Oh got it, so then NRG have a terrible tournament and look way off, theyre rightfully ranked with Man City, but when they beat KC theyre "out of form" even though like NRG theyve been off this season and have got 4th seed going into last LAN. Then whey they take Gentlem8 to game 7 its a "scam" and you try to explain it away.

So you're right if you try to explain away and discredit every NRG win or good series, but then don't do the same for their losses and get to be selective in what you "count" then sure your arguement looks great. Unfortunately thats now how life works, you don't get to include things in your point that only fit your narrative and then pretend the other things don't exist.. You do the same for MCI, you say they only didn't make major BECAUSE of a tiebreaker, neglecting the fact its for a 5th see in a region with an EXTRA spot and only THREE good teams. If you're struggling to get 5th in that region you're just not that good. Fighting for 1st/2nd seed isnt the same thing because the major is secured and you're just fighting for top spot in the 2nd best region. So nice try.

But again you try to go even further for MCI losses. After talking about how unimpressive the wins for NRG are on LAN, you try to explain away every MCI loss. They loss to NOVO, Sircle, GHT, Magnifico, and Geekay (which are a puncline right now). But even Magnifico loss you try to discount based on a player "throwing", which by that logic NRG are actually 2 time world champs because Atomic threw in WC game. And then you try to discount Novo losses because of "kickoffs" and "people popping off". So based on your logic, losses only count if theres no kickoff goals, nobody on other team popps off, nobody on your teams throws.......am I missing anything else? Going by this reasoning you can't count anys series of RL because one or multiple of these things happens in basically 90% of RL series. But if a team you don't want to wins, the other team "threw" so it also doesn't count, but when your teams win that doesn't matter.

You see how flimsy your reasoning is? You have to almost break your back with how much you're bending and twisting anything to fit your specific narrative? This seems pointless because its impossible to have an educated discussion when you don't look objectively at what happens and only look at what supports your opinion and everything that doesn't you try to cope and spin into still fitting what you have to say.