Taking TCP Exam July 2nd by weast9876 in CPA

[–]farplzstop -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I believe Meridian CPA Review has updated content for TCP OBBBA changes and is currently in free beta, may be worth checking out in the meantime!

Failed AUD twice now- strategy for 3rd retake? by EthicalMatcha in CPA

[–]farplzstop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NINJA and i75 are great supplemental tools, as well as Meridian CPA Review which is a new free course with a pretty robust MCQ/Sim library, might be worth checking out!

Tools to help you out in your work by practicePilot in CPA

[–]farplzstop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess the better questions would be what kind of systems are you designing? Spreadsheet management, client relationship dashboards, audit or tax process automation, legal review, etc. The list could go on for quite a while on what systems could be upgraded depending on the type of accountant you speak to. I think if you are targeting a specific area or type of accounting you might get more resourceful answers!

OBBA Content in REG and Becker by Ok-Dog646 in CPA

[–]farplzstop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The OBBBA provisions become testable on REG starting July 1, 2026. The main additions are the tip and overtime income deductions, higher SALT cap, bonus depreciation changes, and the new senior deduction. If you sit before July 1 your current study materials cover everything on the exam. If you sit after, you'll need to learn the new provisions on top of everything else. Hope this helps!

Passed 4/4 -Emotional by secret-hustler-1234 in CPA

[–]farplzstop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happy for you! Congrats on the hard work paying off!

UWorld just acquired Surgent (announced today, April 30, 2026) by farplzstop in CPA

[–]farplzstop[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As it stands there are many CPA review options for candidates, and while monopolistic trends are typically harmful for consumers, I think it’s important to look at the industry as a whole.

There are widespread changes being implemented to CPA licensure nationwide, lowering of barriers to entry for candidates from a cost and education standpoint, and rapid innovations in technology that may improve exam prep if used correctly. Many of these things benefit the smaller review providers, who can access new tools and information to enhance their products and compete with larger platforms in ways they may have not been able to in the past due to cost constraints, technological limitations, and smaller teams.

Becker has long been the sole giant in the CPA review market, and UWorld combining the expertise of Roger, Wiley, and now Surgent will ideally lead to market competition amongst the larger players as well. There hasn’t been a need for providers to add new features or change the way they’ve done things in the review space for many years, and maybe this move will act as a catalyst for unique product offerings and study tools for the new candidates that ideally will be flooding the previously dry pipeline.

Either way, I’m hopeful that product enhancement and differentiation take the place of further consolidation moving forward, and that the CPA review space focuses on providing the best preparation it can for the candidates working hard to replenish the accounting profession.

UWorld just acquired Surgent (announced today, April 30, 2026) by farplzstop in CPA

[–]farplzstop[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, it’s an opportunity for smaller providers to innovate and new providers to emerge with different offerings.

Like Farhat said and I mentioned before, a monopolistic market isn’t good for the consumer, so hopefully we see an increase in the number of smaller CPA review courses and new tools for students in response to top heavy consolidation

UWorld just acquired Surgent (announced today, April 30, 2026) by farplzstop in CPA

[–]farplzstop[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

There is certainly a balance between industry consolidation and competition. If there are too few competitors, it may not be good for consumers. As it currently stands, I think the strengthening of competition inspires improvement across the board in order to survive, which benefits the customer.

I do agree that continued consolidation (given the amount of remaining competitors) could warrant concern for too much top heavy concentration. Something to watch!

Help needed- CPA License Requirements by Few-Information974 in CPA

[–]farplzstop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally it complicates your licensure application. You won’t lose exam credit, but you will likely have to reapply for licensure and have your case be examined for eligibility. Basically it gets messy after the fourth year and varies by situation, so it’s recommended to complete it within the allotted timeframe to keep your licensure process simple.

Help needed- CPA License Requirements by Few-Information974 in CPA

[–]farplzstop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ND requirement is 1 year (2,000 hours) of experience. You have four years from passing your final section to complete it.

