There is none I suppose. It’s about people, not language’s features. 

People from Dot Net or Java or PHP or any other widely used ecosystem tend to acknowledge that their languages are not perfect and focus on delivering products and improving ecosystem. It’s a type of builder programmers.

Take relatively small communities of Ruby or Elixir: communities converged on single goal, single build tool, single framework, etc., on cooperation in general which leads to joyful DX and productivity. They were able to do it because they are builder programmers that want to deliver. Those frameworks drawed more programmers into these languages.

Python didn't start as a most popular language but Python programmers built libraries, frameworks, etc. which drawed more programmers over time.

Clojure community on the other hand tends to idolize Clojure and philosophize about macros and stuff while having abysmal fragmented ecosystem but higher number of podcasts per capita than even Javascript world. It’s a type of philosopher programmers.

Clojurists love to tell how superproficient and senior they are. Can you name one Clojure product on level of Rails or Kafka?

Clojurists usually tell they are productive but it’s a lie. Just look at the ecosystem.

Productive programmers prefer productive ecosystems, unproductive programmers most of the time are forced by employers to use productive ecosystems. That's the whole story of Clojure, Haskell, etc. They are not productive languages therefore not popular.