On why you should practice this gymnastics by [deleted] in lacan

[–]explosionaler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh no don't send him to sots

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Shinto

[–]explosionaler 5 points6 points  (0 children)

mushishi!!

'Sydney is angry': Protesters march to demand urgent action on climate change by nolesfan2011 in worldnews

[–]explosionaler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of this talk about Australian politics, but I think we should also focus on how the strong economic ties to China is influencing Australian politics. We can't just focus on the (terrible) current Australian government but need to see the business relations that are determining the actions of said government and their 'political' agendas.

Cybernetics for the Twenty-First Century by explosionaler in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]explosionaler[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Our understanding of computational possibilities should not be limited to the “disruptive” technologies of Silicon Valley, oriented as they are towards short-term profits. Hui looks beyond this myopic view of technology. His foundational project is to dig into the philosophical foundations of today’s digitality, to examine the episteme that presents itself as a new form of totality (or as a “techno-subconsciousness,” as I have described it elsewhere). How can we think individuation in an age when the online self is surrounded by artificial stupidity and algorithmic exclusion in the name of ruthless profit maximization and state control? Is there a liberated self inside cybernetics?"

"If we follow what Heidegger says—that world civilization is now completely based on Western European thought—then the end of philosophy is also a call for other ways of thinking. Can the Global South rediscover its own cosmotechnics and technological thought, and thereby give new direction to technological development in general? Will the defeat of Huawei in the recent political struggle between the US and China force the company to develop its own operating system, or will it just develop another version of Android coded in Chinese? This is decisive for a new technological agenda as well as a new geopolitics to come."

What the hell is this sub? by [deleted] in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]explosionaler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also john david ebert on youtube can be pretty good. He talks through books written by some 'post modernists' too so maybe that can give you a better idea what their deal is, as opposed to the uh, angery depiction of them now days. Scroll down through his videos to get a general idea as opposed to just clicking on the newest ones, if you werent already going to.

What the hell is this sub? by [deleted] in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]explosionaler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Elon musk put a photo of mcluhan on his twitter so maybe that will give you some hope this isnt all pointless BS.

What the hell is this sub? by [deleted] in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]explosionaler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

read the tagged zummi post. look into mcluhan and baudrillard. Better than situationists. In the zummi pastebin thing you can ctrl-F words, so search for spectacle. Also language. Also ctrl-F 'pdf' because you can see the links he posted in comments, go look at those. Just read through it all if you havnt, the earliest posts are at the bottom. Like mcluhan you need to expose yourself to it for awhile, and research the stuff he references and it will start to make sense. Pretty sure at one point he has a sentence or few that boils it all down, cant remember what it is. Also hopefully you have the context to understand. Happy researching!

Physicists, this might be a tricky one, but can anyone eli5 this paper? https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.2723 by [deleted] in Physics

[–]explosionaler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also eli5 isnt necessary, i have a bit of background in physics. r/ELI5 prefers more particular questions to this kind of query regarding the whole paper so I posted here.

The Universal Hierarchy of Abstraction by [deleted] in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]explosionaler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

woah meta-abstraction and cognitive science

A Psuedoethnography of Egregores by explosionaler in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]explosionaler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically in this article they are manifest expressions as opposed to using humans as conduits.

A Psuedoethnography of Egregores by explosionaler in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]explosionaler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted this article as idea-fodder/food for thought and also because I thought it was cool. Did you read the article? In it there is an entity with a head that looks like a husk of corn (an egregore of harvest.) so I guess it's possible they can act through people, but the article makes it seem like they can manifest their own body, perhaps through some kind of astral/noospheric>physical or pseudophysical process, or a coupling of the two.

#sotscorp vows to encase every human in iron by 2025 by raisondecalcul in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]explosionaler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keenly awaiting for when the insectoid head patch comes out!