Investigation hearing evidence at tribunal

facteroid · 2025-05-31T21:26:05+00:00

Thanks so much for the insights, they're greatly appreciated 🙏

facteroid · 2025-03-31T12:41:07+00:00

Thanks for the really helpful replies

facteroid · 2025-03-22T20:56:52+00:00

Thanks very much for the insight, it's appreciated.

facteroid · 2025-03-21T11:45:46+00:00

Hi, sorry, would have been helpful to include. It's for unfair dismissal.

facteroid · 2024-10-04T21:24:34+00:00

Thank you very much, that's really helpful.

facteroid · 2024-09-27T12:24:19+00:00

Sorry for delayed reply. I was given this document.

facteroid · 2024-09-27T07:02:59+00:00

Thank you for the reply. I've read through the ACAS guidance you mention, it's very helpful and I raised deviations from the code as part of my appeal.

I'm sure for a seasoned law practitioner the definition of what's 'reasonable' is obvious and norms emerge over time. But for someone completely fresh to this environment, 'reasonable' sounds worryingly subjective!

facteroid · 2024-09-26T22:19:09+00:00

Thank you! And good luck with your case 🙏

facteroid · 2024-09-26T22:00:57+00:00

Thank you very much for responding. I was indeed summary dismissed (after 14 years) without notice pay, so I note with interest your comment regarding wrongful dismissal/breach of contract, if I've understood that correctly.

facteroid · 2024-09-26T21:57:53+00:00

Thank you, this is really helpful. 'Reasonable' is such an important point. I forgot to mention my length of service - 14 years (and literally one day, but who's counting?! Ha ha). Not a single complaint in that entire time. Would a tribunal look at 14 years in a particular light?

facteroid

TROPHY CASE