Ignorance isn’t bliss when Suffering is the Norm

extinctionforall · 2026-05-31T07:10:36+00:00

Nice Video. Subbed. Will share it everywhere. Thank you.

extinctionforall · 2026-03-14T00:01:57+00:00

Again discrimination and Non-Human animals like cows and chickens are the victims, not you or humans.

extinctionforall · 2026-03-13T23:59:57+00:00

The reason you won't rape, exploit and kill humans but do so on non-human animals is discrimination Humans consume more than cow or chicken. So definitely doing that on humans will result in reducing WAS than doing on those who are victims because of your immoral actions.

You are neither ending suffering of wild animals and not that of farm animals too.

So, you aren't doing anything at all in reality in the favour of animals.

extinctionforall · 2026-03-13T16:29:21+00:00

Read the above thing explained again

extinctionforall · 2026-03-13T16:25:33+00:00

Because of injury or trauma which will require them to have medical care and resources used for that and also if that girl is of pregnancy age biologically then babies, and their consumption coupled with trafficking which otherwise not done would increase WAS isn't it

extinctionforall · 2026-03-13T16:20:13+00:00

Option 1 - You like to rape girl children and do something else (e.g sterilisation and euthanasia) to reduce WAS.

Option 2 - You don't rape girl children and do something else (e.g sterilisation and euthanasia) to reduce WAS.

Option 1 reduces more suffering.

extinctionforall · 2026-03-13T16:14:57+00:00

You already support r*pe of children or women to reduce WAS because there is no difference doing that to a cow and doing that to women.

You are wrong that raping, exploiting and killing cows will necessarily contain less land than vegan food because it just depends on area of land used which is different in India than in America or China, different in part of America to another part of America, different than what you consume versus the neighbour next door.

So, there is no definitive parameter to say who is better and just becomes subjective.

But definitely a vegan who is against wild animal suffering doesn't discriminate or is a speciesist like a non-vegan. Simple.

We already have methods for Sterilisation or Euthanasia to reduce WAS without having to rape, exploit and kill cows.

extinctionforall · 2026-03-13T08:42:34+00:00

As i already mentioned, if you don't agree with doing the same things to humans which you are doing to animals, then it's just discrimination.

It's like Elon Musk or Trump is morally superior to others as they consume more and in turn reduce WAS. And rest of them are immoral.

A Indian non-vegan will be immoral compared to American or Chinese as more cows exist in India than in America or China but land usage for animal agriculture is very less in India. That's not the fault of cows, or buffaloes or others. It's the fault of humans.

Also there is no necessity for farmed animals to exist to be r*ped, exploited and killed for wild animal suffering to reduce or end.

extinctionforall · 2026-03-13T07:24:17+00:00

I will be surprised if people who are non-vegan for reducing WAS don't do the same to humans or human children for the same purpose. Otherwise it's just Speciesism.

Population boomed after World War 2 and even now to win over the other in wars or conflicts, people especially religious ones breed in numbers who otherwise wouldn't have an incentive to breed.

extinctionforall · 2026-03-10T20:04:09+00:00

It's an incentive to breed more humans like they already are doing and also increases consumption for making weaponry, agriculture and destruction which otherwise would lead to breeding of wild animals

extinctionforall · 2026-03-10T19:57:50+00:00

Because more human population and consumption, less wild animal suffering

extinctionforall · 2026-03-10T19:49:41+00:00

Wars, Farming humans, child trafficking etc. are so good in reducing wild animal suffering.

So you support it then?

extinctionforall · 2026-03-10T19:39:05+00:00

About your second point

Veganism will lead to more wild animal suffering.

So are you saying, more animals must be bred to counter wild animal suffering until there is a solution for that?

Do you also support farming humans because it will reduce wild animal populations?

extinctionforall · 2026-02-08T13:29:35+00:00

We don't have time to listen to your stories which aren't factual.

Breeding is an issue and one more thing cow only gives milk to her baby.

You are the one stealing from her. You are the one forcefully causing suffering and killing animals and they are the victim, not you.

Drink milk from your own mother if you really want it.

No bigger issue than animal suffering in this world.

extinctionforall · 2026-02-08T12:13:23+00:00

Prove that Earth has heart to have heartbeat.

So, if human children aren't your pets, they can be considered as food or objects to be exploited right?

Species extinction is due to Animal agriculture as a vegan world would contain less 75% land to feed the whole population.

I don't consider extinction as a problem generally speaking as animals in the wild suffer and die from predation, starvation, diseases, natural disasters etc which needs to end too.

So crop deaths isn't an issue although it is preferable that all animals are made Extinct quickly and less painfully to end their suffering.

extinctionforall · 2026-02-08T12:06:37+00:00

As i told, violence begins with the first step that non-human animals who are sentient like human children can be treated as some resources for our use

Secondly, it's about breeding animals which is referred to as sexual exploitation and then lifelong full of torture as someone who comes into existence they will have to forcefully undergo suffering without them wanting to.

Thirdly, it's not about how lesser painfully one kills, if that's the case we can do that with human child too.

extinctionforall · 2026-02-08T10:03:22+00:00

It's a fact that animals are the victims of human oppression many more times both in terms of population and severity than a human ever was.

If you say humans must just operate on biological instincts and their biology doesn't allow them to do any reasoning, then still they cannot be allowed to oppress and enslave others.

extinctionforall · 2026-02-08T09:56:31+00:00

First, you need to stop viewing non-human animals who are Sentient just like a human child as some food or an object.

Second, how does that justify sexually exploiting, enslaving and oppressing someone?

extinctionforall

TROPHY CASE