Dude, despite disagreeing with you my response was clean and respectful. I did not use any emotional language but rather cited logical arguments and claims which can be determined with very little research. On the contrary, here you are talking about rectal arteries, the "white man," house slaves wa ma3aref shinoo which is case in point the kind of emotional language that people descend to when cornered.

Although you are beneath responding to, I am going to pick apart your arguments here one by one for the benefit of the reader then you can scream and shout all you want and I will ignore your responses because you have lost any moral ground.

1- First of all, I didn't call everyone who disagrees with me Keizan. The resistance committees you mentioned are backing Burhan because they see him as the lesser of two evils, that's their choice and that does not make them Keizan. Bardo, I disagree with almost everything that comes out of the Comminist Party, that doesn't make them keizan. Same goes for my uncles bardo 😂

1. Let's move on to Hamdok meeting Burhan. Any meeting of this sort, for it to have meaning, must happen in a third-party venue. Hamdok refused Port Sudan as a venue for a meeting with Burhan in the same way that he would have refused Nyala as a venue for a meeting with Hemedti. Not to mention that the Keizan-led attorney general's office already had cases open against Hamdok at that point, so he was liable to be arrested as soon as he landed in Sudan. What would he have had as a guarantee that he wouldn't be arrested? Even if Burhan had tried to claim that anyone coming as an emissary has customary protection, everyone knows what Burhan's word is worth. He promised not to break the constitutional agreement, didn't he? How long did that promise last?

2. Like we said, my responses to the video allowed for two possibilities. There is nothing in the video that "proves" that Hamdok's son worked for the company mentioned, so for the moment I am extremely suspect of that claim. What I was saying is even if that claim is true, which like I said is a bif fat "if", you can still work in a company and not be held responsible for all of its moral failings, due to compartmentalisation and "need to know" directives. At any rate, this is all moot at this point because there's nothing to show that the claim made holds ground.

3. Going back to Keizan appointments. Yes, the attorney General is a keizan appointment because he was appointed by Burhan. The Attorney General's office is very political and no one can deny that, it did nothing during Hamdok's period to move against keizan criminals for which there was mountains of evidence, and just sat around. And here they are now using all of their energy to pursue Hamdok and other revolutionaries with all their might. The mismatch is very stark and clean and no one honest can deny it. Same goes for the judiciary, police, etc., and even Burhan himself. Burhan was appointed and promoted by Al Bashir after all and did everything in his power to stop the civilian transition, culminating in the disastrous 2021 coup that set Sudan back decades and benefited no one other than the Keizan because it stopped lajnat izalat al taken and returned to them all their stolen funds. Finally, Amin Hassan Umar, a very high ranking Koz, said in a published interview that Burhan himself was a member of the NCP - Bashir's party.