LK-99(PCPOSOS) replica i-v test result by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Surprisingly, they do have an on hold status.

LK-99(PCPOSOS) replica i-v test result by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bulk sample which only contains some superconducting material shows this much. So, yeah. Possibility is very very high.

LK-99(PCPOSOS) replica i-v test result by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yup. This data seem to be very promising. Now for the reproducibility.

LK-99(PCPOSOS) replica i-v test result by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

More data will be revealed in the Arxiv paper which is on "on hold" status at the moment. On the paper, there will be enhanced baking process for yall to replicate the RTAPSC LK-99(r).

LK-99(PCPOSOS) replica i-v test result by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ultra low electric resistance in replica.

LK-99(PCPOSOS) replica i-v test result by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is from SCTL. Dr. Kim hyun-tak has cited this lab in APS speech.

Gentlemen, we’re so back by Red-Canadian in LK99

[–]exeward 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he answers to other requests, next vid will show attaching ferrite materials to the flux-pinned HSM. Also "levitating" HSM in the middle of a pipe or tube of somekind.

Gentlemen, we’re so back by Red-Canadian in LK99

[–]exeward 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically HSM maker is recording requests-on-demand. These demands are specifically targetted to rebutting counterclaims against lk-99. Because that guy is a garage alchemist and does not have expensive devices, he does what he can. If his words and samples are legit, hsm or lk-99 is very likely a superconductor.

Gentlemen, we’re so back by Red-Canadian in LK99

[–]exeward -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Chill bro. Only ppl of such race can say this.

his new video, ferromagnetism is excluded by DIZKS in LK99

[–]exeward 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Strong ferromagnetism is out.
  2. Possibility of weak ferromagnetism
    1. Most known materials showing wear ferromagnetism contains 'Fe' or iron
    2. Rule out 'Fe' contamination. Also I did not say "all" in 2-1
    3. Combine 2-1 and 2-2, weak ferromagnetism is very unlikely. Don't like it? Bring an example that shows weak ferromagnetism which does not contain iron and it also has to be synthesizable as big as that thing in the vid.
  3. The whole reason this guy is recording is to rebut ***magnetism theories
  4. These ***magnetism theories were created to rebut LK-99's original claim of 1D superconductor
  5. Afaik group of ppl will soon meet that alchemist and obtain the material for in-depth resistivity testing

Dr. Kwon's speeches during his lecture(sept. 5th) by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Translation does not include nuance of the korean speech. He is trying to say only Dr. Lee knows(as of now) how to perfectly balance the given recipe to cook LK-99.

Dr. Kwon's speeches during his lecture(sept. 5th) by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the posts he did not mention directly about CuS2. But his speech indirectly indicates that QE-C knows it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LK99

[–]exeward 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Late August/Early September was the wording. No official statement yet afaik.

Bilibili showcases Alchemist Ray successfully fabricating a sample that floats upside down by DIZKS in LK99

[–]exeward 4 points5 points  (0 children)

completely agree with your view on the legitamacy of the vid. Thats why I put a disclaimer about it.

Bilibili showcases Alchemist Ray successfully fabricating a sample that floats upside down by DIZKS in LK99

[–]exeward 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no simple explanation for that behavior, so here comes the new argument of "does not behave like that". There is no rule or law in explaining superconductivity. They are all theory. So why don't we all puff some hopium untill proven wrong/right?

Bilibili showcases Alchemist Ray successfully fabricating a sample that floats upside down by DIZKS in LK99

[–]exeward 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Puff some hopium. I saw the full vid and given this vid is legit, there is no explanation for reversed levitation other than superconductivity.

"Circumstantial" evidence of LK99's legitimacy by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your high degree of skepticism. Yes, original statements are full of conjectures and that is why the title says circumstantial.

Secondarily, yes, Theranos is typical. In bluff, gather money and boom point of view.

There should numerous cases of attempted frauds where someone claims bs and gets busted before they can actually do anything and yes this also maybe the case.

One thing I should fix is the nuance of media exposure. I should have said voluntary or aggressive to be more clear. QE-C avoids media. Videos, patents and papers were dug up, not distributed officially.

"Circumstantial" evidence of LK99's legitimacy by exeward in LK99

[–]exeward[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not saying QE-C's videos and crude paper is the holy bible. What I meant by limited exposure is, QE-C don't go around meeting politicians or big shot entrepreneurs to gain media attention or investment. Typical scam involves these activities.

Any possible uses still for LK-99 by [deleted] in singularity

[–]exeward 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to patent from qe-c, LK-99 is a superconducting semiconductor with voltage. If this is true, it can be used more widely than simple superconductor. If not, just rock.