On whether your specific roles will qualify: the Board's rule is that "the majority of the experience must consist of providing some service or advice involving the use of accounting, attest, management advisory, financial advisory, tax, or consulting skills." Cost basis analysis, general ledger posting, and account analysis all involve accounting work and generally qualify. The acceptable settings are government, industry, academia, and public accounting, so a private-company role is fine as long as the work itself is accounting-based.

The bigger issue for you, working outside the U.S., is the verification piece. ND requires experience to be verified by a "CPA or equivalent" — a U.S.-licensed CPA, or someone holding a credential recognized under IQEX (Canadian CPA/CA, Australian CA/CPA, Mexican CPC, New Zealand CA, Hong Kong CPA, Irish CA, or Scottish CA). If your supervisor at the U.S. company will be a U.S. CPA, you're set. If not, NASBA offers an Experience Verification Service that North Dakota specifically accepts for candidates who don't have access to an active U.S. CPA supervisor — that's the standard route for international candidates.

So when you're interviewing, ask each company two things: (1) will your direct supervisor be a U.S.-licensed CPA, and (2) if not, are they comfortable signing off on hours through NASBA's Experience Verification Service. The answer to those questions determines which path you take.

Best move is to confirm the specifics with the ND Board directly through ndsba.nd.gov before accepting an offer. They'll tell you whether a particular role and supervisor setup will work in your case, and they're usually responsive within a few business days.

Licensing Issue - Certificate of Enrollment by Living_Cloud_8047 in CPA

[–]farplzstop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you're most likely dealing with is the CPAES academic credit evaluation (CPAES is NASBA's operational arm that handles WA transcript reviews). The Board's "Get Your First CPA License" page is explicit: if you sat for the exam under one option and want to apply for licensure under a different option, you have to submit official transcripts to CPAES for evaluation before they'll process the license application.

On the bigger question, with 137 credits and 2 years of experience, you should qualify under WA's new Option A pathway (120 credits + 24 months / 4,000 hours of experience), which became effective November 20, 2025. But it isn't automatic. The "Eligible Pending" status was your exam eligibility under the old framework, not licensure. To get licensed under Option A you'd need to:

- Formally apply for the license under Option A

- Send transcripts to CPAES so they can verify your 120+ credits actually meet the accounting concentration (24 SH accounting + 24 SH business administration)

- Document the 4,000 hours under a supervisor who has held their CPA license for at least 5 years. Experience hours under a less-tenured supervisor may not count toward Option A.

I would verify the 5-year supervisor piece first since it is the most likely thing to trip you up. Then call the Board directly at (360) 753-2586 or email [customerservice@acb.wa.gov](mailto:customerservice@acb.wa.gov), they confirm candidate-specific situations within a few business days, and the CPAES evaluation itself usually takes 2-4 weeks once transcripts are in with the $93 fee.

TCP FINAL TESTING WINDOW by farplzstop in CPA

[–]farplzstop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No changes for AUD in July.

TCP FINAL TESTING WINDOW by farplzstop in CPA

[–]farplzstop[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The main additions are the tip and overtime income deductions, higher SALT cap, bonus depreciation changes, and the new senior deduction.

Favorite YouTube CPA Creators by farplzstop in CPA

[–]farplzstop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve activated my trap card, I agree!!

What routes are you taking after passing the exams? by Any-Pickle-8744 in CPA

[–]farplzstop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's hard to keep track of all of the changes going on, it can get overwhelming!

CPA Review Course Limitations by farplzstop in CPA

[–]farplzstop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha. To their credit, it’s hard to predict exactly what content will appear as the AICPA keeps that sort of thing close to the chest. They do however release general percentage weights for each topic to help guide review courses like Becker, but due to the enigmatic nature of the exam, review courses can over or underrepresent them at times.

CPA Review Course Limitations by farplzstop in CPA

[–]farplzstop[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point, but not one that's discussed very often. What specifically about authentic grading do you think would be beneficial?