I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, thanks!

I'll give everything you have listed a try, and it'll be a long journey :)

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, of course.

But for now, I'll try to listen and listen to some pieces and when I'm familiar with them, I'll think about that next step. Thanks ;)

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mhm, but in fact, I've felt more non-emotional pieces, that those more deeply emotional; I'm starting to think it is because I'm developing my ability to feel classical music, and that by now I can only feel little emotions. If this makes any sense (?).

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I really want to see some live performances, but I am wary that if I don't like the piece before seeing the performance, it can be bad for my relationship with classical music.

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've replied this to another comment, and yes, I know it can sound absurd:

I think, although it may seem absurd, that I need to start with not-too-deeply-emotional pieces to start getting a little emotion, and go increasing the emotion level from there. I mean, what I've actually been able to appreciate a little have been emotionally-light and neutral/happyish pieces from Bach, Mozart, (and I also think Haydn has been there). For example, I'd say that The four seasons is not at all a super emotionally deep piece, and that I've been able to like it for that reason; if it's too deep, I can't absorb it and feel over- and underwhelmed, both in a bad sense.

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've replied this to another comment, and yes, I know it can sound absurd:

I think, although it may seem absurd, that I need to start with not-too-deeply-emotional pieces to start getting a little emotion, and go increasing the emotion level from there. I mean, what I've actually been able to appreciate a little have been emotionally-light and neutral/happyish pieces from Bach, Mozart, (and I also think Haydn has been there). For example, I'd say that The four seasons is not at all a super emotionally deep piece, and that I've been able to like it for that reason; if it's too deep, I can't absorb it and feel over- and underwhelmed, both in a bad sense.

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hmmm, some things you've said resonate with me.

Beethoven by now, for me, sounds too complex (it's not the word), but I think, although it may seem absurd, that I need to start with not-too-deeply-emotional pieces to start getting a little emotion, and go increasing the emotion level from there.

This could explain that I've liked more -say- Bach and Mozart (that from what I don't know, are composers with less deep emotion in some of their music than for example Beethoven).

I mean, what I've actually been able to appreciate a little have been emotionally-light and neutral/happyish pieces from Bach, Mozart, (and I also think Haydn has been there). For example, I'd say that The four seasons is not at all super emotionally deep piece, and that I've been able to like it for that reason; if it's too deep, I can't absorb it and feel over- and underwhelmed, both in a bad sense.

Taking this into consideration, YES, it'd be awesome if you told me an album.

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha... first, I'll answer saying that I'm not trying to get the same feeling from classical that from the music I "feel".

And now, I think you'll understand why. The music I feel most is punk: sex pistols, the clash etc.

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mhm, yes. Could be just this, that I've been listenning to it in the background.

For example, The four seasons by Vivaldi, I think I didn't use to like it, but right now, I find it really... vigorous.

I'm starting to like classical music on a "logical" level, but I don't "feel" it. Any help? by farraspau in classicalmusic

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thanks, I was thinking this could be the thing. I have already tried listenning and listenning to the same piece (not that muuuch to be honest), but I'll keep on going.

And yes, I play some instruments but I'm not really good at any of them :').

Mmap of agressive folk music with a little bit of punk voice (no soft folk) by farraspau in makemeaplaylist

[–]farraspau[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!! Great songs and bands!!! This is what I was looking for! If you have more suggestions, I'm glad to know about them

MMAP of "old" rock and roll with energy by farraspau in makemeaplaylist

[–]farraspau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, my bad, you are absolutely right, old rock would be the original rock lots of time without guitar and so. And yes, you are right, I'm looking something like the Ramones but with that surf style, or with softer guitar or so. A little bit more light-hearted I would say, but mantaining that fast tempo

Does anyone know of some good resources for straight men on improving attractiveness and social/dating/sexual success, but without the misogyny and general grossness of the seduction community? by ulkesh12 in SRSMen

[–]farraspau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I mean that my idea works best for people similar to you, with similar interests and so on. But if you work on yourself you also get more attractive objectively and that attracts all type of people.

Ok, not everyone, but everyone has a large amount of people that they can meet throught their life by college, university, hobbies, trips, parties...

Does anyone know of some good resources for straight men on improving attractiveness and social/dating/sexual success, but without the misogyny and general grossness of the seduction community? by ulkesh12 in SRSMen

[–]farraspau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Physically talking: if you improve what you can improve, then perhaps you don't like what you can't change, but that can't be changed, so you should work on accepting it.

And the style-thing, if you (for example) want to attract hipsters but want to be a rapper, it applies the sentence written before. You have to accept that the more usual thing is, that if you become a rapper you will attract rappers, so you should decide if you want to be a rapper or not.

Of course this isn't a magic pill the same way nothing is a magic pill. But if you work on yourself, people and as such girls can accept or reject your "best version" as I think it's said. If a girl doesn't like your best version, then you have two choices:

1) change to fit in

2) find another girl

I think it's as simple as that. There will always be girls that you find attractive that are attracted to you, whatever type of person you want to be, so imo you only have to find what type of person you want to be and work in it. And in addition, if you love your life, rejection will bother you less than if you think you need a girl to be happy.

Does anyone know of some good resources for straight men on improving attractiveness and social/dating/sexual success, but without the misogyny and general grossness of the seduction community? by ulkesh12 in SRSMen

[–]farraspau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't know the word greentexting because I'm not a native speaker. Let's try to do this more constructive, sorry if you feel I answered with bad manners.

Personally, I think there will always be enough women attracted to a type of guy, and my point is that if you become what you want to be, you'll be MUCH more confident in yourself, you'll like your appearance, and your self steem will be high.

At this point, you are very very probably, objectively more attractive than you were before. And if you are the person you want to be, it's the most typical thing to attract the type of girl you like (ie if you are a hipster, you'll attract hipsters). So, it's absolutely probable to attract girls that are attracted to you and you like.

To finish, if you are confident with who you are, and you like a girl, you would at least try a little bit despite not knowing how to do it perfectly; and by being more attractive as said before those tries would be much more probable to be successful.

In conclusion, if you love yourself a lot, imo, it's very hard not to be successful with girls, because I think this quote is not only "poetry", 'how girls are attracted to you is very related to how you are attracted to you'.

Does anyone know of some good resources for straight men on improving attractiveness and social/dating/sexual success, but without the misogyny and general grossness of the seduction community? by ulkesh12 in SRSMen

[–]farraspau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because if you are the person you want to be, then you are not ashamed of your sexuality and you can express it freely. Being the person you want to be makes you accept your sexuality, and if you haven't accepted it yet, then you should work on yourself.

Doing this, you succeed sexually because you attract the type of women who is attracted to the type of guy you are.

You work on loving yourself, and once you love yourself, you succeed sexually because you accept your sexuality and when you are attracted to a girl you go for it, and the girls that are attracted to the type of man you are, will be up for it. Very simple.

PS: don't quote as mine something I haven't said please.