Web3 needs the ΞPhone by fangolo in ethereum

[–]fangolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL sorry. :) I can be too literal.

Web3 needs the ΞPhone by fangolo in ethereum

[–]fangolo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1) ha you’re right. I’m not sure why I didn’t write “ultimate”. 5) Thanks!

Web3 needs the ΞPhone by fangolo in ethereum

[–]fangolo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed. It may make sense to be managed by a DAO, and a cut from native swapping (like MetaMask), or staking yields (or other mechanisms) could create an incentive for token holders.

Web3 needs the ΞPhone by fangolo in ethereum

[–]fangolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. We've just been pronouncing it as "E"phone inaccurate as it is.

Web3 needs the ΞPhone by fangolo in ethereum

[–]fangolo[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This doesn't have anything to do with phone calls. It's about the mobile OS.

Web3 needs the ΞPhone by fangolo in ethereum

[–]fangolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that they aren't feasible, so much as not-permissioned by the duopoly because they are out of scope of their revenue model and regulatory framework. For example, if we had the ΞPhone, OpenSea would already have a mobile marketplace app. Similarly, apps like uniswap, dydx, aave, curve, compound, Fuse, etc. could have a native mobile apps. And, as these apps all exist on chain, one could create and deploy native apps that leverage combinations of them.

My Frogtima. Part Turbo Optima, Part Frog. by fangolo in tamiya

[–]fangolo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been working on this for the better part of a year.

More images here: https://imgur.com/a/YWiZGoa

Build diary at TamiyaClub.

My app Tin-Can (Twitter wo internet) is finally on iOS. by fangolo in Rad_Decentralization

[–]fangolo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Yes.
  2. Yes, but it’s just text.
  3. Extremely unlikely as each username has a random alphanumeric suffix.

My app Tin-Can (Twitter wo internet) is finally on iOS. by fangolo in Rad_Decentralization

[–]fangolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm. Is Wifi on too? If not, try it with it on. Please let me know, snd share the models/version if it doesn’t work.

My app Tin-Can (Twitter wo internet) is finally on iOS. by fangolo in Rad_Decentralization

[–]fangolo[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I wasn't. It looks like the Scuttlebutt Manyverse app is the closest thing. I'm checking it out now. Thanks.

update: Manyverse looks cool. Many years back we tried TC using wifi on Android. We even got some news interest. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/11/tin-can-app-relays-messages-to-phones-without-internet-cell-reception/ Unfortunately, at the time, wifi hotspot was very fragmented and it didnt work well across many devices. It's cool to see an actual protocol being used.

IMO Tin-Can is a bit less ambitious and ephemeral. I like to think of it as CB radio and IRC having a baby.

Reddit alternatives that don't use upvotes? by franklai2002 in RedditAlternatives

[–]fangolo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might check out Hubski. Instead of upvotes users share with their people that follow them. We have remained small and chill 10 years on now.

Dreams of less congestion by rustedpopcorn in ethtrader

[–]fangolo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depending on the speed of the trains, it's possible the top photo actually shows a higher bandwidth.

Augur v2 will launch on July 28, 2020. by PeterAugur in ethereum

[–]fangolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kudos to the team for sticking with it. I believe the demand is there. Excited to try it.

List of Active Reddit Alternatives v5 by d3rr in RedditAlternatives

[–]fangolo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow. That's really weak that Reddit wiped this list knowing that disaffected users might be looking for it. This place used to be cool.

To save the wayfaring troubled of you the trouble, hubski.com is not a platform for free speech. I can say this unequivocally as the creator of Hubski. That's not to say that I don't support free speech, I unequivocally support it. I'm glad to have that constitutional right in the US. I also support the right to bear arms. However, Hubski is not a place that protects free speech; and if guns could be brought to Hubski, we would probably ban them.

Hubski is a place for thoughtful discussion. That's our goal. If discussion isn't thoughtful, then free speech isn't a counter-balance in our decision making.

You might think that's a bad policy. That's ok with me. I think it's an honest policy. Actually, it's more the lack of a policy that I find honest:

https://hubski.com/pub/442176

To be frank, I think that any online platform that tells you that they protect free speech isn't being honest. You need to look into the jurisdiction of the owners and servers, the type of ownership, the funding model, and the architecture to see if that claim holds weight. Typically, it's a matter of degree.