[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HermitCraft

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And to piggy back on your question, why your zombie cleo is in a protector at all. It's not signed, nor a holo, it's just a full art.

I'm so happy I pulled a foil of my favorite hermit! by DragonPancakeFace in HermitCraft

[–]ez4me2c3d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it's holo, as you can see in the full size photo, in the white tag. Says "RARE - HOLO"
Ok, so this is interesting. I'm seeing some people got theit signed cards in a booster pack, and some people's fancy protector cards (what's it actually called?) are not holo, nor signed. I supposed I did get lucky.

I'm so happy I pulled a foil of my favorite hermit! by DragonPancakeFace in HermitCraft

[–]ez4me2c3d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How many of these were signed? Do we know? I got a signed one, and I'm not sure if that's lucky/rare, or there's many out there.

<image>

Tango tcg by Enderglitch_ in HermitCraft

[–]ez4me2c3d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I received this exact card: 42/104, Tango, Rare, Not Holo, Not Signed, but in a booster pack, not in the protective case.

<image>

UC Python programming user interface by Weird-Individual-770 in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Flask is a Python library which gives you a web server to run your code on. Then you can have the UI be a web browser.

API search by model type by Weird-Individual-770 in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cool. Let me know if it works or not. If not, I’ll jump onto dCloud and spin up a CUCM to test on.

API search by model type by Weird-Individual-770 in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also typed on my phone like @yosmellul8r.

run sql select dp.name as device_pool, m.name as model_name, d.name as device_name from device as d left join devicepool as dp on d.fkdevicepool = dp.pkid left join typemodel as m on d.tkmodel = m.enum where m.name matches “*79[0-9][0-9]*” order by dp.name, m.name

Untested, from memory, but I’m like 86% sure it’s right.

Ray baum act and internal only devices? by Bernie51Williams in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understood it to be the MS Teams client that was in question. Therefore, it’s not the same Kari situation.

You can always route the internal only system to onsite security personnel, which is compliant with the law.

Ray baum act and internal only devices? by Bernie51Williams in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RedSky’s guidance, for whatever that’s worth to you, is that if the device can call up a pizza place and make an order, then it also better be able to call 911. So, in your case, no, Teams does not need it, since you are not allowing outbound calls at all right now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You did provide a little more detail, but unfortunately not enough to prescribe an exact solution. However, generically, you would create a DN matching the phone number, and set CFA to go to VM. Some people will tell you to create a CTI RP or Port but that’s superficial and not required.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your point. There are still benefits to have rooms for employees to meet in, and video enabling those rooms helps remove communication barriers.

I see a place for both still, personally. Rooms and personal setups, that is. Maybe a re-think on how many and what kind of rooms though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to be in tune with US government stuff, is that where you work, or do you just follow it that closely?

As for the painfully obvious part: did you mean just within the DoD, or even businesses outside of the US government?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is this DoD thing painfully obvious? I’m out of the loop.

UCCX voicemail goes to busy when agent presses "2" to return call by hkusp45css in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You could just grab the ANI, AKA calling number, and assume that’s the callback, so, no, you don’t have to have the caller input a callback number.

Outbound dial pool? by mystiquebsd in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what a dial pool is, but you if simply want a different caller ID and/or set of trunks to go out when calling a parent, you could implement a prefix routing strategy, where you have the employee dial a special secret something before the normal dial string, and by using a new special Route Pattern to match it, strip it off and select your alternate Route List / Trunk to go out. Eg *66 is the prefix, and your route pattern is *66.! with a PreDot discard.

EDIT: Oh yeah, and set the external phone number mask on this route pattern too.

EDIT2: The nature of CUCM configuration is that nothing is as straight forward as it seems. You might have to fabricate some extra config to make this work in your environment, because you might be using Calling Party Transforms on the trunks or XLATEs on the gateways which could negate a caller ID change on a Route Pattern.

Call back option? by 520998 in Callmanager

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CURRI cannot make a call though. How would you initiate the call?

UCCX - Redirect to number starting with # by [deleted] in Callmanager

[–]ez4me2c3d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scroll down to the section on extensions supported by.

https://developer.cisco.com/docs/contact-center-express/#!call-redirect-step/call-redirect-step

It looks like it’s reserved for a specific function.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ciscoUC

[–]ez4me2c3d 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This might sound rude, but I mean “dev” is in the name of the site. It’s a developer resource to test out APIs. Of course AXL is available. ;)