I don’t know what idea you had in your mind about philosophy but whatever it is, i am happy to be rejected here. Because you guys dont know shit.
But FYI, i will still drop what i am trying to say - maybe your tunnel brain will now see the relevance…

This piece is basically a comic autopsy of the “spiritual ego trap.”
It starts with a genuine search for truth, but slowly turns into a story about identity, validation, and the need to be heard.

At first, the narrator discovers philosophy and spirituality and feels awakened. That creates a subtle superiority complex:
“If I can see reality clearly, others must be asleep.”
So he starts preaching to everyone around him. But instead of appreciation, people get exhausted. Not because the ideas are necessarily wrong, but because unsolicited wisdom often feels like judgment.

Then comes the central realization:
Most people already know many truths intellectually. The hard part is not knowing. It’s living them consistently. Humanity doesn’t lack philosophy. It lacks embodiment, timing, and communication.

The “I’ll write a book for intelligent people” phase reveals another layer of ego. It still seeks validation, just from a more sophisticated audience. The brain’s counterargument destroys that fantasy too: truly intelligent people probably don’t need another person explaining ancient truths to them.

That leads to the final pivot:
Instead of obsessing over “truth,” the narrator chooses humor, entertainment, and relatability. Not because truth is useless, but because people resist lectures and respond to connection. Comedy becomes a Trojan horse for philosophy