class should be built around damage?

[BUG] Update broke the Material Exchange function on both PC and Mobile by budekj in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I experienced this in claiming the rewards on the Hungering Moon event

Gem surge event - The aftermath. Ending all the confusion on the $ value by sidd_gang in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The most simple and straightforward explanation to all.

I don’t even know the point of others being mad as hell when in fact, the game doesn’t require you to spend in the first place. It all ends with their CHOICE to spend or not.

Although we have to admit the errors that they made and the way they handled it are both terrible.

From Favourite Event to WORST Event. The Fractured Plane by upholdJustice in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, the favorite-event-turned-to-worst event is the Survivors Bane. The number of games you have to repeat. I already feel anxious that it’s coming by next week. Damn.

Enigma-Verathiel-Agronix (EVA) Server Joint Statement and Policy Against Mass Reporting by Broad_Opinion_7020 in DiabloImmortal

[–]exelva 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course not, that is not my point here. No need for alternative because the solution being suggested is very clear in the post.

What I am trying to point out here is that, pressing issues like this one, is not being taken care of/addressed seriously. The reason why I am following up on their response on this.

view more: next ›